Google has reportedly restricted Meta’s access to its Gemini AI models after the social media giant requested more computing capacity than Google could provide. The move highlights the mounting infrastructure challenges even the world’s biggest AI companies are facing as demand for generative AI continues to rise.According to a Financial Times report, Google informed Meta around March that it could not fulfill the company’s full request for Gemini capacity, disrupting some of Meta’s internal AI projects. Reuters has not independently verified the report.Compute Shortage Hits AI ExpansionThe report says Meta has been affected more than other Google Cloud customers because of its unusually high demand for Gemini models. The restrictions have reportedly delayed several internal projects that rely on Google’s AI infrastructure.In response, Meta has encouraged employees to use AI tokens more efficiently. AI tokens measure how much computing power AI applications consume, making them a key factor in managing large-scale AI workloads.Meta Pushes Ahead with its Own AI StrategyMeta has used Gemini for content moderation, scam detection, customer service, advertising tools, and software development. It is said that Meta began using Gemini because it outperformed some of its own AI models on certain tasks.Nonetheless, Meta has recently been moving some of its workloads from Gemini to its own Muse Spark model, thereby reducing its dependence on external AI providers while still investing billions of dollars in building its infrastructure.Also Read: Android TV vs Google TV Review: Which Smart TV Platform is Worth Buying?AI Infrastructure Emerges as Next BattlegroundThe reported restrictions reflect a broader challenge across the AI industry. Companies are investing billions in chips, servers, and data centers, yet demand for AI computing continues to outpace supply.Google has previously acknowledged that limited computing capacity has constrained growth in its cloud business despite strong customer demand. If the report is accurate, the latest development suggests that access to AI infrastructure is becoming as strategically important as the AI models themselves, with compute power emerging as one of the industry’s most valuable resources. Neither Google nor Meta has publicly commented on the report.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

AI-generated movies are moving beyond tech demos, with full-length films and festival entries proving AI can now create surprisingly realistic cinematic visuals.Most AI films are hybrid productions, where AI helps with scripts, storyboards, VFX, and editing while human filmmakers shape the story and emotions.AI excels at creating stunning visuals quickly, but it still struggles with believable characters, emotional depth, and strong storytelling without human guidance.Low-budget creators are using AI tools to produce impressive films for just a few thousand dollars, making filmmaking more affordable than ever before.Studios are already using AI for dubbing, voice enhancement, digital effects, and background characters, but human actors remain essential for leading roles.The future of AI cinema is likely hybrid, combining human creativity with AI-powered production. Fully AI-made blockbuster movies are still largely experimental.Read More Stories Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:India's sub-Rs. 5000 garment steamer segment has shifted from brand loyalty to genuine spec competition, with Inalsa, Agaro, and USHA now matching or beating Philips on tank size and steam output.Six current models, each compared on wattage, tank capacity, and street price rather than printed MRP, cover nearly every household routine in this price band.A simple framework ties steamer type to routine: compact handhelds for quick touch-ups, larger tanks for full wardrobe sessions, and gentler settings for silk and embroidered fabric.India's garment steamer market spent years selling convenience above performance. That changed fast. Brands competing under Rs. 5000 are now packing in tank sizes, wattage, and steam output that used to sit two price tiers higher, turning a once-simple gadget category into a genuine specifications race.Five years ago, a budget steamer in India meant a small tank, modest wattage, and not much else. Philips dominated in reputation more than in raw capability. The latest lineup looks different. Inalsa, Agaro and USHA now match or beat Philips on tank size and steam output at a fraction of the price, while Hamilton Beach sells a 1740W turbo model at a street price under Rs. 3,500 despite carrying a printed MRP near Rs. 7,000. Competition has pushed real value into a price band that once rewarded brand loyalty over specifications.What Rs. 5000 Actually BuysThree numbers separate a steamer worth buying from one that only looks good on a shelf. A wattage between 1200W and 1700W handles cotton and linen cleanly, while anything under 1000W struggles with heavier weaves. Tank size sets how long a session lasts: 100ml gives 5 to 8 minutes of steam, enough for two shirts, while 300ml to 340ml stretches past 12 minutes and covers five or six garments. Heat-up time matters most on rushed mornings, and the better models in this range warm up in 20 to 45 seconds. Auto shut-off and boil-dry protection round out the list, separating appliances built for daily use from ones built only to hit a price point.Top Picks ComparedSix current models clearly map out the segment.Philips STH3000/20Philips' compact handheld remains the most recognised name in the segment, backed by wide service support across Indian cities. Its 1000W motor and 100ml tank are suited to one or two garments at a time, with a 30-second heat-up that favors speed over capacity. Price: Rs. 2,800 to Rs. 3,500. BUY NOWAgaro SignifyAgaro's Signify pairs a 1500W motor with a 260ml tank and a ceramic steam nozzle, giving it more raw capacity than the Philips entry model at a lower street price. Vertical and horizontal steaming cover hanging garments and flat touch-ups alike. Price: Rs. 2,100 to Rs. 2,200 on current offers. BUY NOWInalsa CosicosyThe Cosicosy carries the largest tank of any handheld in this group at 340 ml, enough for five to six garments before a refill. Its 1600W motor and 25g/min steam output handle cotton and linen comfortably, and dry boiling protection adds a safety margin for daily use. Price: around Rs. 2,300 on Amazon.BUY NOWUSHA Techne Direct 2000USHA's Techne Direct 2000 matches the Inalsa on power, with 1600W and 28 g/min output, and a 320 ml tank that lands just below it. Auto shut-off after 20 minutes adds peace of mind for households that tend to forget appliances running. Price: Rs. 3,100 to Rs. 4,990, depending on ongoing offers.BUY NOWHamilton Beach ProfessionalThis is the most powerful handheld on the list at 1740W, with a turbo mode built for stubborn creases and a 300ml tank that covers a full session. The printed MRP of Rs. 6,999 is misleading on its own, since the steamer typically sells for Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 3,500 online. Buying at the discounted price, not the sticker price, is what makes this one a budget pick. BUY NOWMorphy Richards Steam EliteMorphy Richards' handheld model runs at 1200W with an 18g/min output and a 25-second heat-up, among the fastest in this group. Its 110 ml tank is the smallest here relative to price, so it suits quick single-garment sessions better than a full wardrobe routine. Price: Rs. 3,400 to Rs. 4,500. BUY NOWWhat a Budget Steamer Won't DoA budget steamer has limits worth knowing before checkout. Thick denim, heavy upholstery fabric, and multi-layered formal suits still come out sharper with a flat iron. Tanks under 150ml run dry after two or three garments, so a full wardrobe session often needs a midway refill. None of these models replaces a standing steamer for households running through ten or more garments a day; that job calls for a higher tier with a built-in hanger and a tank above 800ml. Inside those boundaries, a budget steamer still covers the bulk of everyday wear: shirts, kurtas, sarees, dresses, and curtains.Matching the Steamer to the WardrobeThe right pick depends less on brand and more on routine. Someone steaming one or two garments before heading out gets more value from a compact, fast-heating model like the Philips STH3000/20 than from raw tank capacity. A household working through five or more garments most days benefits from the Inalsa Cosicosy or USHA Techne Direct 2000, where the larger tank means fewer refills. Silk sarees and embroidered fabric respond better to a steamer with an adjustable head and a gentler default setting than to the highest wattage on the shelf. Frequent travelers tend to favor the lightest, most foldable option, even if that means trading down on tank size.Also Read: Best Steam Irons in 2026: Tried-and-Tested Picks for Fast, Crease-Free ResultsWhere the Segment is HeadedThis shift toward feature parity at lower prices looks set to continue. As more Indian brands manufacture locally and compete directly with imported names, the gap between a Rs. 2,000 steamer and a Rs. 5,000 one keeps narrowing on paper specifications, even as service support and build longevity remain the real differentiators. For buyers, the smartest move is comparing actual numbers rather than assuming that a premium price guarantees premium performance.Also Read:  Top AI-Powered Laundry RobotsThe Buying FrameworkThree simple questions settle most purchases in this category. Quick daily touch-ups for one or two garments call for a compact, fast-heating handheld such as the Philips STH3000/20. A fuller wardrobe routine calls for the largest tank on offer, currently the Inalsa Cosicosy at 340ml. Stubborn creases and heavier cotton call for a high-wattage pick like the Hamilton Beach Professional, bought at its street price rather than its printed MRP. Matching the steamer to the routine, not the name on the box, is what turns a sub-Rs. 5000 purchase of a good one.Final Thought Budget garment steamers have become far more capable with improving technology. The best choice is the one that matches your wardrobe and routine. Focus on real performance, tank capacity, and steam output instead of relying on brand names or inflated MRPs.You May Also Like:Best Tumble Dryers in 2026: Complete Buying Guide for Every HouseholdClothes Dryer vs. Washer-Dryer Combo: Which is Better?10 Best Dehumidifiers for Drying Clothes in 2025FAQ’s1. Which is the best garment steamer under Rs. 5000 in India in 2026?The best garment steamer depends on your needs. Brands such as Philips, Agaro, Hamilton Beach, and Morphy Richards offer reliable handheld and compact models with fast heat-up times, good steam output, and practical safety features within this budget.2. Are handheld garment steamers better than traditional irons?Handheld garment steamers are ideal for quick wrinkle removal, delicate fabrics, and vertical steaming. However, traditional irons are better for creating sharp creases and handling heavy fabrics like denim or thick cotton.3. What features should I look for in a budget garment steamer?Prioritize fast heat-up time, adequate water tank capacity, consistent steam output, vertical steaming support, automatic shut-off, boil-dry protection, and a lightweight design for comfortable everyday use.4. Can a garment steamer be used on all types of fabrics?Most garment steamers are safe for fabrics such as cotton, linen, silk, polyester, rayon, and wool when used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Always check the garment care label before steaming delicate materials.5. Is a garment steamer under Rs. 5000 suitable for everyday home use?Yes. Most garment steamers in this price range are designed for daily touch-ups, office wear, dresses, sarees, and light household use. They offer a practical balance of affordability, convenience, and performance for regular clothing care.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

