High Roller Technologies, a NYSE-listed global online gaming operator, signed an agreement with Crypto.com to introduce regulated prediction market products in the United States. The deal marks High Roller’s entry into the fast-growing event contract sector and opens new revenue opportunities across finance, sports, and entertainment.Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don't!).According to third-party estimates, a mature U.S. prediction market could surpass $1 trillion in annual trading volume. The partnership gives High Roller access to the segment through Crypto.com’s regulated derivatives infrastructure.Partnership Expands Regulated Event Trading AccessUnder the agreement, High Roller will offer event contracts provided by Crypto.com, Derivatives North America, which operates as a CFTC-registered exchange and clearinghouse. High Roller plans to register as a CFTC Introducing Broker and work with Crypto.com’s Futures Commission Merchant to distribute these contracts across its consumer platforms.Kris Marszalek, Co-founder and CEO of Crypto.com, said the collaboration aims to “expand access to regulated event contracts in the United States through a differentiated and highly scalable offering.”High Roller CEO Seth Young added that the partnership represents “a significant milestone” in preparing the company’s product and technical foundations for its move into the prediction space. “We believe this agreement gives us a strong position in a market with meaningful long-term potential,” he said.The companies plan to offer event-based trading opportunities covering finance, entertainment, and sports. High Roller expects the partnership to create new income streams and intends to announce updates on product development, branding, and launch timing in the coming months.You may also like: Crypto.com Joins Ripple, Circle and Others in Securing Conditional US Federal Bank CharterCrypto.com already operates prediction markets and recently launched OG, a standalone prediction market platform that offers regulated event contracts to U.S. clients through its existing derivatives infrastructure. The agreement with High Roller Technologies extends the reach of this business by adding a new distribution channel, rather than marking Crypto.com’s first move into prediction markets.Exchanges Race Into Prediction MarketsMajor crypto brands have also used partnerships to speed up their entry into prediction markets in 2026. Binance rolled out in‑app prediction markets through an integration with Predict.fun, embedding a BNB Smart Chain–based protocol directly into the Binance wallet while subsidizing trading and settlement fees to encourage early use. Last month, Gate.io became the first centralized exchange to integrate Polymarket, launching a public beta that lets users access on‑chain prediction markets from within the Gate app, including standard exchange features such as order books and candlestick charts.These deals show a pattern: major exchanges plug into specialized prediction protocols or platforms to offer event contracts quickly and at scale, while focusing their own efforts on distribution, compliance, and user acquisition. This article was written by Jared Kirui at www.financemagnates.com.

The Joint Bank Reporting Committee (JBRC), jointly set up by the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB), today launched a public call for expressions of interest to join its Reporting Contact Group (RCG). The RCG brings together stakeholders with expertise in banks’ regulatory reporting and serves as a regular forum for cooperation, exchange of views and sharing of best practices with authorities. The call is open to candidates representing stakeholders across the European Economic Area (EEA). The deadline for applications is 28 April 2026 (23:59 CEST). Application process Applications must be submitted via the online application form (password: RCGApril2026) and include a CV (preferably in Europass format). Selection process and next steps Further details on the selection process are provided in the Call for candidates document. The JBRC will decide on the final composition of the RCG, aiming, to the extent possible, to ensure, diversity of the banking sector, geographical and gender balance and broad representation of stakeholders across the EEA. Applicants will be informed of the outcome of their application. The final composition of the RCG will be published on the EBA and ECB websites. A reserve list will also be established. For further information, please contact the RCG Secretariat at ecb-jbrc@ecb.europa.eu and eba-jbrc@eba.europa.eu Background information The JBRC was established by the EBA and the ECB under a Memorandum of Understanding signed on 18 March 2024, following a feasibility study conducted by the EBA in accordance with Article 430c(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. The JBRC promotes cooperation among European institutions and authorities involved in supervisory, resolution and statistical banking reporting and facilitates transparent engagement with stakeholders to support the development of an integrated reporting system. The RCG is a permanent substructure of the JBRC, composed of up to 22 members appointed for a three-year renewable mandate. Members are expected to dedicate at least one full day per week to RCG activities and to have strong expertise in supervisory, resolution and/or statistical reporting, or in related areas such as data modelling and standardisation. The mandate of the current RCG composition expires at the end of 2027. Documents Call for interest (292.23 KB - PDF) Related content Invitation Meeting28/04/2026 - 23:59 Protected entity Page Joint Bank Reporting Committee (JBRC)