OverviewGarena has released fresh Free Fire MAX redeem codes for June 28, allowing players to claim exciting in-game rewards without spending diamonds.The latest codes unlock premium skins, weapon loot crates, vouchers, character bundles, emotes, and other exclusive collectibles.Players should redeem the active codes as early as possible since they are available for a limited period and expire after redemption limits are reached.Free Fire MAX gamers have yet another chance to get hold of premium in-game prizes because new redeem codes have been rolled out for June 28, 2026. With these time-limited codes, gamers can redeem premium items such as weapon skins, exclusive bundles, vouchers, emotes, and more at no cost.This latest set of rewards is perfect for gamers who want to enhance their existing collection of items, skin their character, and access premium content. As each code is available in limited supply, it is recommended that gamers use these rewards before they expire.Free Fire MAX Redeem Codes for June 28, 2026The above is a list of the recently available Garena Free Fire MAX redeem codes for the Indian server:FFSGT7KNFQ2X – Weapon SkinsFPSTQ7MXNPY5 – Loot Crates4N8M2XL9R1G3 – Diamonds/VouchersH8YC4TN6VKQ9 – Pet Skins/FoodFF6YH3BFD7VT – In-game CurrencyB1RK7C5ZL8YT – Character Bundles4ST1ZTBZBRP9 – Gloo Wall SkinsBR43FMAPYEZZ – Special EmotesUPQ7X5NMJ64V – Weapon Loot CratesS9QK2L6VP3MR – Gun SkinsFFRSX4CYHLLQ – Premium RewardsFFSKTXVQF2NR – Exclusive CosmeticsFFDMNSW9KG2 – Character RewardsFFCBRAXQTS9S – Exclusive RewardsFFR4G3HM5YJN – Bundle Vouchers6KWMFJVMQQYG – Miscellaneous RewardsFollow these steps:Visit the official Garena Rewards Redemption website.Log in using your linked account through Facebook, Google, Apple ID, X, Huawei ID, or VK.Enter one of the active redeem codes in the text field.Click Confirm to submit the code.Successful rewards will be delivered to your in-game mailbox within 24 hours.Important: Guest accounts cannot redeem rewards. Make sure your game account is linked before attempting redemption.Final TakeRedeem codes of the day remain to be one of the simplest methods by which Free Fire MAX players earn premium rewards without buying any diamonds. With reward options ranging from weapon skins, character bundles, to vouchers and exclusive cosmetics, there are several chances that you can capitalize on.Since each redeem code expires and only a limited number of items can be redeemed, taking your time may mean missing out on some great rewards. It is advisable to redeem all available rewards to ensure success.Ensure to look for new codes each day and make use of the Garena Rewards Redemption portal to gain as many in-game rewards as possible.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:IFB offers reliable washing machines under Rs. 30,000 with inverter motors, hard water treatment, and multiple wash programs, making this price range genuinely capable rather than entry-level.Capacity and machine type matter more than RPM or program count when choosing a washing machine that suits your household's actual laundry habits.Matching the right model to your household size and washing frequency delivers better long-term value than buying the highest-capacity or most feature-heavy option available.Most washing machine buyers spend too much time comparing spin speeds and too little time thinking about what they actually need. At Rs. 30,000, IFB gives you enough choice to get that decision right. The range covers front loaders built for fabric care, top loaders designed for family volume, and mid-range options that quietly deliver reliable performance without asking for attention. The models reviewed here represent the clearest options at this budget, chosen for how well they hold up in real daily use rather than how well they read on a spec sheet.Why Rs. 30,000 is a Sweet Spot for IFB Washing MachinesBuyers at this price point do not have to give up the features that make a genuine difference. IFB washing machines under Rs. 30,000 regularly include inverter motors, multiple wash programs, hard water treatment, and energy-efficient operation as standard rather than as upgrades. The goal of this budget is straightforward: find a model that handles your actual laundry load consistently without paying for features your household will never use.Quick ComparisonBest Overall: TL801MG1IDTL801MG1ID earns the top spot by doing the things that matter most, consistently and without fuss. At 8 kg, it handles a typical family's weekly laundry without requiring repeat cycles. Wash performance stays reliable across fabric types, from everyday cotton to heavier loads. IFB's service network adds confidence that most brands at this price cannot match, and the warranty terms hold up well in this segment. It is not the cheapest model here, but it offers the clearest balance of price, capacity, wash quality, and long-term reliability.BUY NOWBest Front Load Option: IFB Diva GXN 6010Front-loaders ask for more patience per cycle and return better fabric care over time. The IFB Diva GXN 6010 suits couples and smaller households that prioritise gentle washing, lower water consumption, and reduced running costs over speed and simplicity.The advantages of choosing a front loader are practical rather than theoretical. They use less water per cycle, handle delicate fabrics more carefully, and tend to clean heavily soiled clothes more thoroughly. The trade-offs are worth understanding before buying. Cycles run longer than top loaders, low-suds detergent is required, and mid-cycle additions are not possible. For households where fabric longevity and energy costs matter more than quick turnaround, the Diva GXN 6010 makes a strong case at its price.BUY NOWBest Top Load for Families: IFB TL900NB2SLarge households need a machine that keeps pace without constant reruns. The IFB TL900NB2S handles 9 kg per cycle, cutting the number of loads needed each week and reducing the time spent managing laundry across busy days.The wash programs cover the practical range of family laundry without requiring adjustments each time. Controls are straightforward enough for multiple family members to use without guidance. For households regularly washing for four or more people, getting the capacity right from the start saves more frustration than any individual feature ever could.BUY NOWBest Budget Pick: IFB TL701AG1Value for money is not the same as the lowest price. The IFB TL701AG1 costs less than most models in this comparison and earns its place here by delivering dependable everyday performance rather than simply undercutting the competition.At 7 kg, it suits small families and households that wash regularly without dealing with heavy or oversized loads. It covers essential wash programs, handles hard water adequately, and carries the IFB service network behind it. For buyers who want a machine that works reliably without stretching the budget further than needed, this is the one to consider.BUY NOWWhich Capacity Should You Choose?Capacity shapes your daily laundry routine more than any other single decision. Getting it wrong costs time every week for as long as you own the machine. A 6 kg machine suits singles and couples with manageable weekly loads. A 7 kg machine works well for small families of three, covering daily clothes without difficulty. An 8 kg machine handles the needs of most households and manages the occasional larger load without strain. A 9 kg machine is built for large families that wash regularly and in volume, where a smaller capacity would mean running the machine twice a day. Choose the load your household actually generates, not the maximum you might occasionally face.What Actually Matters More Than SpecificationsSpecification sheets can send buyers in the wrong direction. Spin speed and wash program count attract attention, but they rarely determine whether a washing machine suits a household over three to five years of daily use.The factors that hold up over time are less exciting and more important. Capacity shapes your routine more than any other specification. The choice between front load and top load affects water use, fabric care, and cycle time with every single wash. Hard water compatibility matters across much of India and deserves confirmation before purchase. Energy ratings determine running costs, not just purchase price. IFB's service network is one of its genuine strengths in this segment, and warranty terms are worth reading carefully. Settle these questions first. Check specifications only after.Also Read: Best 8 Kg Fully Automatic Top-Load Washing Machines with HeaterProduct ComparisonAlso Read: Top Top-Load Washing Machines with Smart Inverter TechnologyFinal ThoughtsThe best IFB washing machine under Rs. 30,000 is not the one with the most programs or the highest spin speed. It is the one that fits how your household actually does laundry. A large family washing daily needs capacity above all else. A couple that values fabric care and lower running costs will get more from a front loader. A small household on a sensible budget needs reliability more than features.Getting that match right from the start delivers better value over five years than buying the most expensive model in the range and hoping the extra specifications justify themselves over time.You May Also Like:Best Samsung Washing Machines Under Rs. 40000Best Bosch Washing Machines Under Rs. 40,000Upgrade Your Laundry Game: Big Washing Machine Deals on Amazon This WeekendFrequently Asked Questions1. Which is the best IFB washing machine under Rs. 30,000?The best IFB washing machine depends on your household size, laundry frequency, and preferred features. Buyers should compare capacity, wash programs, energy efficiency, and machine type before making a decision.2. Is a front-load IFB washing machine worth buying under Rs. 30,000?Yes. IFB offers front-load models in this price range that provide better fabric care, efficient water usage, and superior wash performance, making them a good choice for regular laundry needs.3. What capacity IFB washing machine should I choose?A 6–7 kg model is suitable for singles or couples, while an 8 kg washing machine is ideal for most families. Larger households may benefit from a 9 kg model if available within the budget.4. Are IFB washing machines energy efficient?Most modern IFB washing machines include inverter technology and energy-efficient designs that help reduce electricity and water consumption. Always check the appliance's energy rating before purchasing.5. Which features matter most when buying an IFB washing machine under Rs. 30,000?Capacity, machine type (front load or top load), inverter motor, wash programs, hard water compatibility, warranty, and after-sales service are more important than simply comparing the number of features.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Instagram is testing new features that could give users more control over the content its algorithm recommends, as its parent company, Meta, seeks to make the platform’s recommendation system more transparent and personalized.Instagram head Adam Mosseri said the company is expanding its ‘Your Algorithm’ initiative, which lets users view and adjust the interests that influence what appears in their feed. The feature, initially introduced for Reels and Explore, is now being tested for broader use across the app.More Ways to Shape RecommendationsIn addition to editing the topics one likes, the upcoming update also gives users other ways to influence the recommendations by allowing them to shape suggestions through influencers, content types, moods, and even interests.In essence, a user can tell Instagram he would like to see more travel videos, fewer fitness images, or more from particular influencers. According to Instagram, these new features are supposed to take into consideration users’ changing interests, not just their past habits of watching certain videos.It should be noted that this feature continues the company’s efforts to increase understanding of its recommendation process. Previously, users had to guess what made a particular post recommended to them; now, Instagram seeks to simplify this process.AI Powers New ExperienceMeta is also relying on LLMs to categorize posts by theme, allowing users to change their preferences as they wish. This would mean that the user wouldn’t have to deal with complicated algorithms but rather with categories that can be modified, deleted, or added as needed.According to Mosseri, the main objective of developing the system was to give people the power to control their Instagram experience.Also Read: Meta Sued in Netherlands: VNLOK Takes Facebook, Instagram to Court Over Unlicensed Betting AdsSocial Media TrendThis is indicative of a trend on social media sites to give users greater control over their recommendation systems. In light of the growing debate over algorithmically curated feeds, companies have been offering users reasons why certain material is shown to them and giving them some influence over future recommendations.There are no details about Instagram’s global launch of this feature, but it can be assumed that user-based recommendations will play an important role in Instagram’s future.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Gold prices increased in major cities of India on Sunday, June 28, in both their 22-carat and 24-carat forms. This increase has been fueled by bullish sentiment in the global gold market and local purchasing demand.As per the latest price quotes, 24-carat gold was available at Rs. 1,43,390 per 10 grams in Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, and Kolkata, up Rs. 440 from the previous day. 22-carat gold gained Rs. 410 and is available at Rs. 1,31,350 per 10 grams.Chennai Records Highest Rates Chennai remained the most expensive major metro city in India. While the price of 24-carat gold hit Rs. 1,43,830 per 10 grams, that of 22-carat gold stood at Rs. 1,31,750 per 10 grams. Gold prices in Ahmedabad also increased, following the general trend.Jewelers say that although retail prices track international market trends, variations may arise due to taxes, margins, and city surcharges.How to Confirm the Quality of Gold before BuyingHere is one way to ensure your jewelry is genuine: buy pieces that carry a hallmark. Here are things you need to know:Your jewelry should bear the BIS hallmark, indicating the purity of the gold in India.The quality of gold can be 24K (99.9%), 22K (91.6%), or 18K (75%).Another thing you have to check out in your jewelry is the HUID number.Receipt shows the quality, weight, and cost incurred.Buy jewelry from BIS-accredited jewelers.Also Read: Gold Price Today: Commodity Markets Remain Closed for the Morning Session, Gold Falls Below $4,000Why Do Gold Prices Fluctuate Every Day?International developments and local factors drive gold rates. On the global side, when bullion prices wobble, the USD index shifts, people start expecting different interest rates, inflation moves, or geopolitical tensions get louder, investor demand for gold often changes, sometimes pretty fast. Locally, too, the same kind of movement happens but through different channels. Gold prices depend on the rupee exchange rate, customs duty, GST, transportation charges, and even seasonal demand around weddings or other festival times. In addition, central bank buying activity and broader global investment flows can also nudge gold prices. So, because all these things can change every day, gold prices get recalibrated accordingly across different cities.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:Freezer placement shapes daily kitchen convenience more than any other refrigerator design decision, and the better layout depends entirely on how a household shops and cooks.Bottom freezer refrigerators reduce physical effort for frequent cooks by keeping fresh food at eye level, while top freezer models offer better value and familiar organisation for budget-conscious households.Energy efficiency depends far more on compressor technology and insulation quality than freezer location, making appliance ratings a more reliable buying guide than layout alone.Most people spend more time thinking about refrigerator size than refrigerator layout. That is usually a mistake. Where the freezer sits changes how comfortable your kitchen feels every single day, how often you bend and reach, and how naturally your grocery routine falls into place. Cooling performance rarely determines whether a refrigerator feels convenient to use, but freezer placement often does.Bottom Freezer vs Top Freezer Refrigerators at a GlanceTwo Layouts, Two Different PrioritiesTop freezer refrigerators put frozen food at eye level and fresh food below. It is the arrangement most households grew up with, and it works well for anyone who relies on frozen meals, stocks up on bulk frozen goods, or simply prefers the familiar. The layout is straightforward, the shelving is open, and large frozen packages fit without much effort.Bottom freezer refrigerators reverse that layout. Fresh food sits at eye level. Fruits, vegetables, dairy, leftovers, and drinks are all within easy reach without bending. For households that cook regularly and visit the refrigerator section constantly throughout the day, that single ergonomic shift matters more than any feature listed on the product label.The choice is not about which design is superior. It is about which one fits the way your household actually uses food.Storage That Matches How You CookNeither layout organises food better in an absolute sense. They organise it differently, and the right system depends on your habits.Top freezer models use open shelves in the freezer compartment, which makes it easy to see everything at once and stack large packages without rearranging. The refrigerator section follows a shelf arrangement that most people can navigate without thinking.Bottom freezer refrigerators typically use pull-out drawers with divided sections. This works well for separating proteins, vegetables, prepared meals, and frozen desserts without creating a cluttered pile. Large frozen items can occasionally be harder to fit in drawer-based systems than on open shelves, which is worth considering for households that buy in bulk. Each layout supports different food storage habits rather than offering a universally better solution. The Energy Efficiency QuestionFreezer location plays a smaller role in energy consumption than most buyers assume. Compressor quality, insulation thickness, and temperature management systems matter far more. Top freezer refrigerators have historically performed well on energy consumption, partly because of their simpler construction and airflow design.Today, that efficiency gap is much smaller. Modern bottom freezer models with inverter compressors and improved insulation now perform comparably in most real-world conditions. When evaluating running costs, Energy Star certifications and published energy ratings give a more accurate picture than freezer placement alone.What the Price Difference Actually ReflectsTop freezer refrigerators cost less, and the gap is real. Their simpler engineering and fewer specialised components keep purchase prices down. For buyers who want reliable, no-fuss performance without a high upfront investment, they remain one of the strongest value options available.Bottom freezer refrigerators carry a higher price, and most of that premium reflects the pull-out drawer system and ergonomic layout rather than better cooling technology. The additional cost buys convenience, not superior refrigeration.Also Read: Top Single-Door Refrigerators for Compact KitchensMatching the Refrigerator to Your LifeHouseholds that cook frequently and access fresh food throughout the day are likely to appreciate a bottom freezer layout. Households that prioritise frozen food storage, prefer a familiar design, or are working within a tighter budget often find top freezer models more practical and comfortable over the long term.Also Read: Best French Door Refrigerators in India 2026: Premium PicksWhich Refrigerator Fits You?The debate between bottom-freezer and top-freezer refrigerators is not about one design replacing the other. Both