Webull Canada has introduced zero-commission trading for U.S. and Canadian equities, removing one of the remaining cost barriers for retail investors in the country. The change applies across account types, including tax-advantaged structures such as TFSAs and RRSPs, as well as margin and cash accounts. The move places Webull more directly in competition with established low-cost brokers in Canada, where pricing, platform features, and access to global markets continue to shape how firms compete for retail flow. It also reflects a broader shift in brokerage economics, where commissions are no longer the primary revenue driver. Commission Free Model Extends Across Accounts The zero-commission structure allows Canadian investors to trade listed equities without paying brokerage fees on each transaction. This applies to both domestic and U.S. stocks, which remain a core component of retail portfolios in Canada due to the size and liquidity of U.S. markets. The offering covers multiple account types, including registered accounts such as TFSAs and RRSPs, which are widely used for long-term investing, as well as margin accounts for more active strategies. By applying the same pricing model across these structures, Webull simplifies how users interact with different parts of their portfolio. Michael Constantino, CEO of Webull Canada, said removing commissions allows investors to allocate more capital directly into their positions rather than absorbing trading costs. He said the change is intended to reduce friction and improve access to capital markets for Canadian users. While commissions are removed, other charges such as regulatory and exchange fees still apply. This reflects standard industry practice, where brokers pass through third-party costs even when execution fees are eliminated. Canadian Brokerage Market Continues To Shift The introduction of zero-commission trading comes as the Canadian brokerage market continues to evolve. Traditional brokers have reduced fees over time, while newer platforms compete on pricing, user experience, and access to global assets. Unlike earlier phases of the market, where commissions were a primary source of revenue, many brokers now rely on alternative income streams. These can include payment for order flow, interest on client balances, securities lending, and premium features. For investors, the result is a shift in how costs are perceived. Instead of paying per trade, users interact with platforms where pricing is embedded in spreads, financing rates, or additional services. This changes the decision-making process, particularly for active traders who previously factored commission costs into strategy design. Webull’s entry into this segment suggests continued pressure on pricing across the industry. As more platforms adopt similar models, differentiation moves toward platform capabilities, asset coverage, and execution quality rather than headline fees. Platform Features Target Active And Self Directed Investors Webull positions its platform around a combination of low-cost access and advanced trading tools. The system includes charting functionality, real-time market data, and support for multi-leg options strategies, which are typically used by more experienced traders. At the same time, the platform includes features aimed at newer investors, such as paper trading. This allows users to test strategies in a simulated environment before committing capital, lowering the barrier to entry for those unfamiliar with market dynamics. The inclusion of both advanced tools and entry-level features reflects the dual audience many digital brokers target. Active traders require execution tools and data, while newer users prioritize accessibility and learning resources. Balancing these needs has become a standard requirement for platforms operating at scale. Webull’s global infrastructure supports trading across multiple asset classes, including equities, options, and other instruments available through its network of regulated entities. In Canada, the focus remains on equities and listed derivatives, aligned with local regulatory frameworks. Zero Commission Trading And Revenue Models The shift toward zero-commission trading raises questions about how brokers generate revenue. While removing execution fees attracts users, platforms must replace that income through other channels to maintain operations and invest in technology. In many markets, payment for order flow plays a role, where brokers receive compensation for routing trades to specific market makers. However, regulatory frameworks differ by jurisdiction, and the extent to which this model applies in Canada is more limited compared to the United States. Other revenue sources include interest earned on uninvested cash balances, margin lending, and subscription-based features. These models allow brokers to maintain a zero-commission structure while generating income tied to account activity rather than individual trades. For users, this means that while explicit trading costs may decline, overall cost structures become less visible. Understanding how platforms generate revenue becomes part of evaluating where and how to trade. What This Means For Retail Investors In Canada The introduction of commission-free trading provides Canadian investors with another option in a market that has gradually moved toward lower-cost access. For long-term investors, the removal of commissions can improve net returns over time, particularly for strategies involving regular contributions or rebalancing. For active traders, the impact depends on execution quality and platform reliability. Lower costs can support higher trading frequency, but only if spreads, latency, and order routing meet expectations. As a result, pricing alone is unlikely to determine platform choice. The broader effect may be increased competition among brokers, leading to further changes in pricing and service models. As platforms continue to expand features and reduce visible costs, the focus may shift toward how effectively they integrate trading, data, and portfolio management into a single environment. Webull’s move adds to this trend, reinforcing the direction of travel in retail brokerage toward lower entry costs and more integrated digital platforms. The long-term outcome will depend on how firms balance pricing, revenue generation, and client experience in an increasingly competitive market.