have earned their place in kitchens for sound reasons. Bottom freezer models reduce the physical effort of daily cooking. Top freezer models offer simplicity, reliability, and honest value. Understanding how your household shops, stores, and prepares food is a more reliable guide than comparing specifications alone.There is no universally better refrigerator layout. Bottom freezer and top freezer designs solve different problems. The right choice depends on your everyday habits, accessibility needs, and budget. You May Also Like:Top Double-Door Refrigerators for Modern KitchensIFB vs LG Washing Machines: Which is Better in 2026?Home Inverter Buying Guide 2026: How to Choose the Right Inverter for Your HomeFrequently Asked Questions1. Is a bottom freezer refrigerator better than a top freezer refrigerator?Neither is universally better. Bottom freezer refrigerators offer easier access to fresh food, while top freezer models are typically more affordable and better suited for households that use frozen foods more frequently.2. Which refrigerator layout is more energy efficient?Energy efficiency depends more on the refrigerator's compressor, insulation, and energy rating than freezer placement alone. Modern bottom freezer and top freezer refrigerators can both deliver excellent energy performance.3. Why do bottom freezer refrigerators usually cost more?Bottom freezer refrigerators often include pull-out drawer systems, ergonomic layouts, and premium finishes. The higher price mainly reflects added convenience and design rather than better cooling performance.4. Are top freezer refrigerators better for storing frozen food?For many households, yes. Top freezer refrigerators typically provide open shelf layouts that make it easier to store and access large frozen items compared with drawer-based freezer compartments.5. Which refrigerator layout is best for families?Families that cook fresh meals regularly often prefer bottom freezer refrigerators because fresh food stays at eye level. Households that prioritize affordability or buy frozen food in bulk may find top freezer refrigerators a better fit.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:Fire-Boltt's latest AMOLED lineup spans five watches built around different priorities: calling, design, formal styling, daily use, and fitnessThe Visionary leads as the most balanced overall pick, while the Legacy and Quantum target style and formal wearThe Legacy Nova suits everyday notification-heavy use, and the Axiom is built around serious workout trackingThe smartwatch market has moved faster than most buyers give it credit for. Features that once felt out of reach are now sitting comfortably in the affordable segment, and AMOLED displays are the clearest example of that shift. Not long ago, you had to spend serious money to get a screen worth looking at. Today, Fire-Boltt puts AMOLED technology into watches that most people can actually afford. The moment you see one in person, the difference is obvious. Colors are richer, blacks look genuinely dark, text is crisp and easy to read, and the screen holds up in direct sunlight in a way that standard LCD panels simply never could.Fire-Boltt AMOLED Smartwatches in 2026: Complete ComparisonThe Display That Changes EverythingAMOLED panels work on a fundamentally different principle than traditional LCD screens. Each pixel produces its own light, giving the display deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors. In everyday use, this translates to a screen that is comfortable to read indoors, holds up well under direct sunlight, and feels polished regardless of what you paid for it. Fire-Boltt has put this technology at the center of its latest smartwatch lineup, and the watches reflect that commitment in ways that are easy to notice from the first time you use one.Finding an AMOLED smartwatch is not difficult, as the market offers plenty of options. The real challenge is finding the one that actually fits the exact lifestyle. Each watch in the lineup focuses on a different priority, making it easier to choose the right one. Pick the wrong one, and you end up with features that sound good on paper but never get used. Pick the right one, and the watch becomes something you reach for without thinking every single morning.Fire-Boltt Visionary: The Safest All-Round ChoiceThe Fire-Boltt Visionary is the model most buyers should consider first. It combines Bluetooth calling, health monitoring, smart notifications, and a sharp AMOLED display in a package that works across different daily situations. It suits first-time smartwatch buyers, everyday users, and anyone who wants one device that handles work, fitness, and personal use without compromise. No single feature dominates the experience. That balance is exactly what makes it the strongest all-around option in the lineup.BUY NOWFire-Boltt Legacy: When Design Matters as Much as FunctionThe Fire-Boltt Legacy is built for buyers who treat a watch as a style statement. Its slim profile, lightweight construction, and refined finish set it apart from the bulkier smartwatches that dominate the budget segment. The AMOLED display adds to that premium feel by delivering richer colours and sharper contrast. Worn to an office meeting or a weekend outing, the Legacy holds its own against watches that cost considerably more. Style-conscious buyers and office professionals will find it difficult to look past.BUY NOWFire-Boltt Quantum: Built for the BoardroomMost smartwatches look like fitness trackers regardless of the occasion. The Fire-Boltt Quantum breaks that pattern. Its metal construction and classic round dial give it a traditional watch aesthetic that fits naturally in formal settings. Business professionals who want smart features without sacrificing a polished appearance will find the Quantum far more appropriate than anything sporty. Bluetooth calling and an AMOLED display round out a package that works as well in a client meeting as it does during a daily commute.BUY NOWFire-Boltt Legacy Nova: The Practical Daily CompanionThe Fire-Boltt Legacy Nova is designed around visibility and ease of use. Its larger AMOLED display makes notifications, health data, and incoming call information easier to read throughout the day. It does not target a specific niche and makes daily smartwatch use more comfortable and intuitive. Students, working professionals, and general users who want something dependable from morning to night will find the Legacy Nova fits that role without overcomplicating things.BUY NOWFire-Boltt Axiom: For Users Who Take Fitness SeriouslyThe Fire-Boltt Axiom is built around health and activity tracking. Heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and workout data are its core strengths. The AMOLED display serves a practical purpose here. During outdoor workouts, readability matters, and the Axiom ensures users can comfortably view the screen. Bluetooth calling and smart notifications are included, but fitness remains the primary focus. Active users who want a watch that keeps up with their training routine will find the Axiom built precisely for that purpose.BUY NOWAlso Read: Weekend Smartwatch Sale on Flipkart: Best Samsung, Noise and Fire-Boltt Deals You Can Grab Right NowChoosing the Right ModelThe Fire-Boltt Visionary suits buyers who want versatility. The Legacy appeals to those who prioritise appearance. The Quantum fits professional environments. The Legacy Nova serves general daily use. The Axiom belongs on the wrist of anyone committed to fitness. Each model has a clear identity, and matching that identity to your lifestyle is the only decision that matters.Which Fire-Boltt AMOLED Watch Should You Buy? Quick Decision GuideAMOLED technology has made smartwatches genuinely better to use every day. Fire-Boltt has made that technology accessible. In 2026, the question is not whether to buy an AMOLED smartwatch. It is simply which one fits your life best.Also Read: Walmart Smart Watch Offers: Fitness & Calling Watches on Sale This WeekendFinal ThoughtsThe Visionary holds up as the strongest all-around pick in this lineup once display quality, calling, and daily usability are weighed together. Buyers chasing a premium look may prefer the Legacy, while the Quantum suits anyone who wants a smartwatch that disappears into a formal outfit. Legacy Nova covers everyday needs without much compromise, and Axiom stands out the moment fitness tracking becomes the priority. Across all five, the AMOLED panel is the upgrade that changes the experience the most, regardless of which model ends up on the wrist.You May Also Like:Flipkart Fitness Band Offers 2026: Best Smart Fitness Trackers at Low PricesTop 10 Fitness Trackers Without Subscription FeesBest Affordable Fitness Tracker Brands in India 2026Frequently Asked Questions1. Why is an AMOLED display better than an LCD on a smartwatch?AMOLED displays offer deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors than LCD screens. They also improve outdoor visibility and give watch faces a more premium appearance.2. Which Fire-Boltt AMOLED smartwatch is best for everyday use?The Fire-Boltt Visionary is one of the strongest all-round options for everyday use because it combines an AMOLED display, Bluetooth calling, health tracking, and smart notifications in a balanced package.3. Are Fire-Boltt AMOLED smartwatches good for fitness tracking?Yes. Most Fire-Boltt AMOLED smartwatches include fitness and health features such as activity tracking, heart-rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and multiple sports modes, making them suitable for everyday fitness monitoring.4. Do Fire-Boltt AMOLED watches support Bluetooth calling?Many Fire-Boltt AMOLED models support Bluetooth calling, allowing users to make and receive calls directly from the watch when connected to a smartphone.5. Which Fire-Boltt AMOLED smartwatch is best for professional use?The Fire-Boltt Quantum is a strong choice for professional settings because its traditional watch-inspired design blends more naturally with business and formal wear while still offering smartwatch functionality.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

ChatGPT – All-in-One AI Assistant: ChatGPT helps users write, code, research, analyze documents, generate images, and automate workflows, making it the most versatile AI platform today.Google Gemini – AI Across Google Apps: Gemini integrates with Gmail, Docs, Search, and Android, enabling seamless AI-powered writing, research, coding, planning, and multimodal content understanding across devices.Claude – Enterprise AI for Long Documents: Claude excels at analyzing lengthy documents, summarizing reports, answering complex questions, and supporting enterprise workflows with strong contextual reasoning and safety.Perplexity AI – Search with Trusted Sources: Perplexity AI combines conversational search with web citations, helping users quickly discover accurate information, compare sources, and conduct efficient online research.Microsoft Copilot – Workplace Productivity Booster: Microsoft Copilot enhances productivity by drafting emails, summarizing meetings, creating presentations, analyzing spreadsheets, and automating repetitive tasks across Microsoft 365.Runway – AI Video Creation Platform: Runway enables creators to generate videos, edit footage, remove backgrounds, create visual effects, and produce professional-quality content using advanced generative AI.Midjourney – High-Quality AI Image Generator: Midjourney creates stunning, artistic images from text prompts, helping designers, marketers, and artists rapidly visualize creative ideas and marketing campaigns.Cursor – AI-Powered Coding Companion: Cursor accelerates software development by generating code, explaining functions, fixing bugs, and assisting developers with intelligent programming suggestions inside the editor.NotebookLM – AI Research and Knowledge Assistant: NotebookLM analyzes uploaded documents, PDFs, and notes to deliver contextual answers, summaries, and insights grounded in users' own trusted source material.Read more StoriesJoin our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Bitcoin’s latest decline has renewed concerns over whether the market is entering a longer bear phase. The asset has fallen for two straight quarters, while Strategy’s unrealized loss and pressure on its preferred shares have added another source of risk.Bitcoin fell about 22% in the first quarter and 12.2% in the second quarter. A third negative quarter would mark its first run of three straight quarterly losses since 2022, when Bitcoin ended the year more than 65% lower.Bitcoin Faces a Critical Third QuarterBitcoin recently fell below $59,000 as traders reduced exposure to risky assets. The decline has raised doubts about whether the current move is a normal pullback or part of a wider downtrend.“Is it still too early to call the current risk-off phase anything apart from a full-blown bear market?” market observers asked as quarterly losses deepened. The comparison with 2022 has gained attention since Bitcoin has not recorded three bearish quarters in a row since that cycle.The third quarter may now become a key test. Another quarterly loss would place Bitcoin in a pattern last seen in its worst annual decline. Nevertheless, the current drop remains smaller than the 2022 collapse. The final result will depend on price movements through September.Selling pressure has also spread to companies linked to Bitcoin. Strategy’s common shares recently dropped below $85.50 and closed near $82 on Friday, their lowest level since February 2024.Strategy’s Funding Model Comes Under PressureStrategy holds one of the largest corporate Bitcoin reserves, but falling prices have left the company with about $14 billion in unrealized losses. Its STRC preferred shares also carry an 11.5% annual dividend, equal to roughly $1.2 billion in yearly payments.STRC was designed to trade near $100 and provide Strategy with funds for more Bitcoin purchases. Yet the shares fell as much as 26% below that level and reached a record low. The drop has raised doubts about the company’s ability to issue more shares on favorable terms.CryptoQuant said Strategy should pause Bitcoin purchases and rebuild its cash holdings. The firm estimated that cash coverage for STRC dividends has fallen from more than seven years to about 14 months.When STRC trades below its intended value, new issuance becomes less attractive. Strategy has therefore paused that part of its funding process. Analyst Mark Palmer said the model has become “less efficient” rather than broken. He also rejected comparisons with failed crypto projects.Ripple CEO Questions Strategy’s Bitcoin ApproachRipple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said he remains bullish on Bitcoin but criticized Strategy’s preferred-share model. In a Friday interview, he described the structure as “financial engineering” that had distracted the market from long-term utility.“Financial engineering does not drive long-term value,” Garlinghouse said. He added that a digital asset’s value should come from practical use rather than complex funding structures.Garlinghouse called STRC’s fall below its $100 target a “damning indictment” of Strategy’s approach. His comments focused on the company’s financing method rather than Bitcoin itself.Meanwhile, Arkham Intelligence said the situation does not resemble the Terra-LUNA collapse. Still, falling Strategy shares, weak STRC demand and reduced funding capacity have raised doubts about future Bitcoin purchases.Bitcoin now enters the third quarter under pressure from lower prices and tighter funding conditions. A third straight quarterly loss would create a pattern not seen since the 2022 bear market.Also Read: XRP Price Target: Can Real-World Use Push It to $27? 

Dogecoin and Hyperliquid’s HYPE recorded the steepest weekly losses among major cryptocurrencies as investors directed more funds toward the stock market. Both tokens fell by nearly 10%, while Bitcoin, Ether and XRP also closed the week lower.The cryptocurrency market faced pressure from spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund outflows, a strong US dollar and expectations that interest rates could stay high. Meanwhile, broader US stock indexes gained support from a rotation into companies outside the semiconductor sector.Dogecoin and HYPE Fall Nearly 10% Over Seven DaysDogecoin dropped 9.6% over the seven-day period to trade near $0.076. Hyperliquid’s HYPE fell 9.9%, making it the weakest performer among the major digital assets tracked during the week. Ether declined 8.4% to about $1,581, while XRP lost 7.8% and traded near $1.06.Solana and Tron showed more stable price action. Solana traded close to $72, while Tron held near $0.32. Both tokens were roughly unchanged for the week, despite weakness across the wider cryptocurrency market. Their performance separated them from memecoins and larger altcoins that faced heavier selling.Bitcoin fell 5.3% to around $60,345 on Saturday. The cryptocurrency briefly dropped to about $58,800 on Friday before buyers pushed it back above $60,000. The recovery limited its weekly decline, although Bitcoin still traded close to its long-term 200-week moving average.Market analyst Alex Kuptsikevich said Bitcoin approached $58,000 late Thursday and early Friday before ‘aggressive buying’ returned. He said the price movement appeared similar to margin liquidations followed by buying orders placed at lower levels. Nevertheless, he raised doubts about the strength of the recovery, warning that selling pressure could return.Crypto Futures Liquidations Reach $590 MillionCrypto futures liquidations reached about $217 million over the previous 24 hours as of June 27, according to Coinglass data. The total covered positions closed by trading platforms after traders could no longer meet margin requirements.Bitcoin recorded about $71.04 million in liquidations, while Ether accounted for $50.61 million. Solana positions produced roughly $20.58 million in liquidations, and XRP traders lost about $2.43 million. The data showed that leveraged positions faced pressure as prices moved quickly across the market.Liquidations can increase short-term price swings when exchanges close several leveraged positions within a narrow period. In this case, Bitcoin’s move below $59,000 triggered further selling before pending buy orders supported the recovery toward $60,000.Kuptsikevich questioned whether that buying could hold. He said investors should prepare for “continued pressure and periodic sell-off spikes” as institutional investors may reduce crypto exposure to protect their balance sheets. His comments presented doubts about a stable recovery while market sentiment stayed weak.US Stocks Attract Funds as Crypto Misses Broader RotationWall Street showed a different pattern during the week. Investors moved away from semiconductor companies and directed funds toward a wider group of businesses linked to steady economic growth. The S&P 500 ended little changed, although most companies within the index gained.The equal-weight S&P 500 reached a record high. That version gives every company the same influence and reduces the effect of the largest technology stocks. Falling oil prices also supported market sentiment, while chip shares extended their recent decline.The movement showed that investors had not fully left risk assets. Instead, they became more selective about where they placed capital. Funds leaving chipmakers moved into other stock sectors rather than cryptocurrencies, leaving Bitcoin and major altcoins without support from the broader market rotation.Meanwhile, crypto faced separate pressures from US spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, a hawkish Federal Reserve and dollar strength. Bitcoin’s position near its 200-week moving average also kept traders focused on further downside risk as Dogecoin, HYPE, Ether and XRP ended the week with deeper losses.Also Read: Are Bitcoin & Nasdaq Headed Lower? Macro Outlook Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