Louisa Plaice spent five years with spread betting and CFD provider Intertrader, serving as Head of Marketing - EMEA. The post Cboe hires Intertrader / Equifax alum Louisa Plaice for Europe institutional marketing appeared first on FX News Group.

Hyperliquid has become one of the most extraordinary revenue engines in crypto. Public analytics suggest that the protocol generated roughly $961.5 million in gross protocol revenue in 2025 and about $873.7 million in gross profit, while current annualized revenue still sits near $675 million. At the same time, the network is processing roughly $193.9 billion in 30-day perpetual volume, carrying around $8.2 billion in open interest, and supporting a token market cap of about $10.6 billion. But behind the growth story sits a harder compliance question: Hyperliquid’s official materials emphasize self-custody, restricted jurisdictions, and sanctions rules, yet FinTelegram could not identify any publicly disclosed exchange, broker-dealer, or derivatives license attached to the front-end or protocol stack reviewed. Key Findings Hyperliquid is operating at exchange-scale economics. DeFiLlama currently shows about $674.6 million annualized revenue, $758.8 million annualized fees, $193.9 billion in 30-day perp volume, and $8.21 billion in open interest, placing Hyperliquid in the top tier of crypto trading venues by economic output. Its 2025 financial performance was exceptional. Based on DeFiLlama’s quarterly income statement, Hyperliquid generated about $961.49 million gross protocol revenue in 2025 and approximately $873.68 million gross profit after cost of revenue. The business model is brutally efficient. Hyperliquid has been widely described in recent coverage as an 11-person organization that produced over $900 million in profit in 2025, making it one of the most profitable crypto startups per employee. Value capture is unusually direct. Hyperliquid’s docs state that fees are directed to the community, deployers, HLP, and especially the Assistance Fund, which automatically converts fees into HYPE and burns the tokens. Commercial traction is now spilling into tradfi-adjacent products. S&P Dow Jones Indices licensed the S&P 500 to Trade[XYZ] for perpetuals on Hyperliquid in March 2026, a milestone showing how seriously the market now takes Hyperliquid’s liquidity layer. The regulatory posture remains the weak flank. Hyperliquid’s official interface terms restrict U.S. and other “Restricted Persons,” but the reviewed official materials do not identify a publicly disclosed broker, exchange, or derivatives license for the trading interface or protocol venue. That gap matters more, not less, as Hyperliquid gets bigger. Hyperliquid has now funded a Washington policy center focused on building legal pathways for DeFi perps in the U.S., a strong signal that the project itself sees regulation as a strategic frontier rather than a solved issue. Why This Matters Hyperliquid is no longer just another crypto protocol with a cult following. It now looks like a serious market infrastructure business masquerading in DeFi clothing: high throughput, deep liquidity, real fee generation, a native L1, an attached EVM environment, and a token that increasingly trades like an equity proxy on future growth. That combination is why many market participants now speak of Hyperliquid not merely as a successful protocol, but as one of the most economically powerful startups to emerge from crypto. For FinTelegram, however, the story is not just the success narrative. The real issue is whether Hyperliquid is becoming too large, too systemically relevant, and too economically sophisticated to continue relying on the familiar DeFi playbook of self-custody plus geofencing plus legal ambiguity. The Financial Performance: A DeFi Venue Printing Exchange-Scale Cash Flow The hard numbers are remarkable. DeFiLlama currently shows Hyperliquid with about $4.99 billion in TVL, $62.2 million revenue over the last 30 days, $55.29 million 30-day protocol revenue, $193.895 billion in 30-day perpetual volume, $7.412 billion in 24-hour perp volume, and $8.21 billion in open interest. On the token side, it shows a $10.626 billion market cap and roughly $42.9 billion fully diluted valuation for HYPE. The 2025 income statement is even more striking. Using DeFiLlama’s quarterly protocol data, Hyperliquid posted $139.67 million gross protocol revenue in Q1 2025, $180.35 million in Q2, $354.94 million in Q3, and $286.53 million in Q4. That adds up to $961.49 million for full-year 2025. Cost of revenue for those four quarters totaled $87.81 million, implying approximately $873.68 million in gross profit. Those figures line up with the broader market narrative that Hyperliquid generated roughly $900 million in 2025 profit with an extremely small core team. Recent long-form coverage and institutional commentary have framed Hyperliquid as a rare case of a crypto startup reaching elite-scale profitability without venture capital and with minimal organizational overhead. This is the core of the Hyperliquid phenomenon: a protocol-native trading venue generating the economics of a major exchange without the cost structure of a traditional financial institution. That is why Hyperliquid is not just outperforming peers; it is forcing the market to rethink what a high-value crypto business looks like. Why Hyperliquid Has Exceeded Expectations Hyperliquid’s commercial success is not accidental. Its official documentation describes a purpose-built layer-1 blockchain optimized from first principles, with fully onchain perpetual and spot order books, one-block finality, and throughput currently supporting around 200,000 orders per second. It also combines that trading engine with the HyperEVM, letting builders tap into the same liquidity base from an EVM-compatible environment. That architecture matters because Hyperliquid has been selling a very specific proposition to the market: CEX-like speed and UX without the conventional exchange stack. The docs explicitly emphasize onchain order books, low fees, transparent execution, and wallet-based onboarding rather than account-heavy intermediated access. The revenue design is equally important. Hyperliquid’s fee documentation says that on most other protocols the team or insiders are the main beneficiaries of fees, whereas on Hyperliquid fees are directed to the community, HLP, deployers, and the Assistance Fund; that fund then converts trading fees into HYPE and burns the tokens. In other words, the protocol couples venue growth to token scarcity in a way that makes the HYPE token a direct beneficiary of trading activity. Hyperliquid has also started to push beyond native crypto markets. In March 2026, S&P Dow Jones Indices licensed the S&P 500 to Trade[XYZ] for perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid, giving the chain a tradfi-branded benchmark product. That does not make Hyperliquid regulated finance, but it does show that serious external counterparties now view its market infrastructure as commercially relevant. The Regulatory Status: Big Platform, Thin License Story Here the picture changes sharply. Hyperliquid’s official terms make clear that the interface is not available to “Restricted Persons,” and the snippet surfaced by search explicitly shows that the platform geofences users in prohibited jurisdictions. Independent summaries of the same official terms consistently identify the United States and Ontario among those restricted jurisdictions. The official onboarding flow also reinforces Hyperliquid’s self-custodial design. Users connect wallets, confirm transactions in their EVM wallet, and are then ready to trade; the official docs focus on wallet connectivity, transfers, staking, API wallets, and developer endpoints rather than centralized customer onboarding or licensed intermediary status. That distinction is commercially powerful, but it does not answer the regulatory question. After reviewing Hyperliquid’s official website, docs, foundation site, and interface terms, FinTelegram could not identify any publicly disclosed broker-dealer, exchange, multilateral trading facility, crypto-asset service provider, futures commission merchant, or comparable derivatives license associated with the trading venue or front-end access reviewed. The official materials reviewed present Hyperliquid as a blockchain ecosystem with a self-custodial interface and a Cayman-based foundation, not as a conventionally licensed trading intermediary. That does not prove that no regulated entity touches any part of the broader ecosystem. It does mean that the public-facing regulatory story remains materially thinner than the commercial story. For a venue already operating at multibillion-dollar scale in open interest, that is not a small detail. It is the central legal vulnerability. The Cayman Foundation Is Not the Same as a Trading License An SEC filing tied to a proposed HYPE investment product states that the Hyper Foundation is a Cayman Islands registered foundation company formed in October 2024 to oversee growth and governance of the Hyperliquid Network. That is useful corporate context, but it is not the same thing as identifying a market-structure license for a trading venue dealing in leveraged products. This point is often blurred in crypto. A foundation structure can support governance, grants, ecosystem development, and token administration. It does not by itself answer whether the core trading functionality would satisfy exchange, brokerage, derivatives, conduct-of-business, AML, or investor-protection rules in key jurisdictions if regulators decide to look through the protocol narrative and focus on function. Hyperliquid Clearly Knows Regulation Is the Next Battlefield One of the strongest signals that Hyperliquid’s legal position is not settled came in February 2026, when the project backed the Hyperliquid Policy Center in Washington, D.C. Fortune reported that the initiative is focused on helping create legal pathways for decentralized perpetual derivatives in the U.S., backed by a donation valued around $28 million. That move is strategically rational. If you are already a dominant offshore or extra-jurisdictional liquidity venue, the next value driver is not merely more volume. It is regulatory survivability. Hyperliquid’s policy spend suggests the project understands that its future valuation may depend as much on legal legibility as on throughput, spreads, or token burns. FinTelegram’s Compliance Take Hyperliquid deserves the praise it is getting on performance. On publicly available