A sharp decline in artificial intelligence stocks has exposed the growing role of leveraged investment products across global markets. The sell-off spread from major US technology companies to Asian chipmakers, SpaceX-linked funds and crypto-related assets.The market decline also raised questions about how investors gain exposure to popular themes. Leveraged ETFs, options and other products allow traders to increase potential returns. Yet they can also deepen losses when prices move in the opposite direction.Leveraged AI Funds Magnify the Market Sell-OffInvestors moved away from major AI stocks this week as concerns about high valuations and rising infrastructure costs grew. Alphabet shares fell about 7% in one session, erasing roughly $270 billion from the company’s market value. The NASDAQ Composite and semiconductor shares also recorded steep declines.The selling soon reached Asian markets. Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and other semiconductor companies came under pressure as investors reduced exposure to chipmakers. In South Korea, several popular funds offering two or three times the daily returns of major technology stocks lost more than 20% over the week.Leveraged ETFs use derivatives to multiply an asset’s daily price movement. Global assets held by these funds have climbed above $270 billion. The United States accounts for more than $200 billion, while Asian markets hold over $45 billion, according to compiled market data.As these funds expand, their daily rebalancing can create large buying and selling orders. Barclays estimated that recent rebalancing activity among US leveraged ETFs reached several times its long-term average. These mechanical trades can add pressure when markets move sharply.Samuel Hartzmark, a behavioral finance professor at Boston College, questioned whether some products serve retail investors. “If there’s a general desire from unsophisticated retail investors for some attribute that does not actually make them better off, this strategy too will be made available to them,” he said.SpaceX Funds Show Risks Behind Concentrated TradesMeanwhile, funds linked to SpaceX offered another example of concentrated market exposure. Leveraged SpaceX products attracted nearly $1 billion after the rocket company’s public market debut. Yet some bullish funds fell about 40% from their launch levels as the share price reversed.The products gave investors a faster way to bet on SpaceX without buying only the underlying shares. Still, the company’s limited public float and expected index inclusion created technical price pressures. These forces sometimes moved the stock independently of standard company measures.Christopher Getter, a portfolio manager at Simplify Asset Management, raised doubts about whether smaller investors fully understand those risks. “There is a significant risk that smaller investors will end up feeling the pinch when the fundamentals reassert themselves,” he said.Benchmark indexes also weakened during the broader retreat. The S&P 500 lost nearly 2%, while the NASDAQ 100 dropped more than 4%. Selling in large technology stocks placed further pressure on funds tied to AI, semiconductors and newly listed companies.Strategy Decline Spreads Pressure Across Crypto ProductsAdditionally, the decline reached crypto markets through Strategy, the company known for its large Bitcoin holdings. Strategy has become the centre of several investment products, including leveraged ETFs, common shares and preferred stock.Bullish and bearish leveraged ETFs linked to Strategy have lost more than 90% since their 2024 launches. The funds had attracted billions of dollars from traders seeking amplified exposure to the company’s price swings. Strategy’s preferred shares also fell below their original values.The simultaneous decline showed how several products can track the same market idea. Investors used different structures, but each relied heavily on Bitcoin demand and Strategy’s ability to raise capital.Ellen Hazen of F.L. Putnam Investment Management questioned the need for some products. “You get products like these that are marketed to meet perceived demand,” she said. “There are many financial products out there that do not have a reason to exist, but they are sold.”The products did not start the market decline. Still, their structure increased trading activity as AI stocks, SpaceX shares and crypto assets fell. James St. Aubin of Ocean Park Asset Management also expressed doubt about the growing demand. “Anyone using leverage should understand they are playing with fire,” he said.Also Read: Elon Musk Hits $1.32T Peak, Then Loses $363B in Days as SpaceX Stock Drops 31%Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Cisco plans to eliminate 471 positions across three California offices as part of a wider restructuring announced in May. The job cuts will affect employees in San José, Milpitas and San Francisco, according to notices filed with the California Employment Development Department.The networking and cybersecurity company previously said it would cut fewer than 4,000 jobs worldwide, representing less than 5% of its workforce. The latest filings provide more detail about the California positions included in that plan.Cisco Layoffs Spread Across Three Bay Area OfficesCisco will eliminate 236 positions in San José, 154 in Milpitas and 81 in San Francisco. Employees received notices on May 14, while the terminations are scheduled to begin on July 13. Some affected workers may leave within the 13 days following that date.The company described the reductions as permanent in its Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification letters. California law requires certain employers to provide workers and state officials with at least 60 days’ notice before a large layoff or facility closure.Cisco said it had no additional information beyond the restructuring details released in May. The company has described the plan as an effort to lower costs in some business areas while directing more resources toward selected investments.Chief Executive Chuck Robbins told employees that Cisco expects to benefit from the growth of artificial intelligence. He also said reaching that goal requires “making hard decisions — about where we invest, how we’re organized, and how our cost structure reflects the opportunity in front of us.”Software Engineering Employees Account for Many CutsThe layoffs cover several departments, including software development, product management, design and business operations. Software engineers form the largest single group listed in the California notices, with 56 positions scheduled for elimination.That total includes 34 software engineering jobs in Milpitas, 19 in San José and three in San Francisco. Cisco will also cut 39 software engineering technical leader positions across the three offices. Milpitas accounts for 27 of those roles.Meanwhile, other affected positions include 17 engineering product managers, 15 software engineering leaders and 12 directors of software engineering. Cisco also listed 12 engineering program managers, nine directors of product management and eight business operations managers.The notices include seven site reliability engineers, seven program managers and seven software quality assurance engineers. The range of job titles shows that the restructuring reaches both technical teams and management positions.A Cisco business partner executive described the reductions as part of a familiar cost-cutting pattern. The executive said sources viewed the move as “the regular Cisco cadence” before certain quarterly earnings announcements. Cisco did not confirm that assessment.AI Investment Grows as Technology Job Cuts RiseCisco is carrying out the layoffs while reporting stronger financial results. The company recorded quarterly revenue of $15.8 billion, its highest level for a fiscal third quarter. Net income rose 35% from the previous year to $3.4 billion.The company markets its networking products as critical infrastructure for the AI sector. Demand for data centers and AI computing systems has supported spending on networking equipment, cybersecurity products and related services.Nevertheless, technology companies have also reduced staff while increasing AI investment. Meta, Snap, Block, Oracle and Amazon are among the companies that have announced job cuts this year. Some executives have linked workforce changes to automation and the wider use of AI tools.US technology companies announced 123,653 job cuts between January and May, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. This figure increased 66% from the same period in 2025. The firm said companies cited AI more often than any other reason, although it questioned whether AI alone explains the wider rise in layoffs.Cisco reported about 86,200 employees as of July 2025. Its planned global reduction of fewer than 4,000 positions would affect less than 5% of that workforce.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

SpaceX will enter the NASDAQ 100 before the market opens on July 7, 2026, less than one month after its June 12 public debut. NASDAQ confirmed the addition on Friday, placing the rocket, satellite and artificial intelligence company among the exchange’s largest non-financial businesses.The move could lead to heavy buying from funds that track the index. JP Morgan estimates that NASDAQ 100 inclusion may bring about $4.3 billion into SpaceX shares. Yet the fast entry has also renewed questions about the company’s valuation, limited trading history and recent losses.NASDAQ 100 Funds Prepare to Buy SpaceX SharesIndex funds must adjust their holdings when NASDAQ adds a new company. Products that fully copy the NASDAQ 100 will need to buy SpaceX shares in line with its assigned index weight. Major funds linked to the benchmark include Invesco QQQ and QQQM, which give investors broad exposure to large NASDAQ-listed companies.The NASDAQ 100 measures the performance of 100 large non-financial companies listed on NASDAQ. Its membership reaches retirement accounts, brokerage portfolios and other savings products through index funds. Changes to the benchmark can therefore produce concentrated trading as managers align their holdings with the updated company list globally.NASDAQ said more than 200 investment products track the index, with over $800 billion in assets under management worldwide. As a result, the July 7 change may create a large block of price-insensitive demand. Active funds that use the NASDAQ 100 as a benchmark may also change their positions, although their purchases are not automatic.Faster Index Rules Open the Door After SpaceX IPOSpaceX began trading under the SPCX ticker on June 12 after pricing its initial public offering at $135 per share. NASDAQ later said the company would join the NASDAQ 100 before trading starts on July 7. The short gap reflects revised entry rules designed for large companies that reach public markets with high valuations.NASDAQ, FTSE Russell and MSCI have eased some conditions linked to profitability, public float and the time a stock must trade after an IPO. These changes allow newly listed firms to enter major benchmarks sooner. SpaceX reported a $4.9 billion net loss for 2025, while revenue rose as the company expanded Starlink, launch services and AI operations.Valuation Doubts Remain Despite Expected InflowsThe expected fund buying does not settle concerns about the share price. Morningstar chief equity market strategist Michael Field said the quick addition showed strong demand. He also stated, “We think the stock is overvalued.” His comment reflects a cautious view as SpaceX trades with a short public record and large spending needs.Meanwhile, S&P Global has kept stricter rules for entry into the S&P 500. A company must trade publicly for at least 12 months, meet profitability tests and satisfy free-float conditions before the index committee can consider it. Therefore, SpaceX cannot receive S&P 500 consideration until at least June 2027.The different approaches create separate timelines for index-linked buying. NASDAQ 100 funds will rebalance for the July addition, while S&P 500 trackers will not buy SpaceX under current rules. OpenAI and Anthropic may face similar index questions if they complete planned public listings in 2026 or 2027 at valuations above $1 trillion.Also Read: SpaceX IPO Hype Builds as FTSE Russell Opens Faster Index Path for Large Market DebutsJoin our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

OverviewHybrid cloud helps banks modernize operations without compromising regulatory compliance requirements.AI adoption is accelerating cloud investments across global financial institutions today.Control, resilience, and flexibility are driving long-term banking technology strategies globally.The banking industry is undergoing one of its most significant technology transitions in decades. Faced with rising customer expectations, increasing regulatory scrutiny, cybersecurity threats, and pressure from fintech challengers, banks are rethinking how they manage data and digital services. At the center of this transformation is hybrid cloud—a model that combines private infrastructure with public cloud services.While banks typically consider hybrid cloud an innovation and resilience strategy, the real issue is whether the financial sector is implementing hybrid cloud to survive in a fast-changing environment or to gain better control over its processes.Pressure to ModernizeHistorical banking architecture has been designed for stability and not agility. Most financial organizations continue to rely on legacy architectures that are expensive to operate and hard to scale. Providing services to customers through digital banking requires upgrading the existing legacy systems.Furthermore, increased pressure from fintech companies that provide fast service and rely on relatively cheaper infrastructure has forced most banks to modernize their operations to remain competitive in the new digital banking environment.Hybrid cloud offers a good middle ground for banks. The traditional method of migrating all activities to a public cloud may not be necessary. Banks should be able to maintain some of their important activities in a private environment and innovate on cloud platforms.Why Public Cloud Alone is Not EnoughWhile most businesses can operate without such constraints, the banking industry is subject to stringent rules governing data protection, privacy, and resilience.The move towards public cloud poses serious issues, including data sovereignty concerns, dependence on third-party vendors, and operational risk. Many regulatory bodies in different countries still mandate that financial institutions be able to oversee their systems.In this regard, hybrid cloud provides banks with an opportunity to run mission-critical applications and sensitive data on the controlled side while utilizing the public cloud for data analysis, customer engagement tools, artificial intelligence, and software development.Also Read: Top-Rated Banking Apps with the Best User ExperienceControl Has Become a Strategic AssetControl becomes the crux of the hybrid cloud argument. Financial institutions have recognized the importance of controlling data, application deployment, and security policies to gain an edge. Financial companies should have the opportunity to change their applications, be free from vendor lock-in, and adapt their approaches in response to regulations.A hybrid cloud approach allows for that. Rather than entrusting their applications to a single provider, banks will be able to distribute them across their private infrastructure and cloud solutions. Cloud strategy is no longer an IT decision, but a business one.AI Factor Speeds up AdoptionThe increasing popularity of AI technology obliges banks to invest more in cloud infrastructure, as they need it to detect fraud, assess risk, deliver customer services, ensure compliance, and provide financial counseling.A lot of computing power and massive amounts of data are needed for that. The public cloud will allow scaling of necessary capabilities, while keeping financial information protected in the private cloud.Hybrid cloud offers a solution to these two needs at once. The need to find such a balance will only grow as banks start using AI more widely.Benefits and Challenges of Hybrid CloudAlso Read: How Fintech Companies Challenge Established Banking GiantsSurvival and Control are No Longer Separate GoalsThe outdated idea of a trade-off between survival and control in banks no longer fits reality. In fact, these two things are strongly correlated. Survival in modern banking presupposes being fast, innovative, and resilient. Control is important for risk management, building up customer trust, and fulfilling regulatory requirements. The concept of hybrid cloud can address both needs.Public cloud or a purely private ecosystem would most likely not be the future of banking. Instead, the future will be associated with balanced ecosystems.For banks, hybrid cloud is not just a technical solution. This is the way to respond to a competitive environment in which innovation is necessary while maintaining control over the systems underpinning the financial sector.You May Also LikeDoes Fintech Adoption Improve Bank Lending Efficiency?What is a savings account? A beginner’s guide to managing your moneyRBI Cancels Paytm Payments Bank Licence After 2-Year Crackdown: Key Impact on Users & ServicesFAQs1. What is hybrid cloud in banking?Hybrid cloud combines private infrastructure and public cloud services, allowing banks to balance security, flexibility, compliance, and innovation.2. Why are banks adopting hybrid cloud?Banks use hybrid cloud to modernize operations, improve scalability, enhance resilience, support AI initiatives, and meet regulations.3. How does hybrid cloud improve security?It enables sensitive financial data to remain protected within private environments while leveraging cloud resources securely elsewhere.4. What challenges do banks face with hybrid cloud?Key challenges include integration complexity, evolving regulations, cybersecurity management, vendor coordination, and skilled talent shortages.5. How does AI influence hybrid cloud adoption?AI workloads require scalable computing power, making hybrid cloud ideal for balancing performance, security, and compliance needs.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Massive Open World: GTA 6's version of Vice City looks bigger than ever. Leaks suggest more locations, activities, and areas to explore.Lucia Takes the Spotlight: Lucia becomes GTA's first female lead in a main game. Fans are excited about her story and characterBonnie and Clyde-Inspired Story: The game follows Lucia and her partner in crime. Their relationship appears central to the entire narrative.Stunning Visual Upgrades: Improved lighting, weather effects, and character details make GTA 6 look far more realistic than previous entries.Smarter NPC Behavior: NPCs reportedly react more naturally to events. This could make the world feel alive and unpredictable.Dynamic Weather System: Heavy storms, flooding, and changing weather conditions may affect gameplay, creating fresh experiences across different sessions.Expanded Vehicle Features: Fans expect improved driving mechanics, more vehicle customization options, and realistic traffic behavior throughout the map.Huge Social Media Parodies: Leaked clips show social media-inspired content everywhere. These features could deliver Rockstar's trademark humor and satire.Long-Term Online Plans: Many believe GTA 6 Online will receive years of updates, events, and content expansions after launch.Read More StoriesJoin our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:Android TV and Google TV may share the same foundation, but they deliver different user experiences.While Android TV focuses on app-based navigation, Google TV prioritizes personalized content discovery and smarter recommendations.This comparison explores their interface, app ecosystem, smart home features, and overall usability to help buyers choose the right smart TV platform. A smart TV is not just a screen for watching movies and sports. It has become the entertainment hub of the modern home, handling everything from streaming and gaming to video calls and smart home controls. As television brands increasingly offer models powered by either Android TV or Google TV, buyers are often left wondering which platform offers the better experience.Understanding The Key Differences Before You Buy While both systems come from Google and share several similarities, there are notable differences that can influence your buying decision:Same Foundation, Different ExperienceAt their core, Android TV and Google TV are built on the same operating system. Both provide access to the Google Play Store, support Google Assistant voice commands, and allow users to cast content from smartphones through Chromecast. The difference lies in how content is presented. Android TV is built around apps.Users open individual streaming services such as Netflix, Prime Video, or YouTube to browse content. Google TV, on the other hand, puts content front and centre. Instead of highlighting apps, it curates movies, shows and recommendations from multiple streaming platforms on a single home screen, reducing the need to jump between services.Also Read: Samsung AI Soccer Mode Lands in India With Free TVs Worth Rs. 2.14LA More Modern Home ScreenOne of the greatest strengths of Google TV is the more streamlined and personalized interface that it offers to users. As time passes by, Google TV begins to recognize viewing patterns and suggests programming based on the viewer's interests.Another great strength of the technology is that it supports separate user profiles in households with many viewers. Each family member can have his or her own recommendations and watchlist. Android TV makes recommendations, but they are not as prominent as those from Google TV.Also Read: Top 10 Smart Home Devices to Upgrade Your Living Space in 2026App Support Remains IdenticalWhen it comes to app availability, there is little difference between the two platforms. Both support streaming applications, gaming applications, productivity software, and music applications from the Google Play Store. Users can easily access Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Spotify, Jio Hotstar, or YouTube on both platforms.Same Features for Connected HomesWith the proliferation of smart homes, televisions are turning out to be control centers for connected devices. Google TV has a minor advantage in this segment.Google TV gives better integration with Google’s smart home services, enabling users to easily control compatible cameras, lights, speakers, and other such devices through their television. Another important feature that is exclusive to Google TV