data, it has built one of the most profitable and capital-efficient businesses in crypto. It has deep liquidity, large open interest, powerful token value capture, and a technology stack that the market clearly values. In pure business terms, Hyperliquid has already crossed from interesting DeFi experiment into serious financial infrastructure contender. But that is exactly why the compliance question becomes unavoidable. The larger Hyperliquid gets, the less plausible it becomes to treat it simply as an innocuous software layer. A venue that processes hundreds of billions in monthly perpetual volume, offers leveraged exposure, develops tradfi-linked products, and supports a native token with multibillion-dollar market value is no longer operating in a regulatory blind spot by default. It is operating in a regulatory waiting room. The present situation can be summarized in one line: Hyperliquid has already achieved exchange-scale economics without yet presenting exchange-scale licensing disclosure. That mismatch is the key issue for regulators, counterparties, institutional allocators, and serious compliance officers. Conclusion Hyperliquid may well be the most impressive financial startup in crypto today if measured by revenue efficiency, profit generation, and market traction. The numbers support the hype. But the next stage of the story will not be decided only by volume, fees, or token price. It will be decided by whether Hyperliquid can convert extraordinary commercial success into a durable regulatory position before supervisors decide to define the platform for themselves. For now, Hyperliquid looks like a billion-dollar DeFi cash machine with an unresolved license problem. That is both the source of its edge and the source of its risk. Whistle42 Call to Action FinTelegram invites whistleblowers, current and former employees, developers, compliance specialists, counterparties, market makers, and affected users to report information on Hyperliquid, offshore derivatives access, geofencing circumvention, sanctions controls, market-structure risks, hidden control points, or any other regulatory violations in the cyberfinance segment and crypto scene. If you have evidence, report it securely via the Whistle42 whistleblower platform. Share Information via Whistle42

Why Is IPO Genie the Most watched Crypto Presale of 2026 Right Now? IPO Genie under Phase 82 is buzzing as the top crypto presale! Over 12.7 billion $IPO tokens have already been sold. That’s like selling out a huge concert before the doors even open. Think of it as grabbing your ticket early while prices are still low. In April 2026, even when Bitcoin dipped and markets felt shaky, people kept buying IPO Genie. This AI-powered platform helps you find cool private market deals. The $IPO token runs on Ethereum and has a big total supply of 437 billion. Remember: This is not financial advice. Crypto is risky, you can lose all your money. Only invest what you can afford to lose. 12.7 Billion Tokens Sold: Crypto Presale Tokens Sold in 2026 Hits New Highs Numbers can be confusing. So let us break this down simply. IPO Genie $IPO raised nearly $1.5 million in presale funding from over 2,200+ wallets and sold more than 12 billion $IPO tokens across 65+ presale stages. What does this tell us? It tells us that over 2,200 different people put money in. That is not manipulation by one huge buyer. That is spread-out interest. But again, more investors do not mean the price will go up. Markets change. Projects fail. Even with many buyers, a token can drop to zero after listing. The 437 billion total token supply matters too (check out the image of token allocations and tier system for details). With so many tokens, the price per token starts very low. Private markets hold over $3 trillion in value. Less than 1% of retail investors have access. That is the real problem IPO Genie is trying to solve. IPO Genie Presale Phase 82: How It Works and Why Investors Are Joining The project describes itself clearly: IPO Genie helps users evaluate private-market data in a more transparent, structured way. Here is what this phase means in plain words: When a company like Uber was still private, regular people could not buy in. Only rich funds could. Uber grew from $5 billion to $70 billion while locked away. Regular investors missed all those gains. IPO Genie wants to change this scenario. It uses AI tools to find and track private companies before they go public. Then it lets you buy tokens that represent a piece of those deals. The process is straightforward: visit buy.ipogenie.ai, connect a wallet like MetaMask, and purchase using ETH or USDT. No accreditation paperwork is needed. A 20% welcome bonus and 15% referral bonus are active during the current window. But let us be clear about risk: The platform is still being built. Most features are on the roadmap, not live yet. This is an early-stage project. Early-stage projects often hit delays, fail to deliver, or never launch the features they promise. Best Presale Projects Comparison: IPO Genie vs Other Top Contenders In 2026, several presale projects are competing for attention. How does IPO Genie stack up? Feature IPO Genie BlockchainFX Ozak AI Funding Raised $1.5M $14M Not published Tokens Distributed 12.7B Varies Varies Smart Contract Audits CertiK + SolidProof Yes Audited Focus Area Private market access via AI Multi-asset trading Predictive analytics Beta Status Mostly roadmap Live across multiple countries 42,000+ beta users Risk Level High High High Important Note: All presales carry extreme risk. This table is for information only. Past audits do not prevent future failures or fraud. Top AI Presale to Invest in 2026: Real Utility Beyond Hype Top AI crypto projects are hot right now. Market capitalization in the AI token segment increased from approximately $14.13 billion to $19 billion during March, indicating a shift in capital allocation within the sector. This is a real activity. But activity does not mean profit. IPO Genie Vault claims to have real AI that works. IPO Genie publicly flagged Redwood AI Corp before its public listing on February 6, 2026. This is a timestamped, verifiable claim. This is a positive sign. It means the AI tools might actually function. But one correct call does not prove future success. Even professional investors get predictions wrong all the time. Strong Investor Demand in April 2026: What 12.7B Tokens Sold Really Means When thousands of people buy something, what does that mean? It means interest exists. It does not mean the price will go up. Think about movie tickets. If a movie sells many advance tickets, it might mean the movie is good. Or it might mean the marketing worked really well. The ticket sales do not guarantee you will enjoy the film. Same with tokens. Presale sales numbers show interest. They do not show that the project will succeed. Key Takeaways IPO Genie reports more than 12.7 billion tokens distributed during presale from 2,200+ wallets. The project raised nearly $1.5 million and has smart contracts audited by CertiK and SolidProof. The project targets private market tokenization, a real market trend worth $27 billion as of April 2026. Critical Risk: Token prices can drop to zero after listing. Most presale projects fail to deliver. No exchange listing confirmed yet. Speculative Note: Claims about 1,000x returns are marketing talk, not promises. Past AI signals do not guarantee future performance. Truth: Only invest what you can completely lose. Best Crypto Presale for Gains: Staking and Rewards System Explained IPO Genie offers staking. This means you lock up tokens and earn more as a reward. But here is the honest part: Staking rewards are variable. Rewards are variable and not guaranteed. Why? Rewards come from the fees that users pay. If few users join, rewards drop. If the project fails, rewards stop. Visit IPO Genie Presale Link to see the live presale dashboard before the next price increase. [caption id="attachment_206526" align="aligncenter" width="2048"] Official Channels: | Telegram | X – Community[/caption] Frequently Asked Questions Q1: Is IPO Genie ($IPO) a real project or a scam? Based on available evidence, IPO Genie appears to be a real project with published audits, a disclosed team, and verifiable presale activity. However, being real does not mean it will succeed. Many real projects fail due to poor execution, lack of adoption, or changing market conditions. Always conduct your research. Q2: Can I really make 1,000x returns with IPO Genie? No. These claims are marketing language, not guarantees. Most presale tokens do not deliver massive returns. Many deliver negative returns. Token value depends on adoption, competition, regulatory changes, and market conditions. Presales are highly speculative. Q3: What happens if I buy $IPO tokens now and they drop after listing? This is completely possible. Presale tokens often drop in value after exchange listing. You could lose most or all of your investment. This is normal even in the best crypto presales, not unusual. Only invest money you can completely afford to lose. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency and presales are highly speculative and risky. Consult a licensed financial advisor before investing any money. Do your own research. Verify all claims independently.

Robert Pemble has been named head of US equity trading at Invesco, stepping up to the role after 22 years at the asset manager.  He initially joined the firm in 2004 as a senior equity trader, working for Oppenheimer Funds before the company was acquired by Invesco in 2019. The new position marks a promotion for New York-based Pemble, who most recently spent two years as head of quantitative equity trading at the firm. Pemble has worked extensively across capital markets for more than two decades, and prior to his time at Invesco, held various equity trading roles at firms spanning Caldwell & Orkin Funds, Bulldog Capital, Hovde Capital Advisors and William R. Hough & Co.  Pemble confirmed his appointment in an announcement on social media.  Invesco had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.  The appointment follows further significant senior promotions for Invesco, with Samuel Henderson stepping into the role of head of EMEA equity trading in January 2026.  Henderson’s promotion followed the departure of the firm’s head of trading – EMEA and APAC equities, Paul Squires in November 2025, as revealed by The TRADE at the time.  The post Invesco promotes internally for new US equity trading head appeared first on The TRADE.