is children's profiles and parental controls.Which One Should You Buy?Android TV stands out as an excellent choice for consumers looking for a simple and similar experience. The TV is ideal for those who get their content from a few apps that they like without having any need for recommendations.Google TV is ideal for those who have subscriptions to many streaming services and would like some assistance in finding new content.Final VerdictThe gap between Android TV and Google TV is not about app support or performance. It is about convenience. Android TV continues to offer a dependable smart TV experience, but Google TV feels more in tune with the way people watch content today. For most buyers shopping for a new television, Google TV's richer interface and smarter recommendations make it the platform that is easier to live with in the long run. You May Also Like:Space-Saving Google TVs: Best Picks for Studio ApartmentsAmazon Rolls Out Google TV-Inspired Fire TV Update in the US with Faster PerformanceBest Google TVs to Watch Live Sports in 202FAQsQ1. What is the main difference between Android TV and Google TV?Android TV focuses on apps and lets users browse content within individual streaming services, while Google TV emphasizes content discovery by bringing recommendations from multiple platforms onto a single home screen.Q2. Do Android TV and Google TV support the same apps?Yes, both platforms offer access to the Google Play Store and support popular apps like Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, Prime Video, Spotify, and many other streaming and entertainment services.Q3. Is Google TV better for families?Google TV is often better for families because it supports separate user profiles, personalized recommendations, dedicated kids' profiles, and enhanced parental controls for a more customized viewing experience.Q4. Can both the platforms work with smart home devices?Yes, Android TV and Google TV support Google Assistant and connected smart devices, but Google TV offers deeper smart home integration and easier control of compatible gadgets directly.Q5. Which platform should I choose for a new TV?If you prefer a simple app-based interface, Android TV is sufficient. If you want personalized recommendations, multiple profiles, and easier content discovery, Google TV is the better choice.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Overview:Electric shavers under Rs. 5,000 now offer waterproof designs, wet-and-dry shaving, self-sharpening blades, and reliable battery life for everyday grooming.Compare the top five electric shavers in India for 2026 based on blade technology, runtime, comfort, and overall value.Find the right electric shaver for your grooming needs with a detailed comparison of trusted models from leading brands.An electric shaver is a practical investment for anyone who wants a quick, clean shave without using disposable razors every few days. The latest models under Rs. 5,000 now include features found only in expensive brands like wet/dry capability, waterproof construction, automatic blade sharpeners, and fast charging.Affordable Electric Shavers Worth Buying Today: Top 5If you're planning to buy one, these five models stand out for their performance, comfort, and reliability.Philips S3144/03Philips S3144/03 features 27 self-sharpening ComfortCut blades with 5D Pivot & Flex heads for better contour tracking. It supports wet and dry shaving, includes SkinProtect technology, a pop-up trimmer, a waterproof IPX7 body, a 5-minute quick charge, and a 60-minute cordless runtime.Buy Now!Braun Series 3 310sBraun Series 3 310s is equipped with a triple-action foil shaving system featuring three pressure-sensitive shaving elements. It offers wet and dry use, a fully waterproof design, a NiMH rechargeable battery, 45-minute runtime, a five-minute quick charge, and ergonomic cordless operation for everyday shaving. Buy Now!Wahl Launch Professional ShaverWahl Launch Professional Shaver comes with triple-floating foil blades powered by a 6,500 RPM motor for fast shaving. It supports corded and cordless operation, offers 120-minute runtime, an LED battery indicator, a washable shaving head, 0.04 mm cutting length, and a safety lock. Buy Now!Philips X3063/03Philips X3063/03 includes 27 self-sharpening blades with 3D floating heads for consistent skin contact. It features SkinProtect technology, wet and dry operation, a pop-up trimmer, waterproof construction, cordless use, and a one-touch open head for simple cleaning. Buy Now!Also Read: Best Gadgets for Men in 2025: Smart, Stylish, and Practical PicksHavells RS7130 Dual Track ShaverHavells RS7130 uses a dual-track rotary shaving system with three rotary heads for wider coverage. It features cordless rechargeable operation, a pop-up trimmer, an ergonomic grip, a washable shaving head, an LED charging indicator, and a battery suitable for multiple shaving sessions. Buy Now!Also Read: Top 10 Must-Have Gadgets for Men in 2026: The Ultimate Tech Gift GuideKey Differences Between Top Electric ShaversFinal TakeawayAn efficient electric shaver need not come with an exorbitant price tag. There are quite a few electric shavers available in the market below the price of Rs. 5,000, which ensure satisfactory performance and comfort while also offering various benefits. Philips S3144/03 is the best overall choice for its balanced feature set, while Braun Series 3 310s is ideal for those who prefer a foil shaver. Wahl, Philips X3063/03, and Havells RS7130 complete the list with strong performance and good value, making them worthy options for different grooming needs.You May Also Like: Top Cool Gadgets for MenTop 10 Luxury Watch Brands for Men: Best Premium Timepieces in 2026Best Fitness Apps for Men to Track Workouts, Diet, and ProgressFAQsQ1. Which is the best electric shaver under Rs. 5,000 in India?Philips S3144/03 is one of the best electric shavers under Rs. 5,000. It offers wet-and-dry shaving, self-sharpening blades, a waterproof body, and reliable performance for everyday grooming.Q2. Are electric shavers better than manual razors?Electric shavers are faster, more convenient, and reduce the risk of cuts and razor burns. Manual razors usually provide a closer shave but require more time and regular blade replacements.Q3. Can electric shavers be used for wet shaving?Yes. Models like Philips S3144/03, Braun Series 3 310s, and Philips X3063/03 support wet-and-dry shaving, allowing use with water, shaving foam, or gel.Q4. How long does the battery last on an electric shaver?Battery life depends on the model. Most electric shavers under Rs. 5,000 offer between 40 and 120 minutes of cordless use after a full charge.Q5. Which electric shaver is best for sensitive skin?Braun Series 3 310s is a good option for sensitive skin. Its pressure-sensitive shaving elements help reduce irritation while providing a close and comfortable shave.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has urged senior executives to explore partnerships with Polymarket and Kalshi while the company tests its own prediction-market app, Arena. The New York Times reported the discussions, while The Block cited the report on Friday. The partnership effort adds another option to Meta’s earlier plan to build a standalone product. The talks remain exploratory, and Meta has not announced any agreement.Meta Weighs Partnerships Alongside its Own PlatformThree days before the partnership report, the Times said Zuckerberg had directed a small team to develop Arena. The app would operate separately from Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.Insiders described Arena as experimental, yet they also called it a top company priority. Meta is therefore assessing an internal platform and possible distribution arrangements with established operators.Will Meta pursue an independent platform, a distribution partnership, or both? The company reported 3.56 billion daily users across its Family of Apps during the first quarter of 2026.Polymarket and Kalshi Extend Their Market ReachMeta would not become the first major social platform to connect with a prediction-market operator. X selected Polymarket as its official prediction-market partner in June 2025. That arrangement placed live market probabilities and Grok-powered annotations beside posts. A similar Meta deal could introduce prediction markets across its large social-media network.Meanwhile, Polymarket and Kalshi have expanded rapidly during the past year. Their combined event-contract trading volume crossed $60 billion in 2026.Institutional market makers, including Wintermute, have also provided liquidity. Kalshi raised $1 billion at a $22 billion valuation in May and reportedly seeks a $40 billion valuation.Arena Revives Meta’s Earlier Prediction-Market EffortMeta previously ran Forecast from 2020 until 2022. The points-based platform allowed users to make crowdsourced predictions, but Meta closed it following low usage. NPR reported that internal documents also linked the shutdown to the cost of manually selecting questions. Arena represents Meta’s second known consumer prediction product.A points model would separate Arena from the real-money services offered by Polymarket and Kalshi. Even without cash trading, Arena could support engagement, advertising, and user-interest data. The product would still face questions involving false information, manipulation, sensitive event categories, and protections for younger users. Meta has not explained how Arena could generate revenue.Also Read: Google Employee Accused of Using Confidential Search Data for Polymarket ProfitsPrediction markets let participants trade contracts tied to future events. Prices often reflect market-implied probabilities across politics, monetary policy, sports, entertainment, and financial developments. Kalshi has operated as a Commodity Futures Trading Commission-designated contract market since 2020. Polymarket says its United States business also uses a CFTC-regulated designated contract market.Meta’s renewed interest follows a quarterly decline in daily users across its Family of Apps during the first quarter. Meta blamed internet disruptions in Iran and WhatsApp restrictions in Russia. Polymarket and Kalshi have not publicly addressed Meta’s reported interest. Meta has also issued no partnership announcement, while Arena remains an internal experiment.ConclusionMeta is testing Arena while exploring possible partnerships with Polymarket and Kalshi, giving the company both internal and external routes into prediction markets. No agreement or launch has been confirmed. Market participants should watch for official details on Arena’s structure, distribution, and regulatory approach.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp