Warning Savings protection Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives in France without being authorized to do so

1.3 Wed 30/09/2020 - 12:00 Reference texts Articles 318-44, 321-77, 321-81 and 323-39 of the General Regulation Articles 47, 48 and 92 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 231/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2012 …

The xrp price prediction debate continues while the ground beneath it shifts. Stablecoin issuers and fintech firms are building dedicated payment blockchains to control settlement infrastructure according to TronWeekly.  Tether launched Plasma for cross border USDT transactions. Circle unveiled the Arc testnet for enterprise stablecoin finance. Stripe acquired stablecoin firms and launched its own chain called Tempo according to BloomingBit.  Companies want to own the rails their money moves on instead of depending on Ethereum. That shift matters for the xrp price outlook because Ripple's thesis depends on being the cross border bridge.  If stablecoin issuers build their own bridges, the xrp price loses a critical assumption. Meanwhile, investors are looking at presale entries where gains arrive before the settlement war is decided. Stablecoin Settlement War Intensifies as Tether, Circle, and Stripe Build Dedicated Payment Chains Tether's Plasma went live in September 2025 after raising $24 million, processing USDT transfers with zero gas costs according to TronWeekly.  Circle's Arc achieves finality under one second with over 100 institutions including BlackRock, Visa, and Coinbase testing it according to BloomingBit.  Companies want to build payment infrastructure themselves rather than depend on external networks. The xrp price prediction must now account for stablecoin issuers that do not need Ripple's bridge at all. XRP Price Prediction 2026 and the Presale That Does Not Need the Settlement War to Deliver Returns Pepeto: The Exchange Presale Where the Returns Come Before the War Is Decided The stablecoin settlement race is intensifying, but the investors making the biggest moves this cycle are not betting on which chain wins that war. They are entering the presale where the returns come from a single confirmed listing event, not from years of protocol competition. Alongside every xrp price prediction, traders are exploring Pepeto because the math from presale to listing does not require Ripple to win or stablecoins to pick a chain. Pepeto combines a fee free exchange platform with a capital protection layer being constructed on the Ethereum blockchain. The exchange is designed to support better trading outcomes by removing the costs and contract risks that destroy most portfolios during volatile markets like this one. A contract screening tool is built to run before your capital gets anywhere near a new token, catching red flags and honeypot traps before a single dollar is committed. A multi chain bridge is designed to move tokens across networks so what you send is exactly what arrives, without hidden charges eating into every transfer. But the gains potential is what drives the capital. The conviction is clear: past the $8 million mark while most coins sit flat, staking at 195% APY giving holders expanding positions, and presale stages filling faster with every round. The original Pepe cofounder constructed a $11 billion token on 420 trillion supply with zero products.  Matching that from $0.000000186 is 150x, and Pepeto has a full exchange being built that the original never attempted. Even if the xrp price delivers $5 eventually, Pepeto's Binance listing compresses that return timeline into days instead of years, and the wallets that enter before that moment carry the positions everyone else spends this cycle wishing they had. XRP Price Prediction: Targets, Levels, and Why the Returns Have a Ceiling XRP trades at $1.39, down 60% from its July 2025 all time high of $3.65 according to CoinMarketCap. The CLARITY Act passed the House but remains stalled in the Senate with 56% odds of passing. Without it, Standard Chartered revised its xrp price prediction to $2.80.  With it, analysts see $5 to $10. Spot XRP ETFs pulled in $1.24 billion since November 2025. Even the bull case at $5 is 3.5x from here. The stablecoin war adds new risk to the xrp price targets. The presale to listing math does not carry that risk. The XRP Price Prediction Carries New Risk From the Stablecoin War, but the Presale Window Carries None The whales accumulating Pepeto are sending the strongest signal in this presale because they see what the listing delivers. The exchange infrastructure fixes the one thing every meme coin lacked: a reason for demand to keep growing after launch instead of fading.  But the main wealth driver is viral energy. Shiba Inu delivered over 25,000% to early holders on virality alone with zero products. Pepeto carries stronger virality into a higher volume market, and the Binance listing drawing closer is the event that pushes the price to its peak.  The presale entry right now is the same window that created every crypto millionaire story people still reference today. The Pepeto official website is where that window remains open. Enter the presale that does not need the xrp price prediction to deliver  Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale FAQs How does the stablecoin settlement war affect the xrp price? Tether, Circle, and Stripe building their own payment chains means Ripple's cross border bridge faces new competition. The xrp price must now account for a world where stablecoin issuers do not need XRP. What is the xrp price prediction for 2026? Analysts target $2.80 to $10 depending on the CLARITY Act. Even at $5 that is 3.5x. Pepeto at ground floor entry targets 150x to the level Pepe reached with zero products. Why are traders choosing Pepeto over the xrp price prediction? XRP targets 3.5x at best. Pepeto targets 150x from a single listing event. Visit the Pepeto official website before the presale window closes permanently.

OpenAI is expanding advertising in ChatGPT for users on its lower-cost plans in the United States. The company said ads are being rolled out for logged-in adult users on the Free and Go tiers, while paid plans such as Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Education will remain without ads. At the same time, OpenAI said the change is part of a phased test as it adds another source of revenue while keeping access open on lower-priced options.OpenAI Broadens Ads on Free and Go PlansOpenAI said it began testing ads in ChatGPT in the United States on February 9, 2026. The company limited the early rollout to logged-in adult users on the Free and Go plans. It also said the expansion would continue gradually as it reviews feedback and product performance.The company later said it plans to widen the ad program across those lower-cost tiers in the US. As a result, more users on Free and Go are expected to see sponsored placements inside ChatGPT. However, OpenAI kept its premium and business subscriptions outside the test.OpenAI also linked the ad rollout to broader access. According to the company, ads are intended to help support free and affordable use of ChatGPT. Meanwhile, users who prefer an ad-free experience can stay on higher-tier plans that are not part of the program.OpenAI Outlines How Ads Will Appear in ChatGPTOpenAI said ads in ChatGPT will be “clearly labeled as sponsored” and kept separate from the main response. In addition, the company said the first format places ads at the bottom of answers when a sponsored product or service matches the topic of the conversation.The company also said ads will not influence ChatGPT’s answers. OpenAI stated that conversations remain private from advertisers, and it said advertisers receive performance information such as views and clicks rather than personal chat content. Furthermore, users can dismiss ads and share feedback on what they see.OpenAI added limits around eligibility and placement during the test. Ads will not appear on accounts where the company is told, or predicts, the user is under 18. It also said ads will not be shown next to sensitive or regulated topics during the initial phase.Also Read: GPT-4o and GPT-4.1 No Longer Available on ChatGPT: OpenAI Explains WhyCriteo Joins the Pilot as OpenAI Builds Ad ToolsCriteo said on March 2, 2026, that it had joined OpenAI’s advertising pilot in ChatGPT. The company said the integration allows brands to use Criteo’s digital advertising platform as part of the pilot. That move adds an outside ad technology partner to the program as OpenAI expands testing.At the same time, OpenAI has launched an advertiser page that presents ChatGPT as a place where businesses can connect with users during active research and decision-making. The company said it is exploring advertising as a channel for commercial discovery inside conversations.OpenAI has also described ads as part of a wider business model that includes subscriptions, API services, commerce, and compute. In that framework, advertising sits alongside other revenue lines as the company responds to growing usage across ChatGPT. As the rollout continues, the Free and Go plans remain the focus of the current US test.Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Hydration Room, a physician-founded provider of IV therapy and vitamin injection services, has opened a clinic at 1837 Union Street in Cow Hollow, San Francisco, marking the brand’s expansion into the Bay Area wellness market. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – San Francisco now has a new destination for medically supervised wellness care. Hydration Room has opened […] The post Hydration Room Opens Cow Hollow Clinic, Expanding Access to IV Wellness in San Francisco appeared first on TechBullion.

Nothing seemed amiss as NASA's experimental X-59 supersonic jet touched down after its second test in the air, smoothly coasting onto the runway. But the sleek, needle-nosed airplane had completed only nine minutes in the air on Friday, March 20, before a cockpit warning light forced an early landing. That warning was separate from a caution light that occurred during an earlier takeoff attempt just before 10 a.m. P.T., said Cathy Bahm, project manager at NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center.The brief flight left from Edwards Air Force Base in California at 10:54 a.m. P.T. marked only the second time the aircraft had flown. While the team originally planned for about an hour, leaders stressed that even short flights provide new data for moving the project forward. You can watch the landing in the video below. Bob Pearce, who heads NASA's aeronautics research, said the team made the right call to cut the flight short on Friday. The agency expects to find and fix issues at this stage of an X‑plane, an aircraft the U.S. builds to test new flight technologies and ideas."Sometimes it's easy to forget that building this kind of experimental aircraft means creating something that never existed before," Pearce said during a news conference. "As far as X-planes go, it's not unusual." SEE ALSO: Mars evidence shows ancient river likely larger and faster than thought The X-59 is part of a long-term effort to change how fast commercial airplanes fly over land. Traditional supersonic aircraft create a loud boom when they break the sound barrier, which is why the U.S. government bans routine supersonic passenger flights over populated areas. NASA and its contractor, Lockheed Martin, built the X-59 to fly faster than sound while producing only a "thump," with the goal of providing regulators and the industry with the evidence needed to reconsider the restrictions.At the kind of supersonic speeds NASA wants to target for the X-59 — around 925 mph — a nonstop flight from New York to L.A. could take less than three hours. Today's commercial airlines typically cruise at about 550 mph on that route, so passengers tend to spend about 5 to 6 hours crossing the country. View this post on Instagram A post shared by NASA Aeronautics (@nasaaero) A sonic boom occurs when a plane flies faster than the speed of sound, compressing pressure waves into a single shock wave that hits the ground like a sudden explosion of air. NASA designed the X‑59 so its shape spreads those pressure changes out along the aircraft, turning that single sharp shock into a series of smaller pulses.Residents below didn't hear the X-59's thump during either of the first two test flights — and they weren't supposed to. The plane never flew fast enough either time to make it. Both flights intentionally stayed at subsonic speeds. NASA is using these early tests to shake out systems and watch how the plane handles. During Friday's test, the aircraft was supposed to fly for roughly an hour, reaching a cruising speed of 230 mph at 12,000 feet before accelerating to 260 mph at 20,000 feet. The plane never exceeded 230 mph, officials said."I certainly hoped to have more to talk about than nine minutes of flight," said Less, who flew the X-59 for the first time on this mission. "Although I had not intended to have to land quite as urgently for my first landing, the plane performed beautifully." NASA test pilot Jim 'Clue' Less sits inside the cockpit of the experimental X-59 quiet supersonic jet at NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. Credit: NASA / Jim Ross He described the aircraft as handling just like its simulators. Over hundreds of hours of test runs in the simulator, Less and other test pilots had practiced with the unconventional vision system that combines images from cameras into a high-definition display. But this was his first time flying without the traditional front window. The long nose shape that helps soften the sonic boom doesn't leave room for a standard cockpit windscreen. But in some cases, the system offers better visibility than the naked eye, he said. If a pilot is facing into the sun, for example, image processing can reduce glare and improve contrast. "It really felt comfortable," he said. "Even though I wasn't seeing out the front, I could see out the sides and match that up." More than 100 test flights are planned. NASA intends to gradually push toward higher, faster flights before testing those muffled booms over towns.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: Which Countries Shut Down the Most Nuclear Power? See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Around 250 nuclear plants have been shut down since 1957, totaling 136,823 MW of capacity. Japan, Germany, and the U.S. lead in nuclear capacity retired. China has shut down no nuclear power plants, even as many countries reconsider the energy source. Nuclear is on the brink of a golden era but, globally, 136,823 megawatts of nuclear power has been shut down across 250 plants. Electrification, the build up of domestic manufacturing, and artificial intelligence has led to increased energy demand. Politicians and AI leaders have turned to nuclear, considered limitless low-carbon energy, as a solution. However, sentiment on the energy source is mixed thanks to radioactive waste, large-scale disasters, and its association with nuclear weapons. This graphic, based on data from Global Energy Monitor, visualizes shutdown nuclear power capacity by country from 1957 to 2025 and includes the number of shuttered sites. The Countries That Have Shut Down the Most Nuclear Power The data includes capacity retired at the end of its lifespan and mothballed earlier. Dive into it below: RankCountry/AreaUnitsCapacity (MW) 1 Japan4435,284 2 Germany3627,862 3 United States4723,311 4 United Kingdom369,163 5 France156,087 6 Russia165,879 7 Taiwan65,144 8 Sweden74,268 9 Ukraine43,800 10 Lithuania22,600 11 Canada62,268 12 Belgium32,123 13 Bulgaria41,760 14 Italy41,472 15 South Korea21,290 16 Spain31,116 17 Slovakia31,023 18 India4640 19 Philippines1621 20 Armenia1408 21 Switzerland2397 22 Pakistan1100 23 Kazakhstan190 24 Netherlands160 25 Argentina129 26 Puerto Rico118 27 Panama110 Japan, where the devastating Fukushima disaster occurred, shut down the most capacity at 35,284 megawatts over 44 facilities. The country temporarily suspended most of its nuclear plants after the 2011 accident, and only some have been brought back online. Nuclear power made up 29.5% of Germany’s electricity supply at its peak, but it has since closed all of its reactors, totaling 36 units and 27,862 megawatts. The decision to do so was made in the wake of Fukushima but the last reactor went offline just last year. The U.S. comes in third place for the number of megawatts ceased, at 23,311, but has actually shut down the highest number of facilities. Nuclear power in Ukraine has garnered its fair share of attention as Russia’s invasion threatened the stability of its Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the largest nuclear plant in Europe with a capacity of 6,000 megawatts. Russia seized the plant in 2022 and remains in control. Ukraine has shut down just four plants, totaling 3,800 megawatts. Global Energy Monitor’s data doesn’t specify the names of plants, but the former Soviet Union member is home to the Chernobyl facility that melted down in 1986. The plant had a normal operating capacity of 1,000 megawatts. Notably, China has not shut down any nuclear projects. The country is pursuing an ambitious target to have 150 gigawatts (or 150,000 megawatts) of nuclear energy capacity by 2035 as it looks to diversify its energy sources. Nuclear is Being Brought Back Online Despite decades of reactor closures, nuclear power is gaining renewed attention as global electricity demand rises. Growth in AI, electrification, and manufacturing is prompting countries to reconsider nuclear as a dependable, low-carbon energy source. In some cases, previously retired facilities are even being brought back online. The Three Mile Island site in the U.S., known for the 1979 partial meltdown, is now set to help power Microsoft data centers. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about global energy systems, check out this graphic which charts where energy transition spending by country.

The shutdown at the Department of Homeland Security has caused massive pileups at airport security lines.

Six central bank decisions and a hawkish Fed defined last week. Now flash PMIs, Australian CPI, and UK inflation data arrive against an active Iran conflict backdrop.

Why Has Brazil Paused Its Crypto Tax Plans? Brazil’s incoming Finance Minister Dario Durigan has put a planned public consultation on crypto taxation on hold, according to a Reuters report citing two sources familiar with the matter. The consultation was expected to clarify how crypto transactions should be taxed after the central bank classified certain crypto flows as foreign exchange operations. Durigan, who took office after Fernando Haddad stepped down to run for governor of Sao Paulo, is prioritizing microeconomic legislation while avoiding politically sensitive fiscal measures ahead of Brazil’s October presidential election. The sources said the government does not want to spend political capital in Congress on tax changes during an election cycle. The delay leaves a key part of Brazil’s crypto framework unresolved, particularly as regulatory oversight has already expanded to cover service providers and cross-border crypto activity. Investor Takeaway Brazil’s decision to pause crypto tax discussions reflects election-year risk management, but it also extends uncertainty around how digital asset transactions will be taxed in one of the world’s most active crypto markets. What Rules Are Already in Place for Crypto in Brazil? Brazil’s central bank finalized rules in November that brought crypto service providers under existing financial regulations. Companies operating in the sector are now required to obtain authorization, aligning crypto activity more closely with traditional financial oversight. The same framework placed stablecoin transactions and the use of digital assets for international transfers under foreign exchange supervision. That classification is central to the tax question, as it links crypto flows to existing FX rules without yet defining how those flows should be taxed. Central bank chief Gabriel Galipolo said earlier this year that crypto usage in Brazil has expanded rapidly, with roughly 90% of transaction flows tied to stablecoins, according to Reuters. The postponed consultation was expected to address how those flows should be treated from a fiscal perspective. Is This Part of a Broader Fiscal Pause? The crypto consultation delay is not an isolated decision. Reuters reported that other fiscal proposals are also being deferred, including plans to remove tax exemptions on certain investment securities such as credit letters. That proposal had already struggled to gain traction in Congress and may now be pushed beyond the current electoral cycle. Durigan’s legislative agenda is expected to focus instead on areas with lower political resistance, including regulation of big tech, financial crisis management frameworks, and investment programs linked to data center infrastructure. The approach reflects a broader attempt to keep economic policy moving without triggering contentious tax debates ahead of the vote. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has framed the transition as part of a wider economic reset, asking Durigan to be the “new face of Brazil's economy,” according to the sources cited by Reuters. With polling pointing to a competitive election and the possibility of a runoff, fiscal caution appears to be guiding policy timing. Investor Takeaway Tax policy in Brazil’s crypto sector is now tied to the political calendar, meaning clarity may not arrive until after the election or even into the next presidential term. What Does This Mean for Brazil’s Crypto Market? Brazil remains one of the largest crypto markets globally, ranking fifth worldwide and first in Latin America in adoption, according to Chainalysis data cited in the report. Between July 2024 and June 2025, the country received roughly $318.8 billion in crypto value, reflecting strong retail and institutional participation. Institutional interest has also been building. Investment firms have begun backing local crypto startups, including stablecoin projects tied to the Brazilian real, indicating that capital continues to flow into the sector despite regulatory uncertainty. At the same time, service providers operating under the central bank’s November rules still face a compliance deadline of November 2026. That creates a split environment where regulatory obligations are advancing, but tax treatment remains undefined. That said, the delay introduces a period where operational rules are clearer than fiscal ones. Exchanges, payment providers, and investors can adapt to licensing and oversight requirements, but must continue to operate without a finalized tax framework for crypto-linked transactions. The outcome of the October election will likely determine how quickly that gap is addressed. Until then, Brazil’s crypto market will continue to expand under partial regulatory clarity, with tax policy remaining one of the last unresolved components.

Here is a rundown of latest headlines surrounding the crisis in the Middle East as the United States (US) and Israel’s war against Iran enters the fourth week:

A recent Spotify-ChatGPT deal is one more sign of how AI may be the best defense for a streaming music service in a me-too market for subscribers.

FinTelegram has reviewed an email chain from a player alleging delayed withdrawals, repeated stalling, blocked live-chat access, and unresolved account-closure issues involving Super Spin and sister brand Rolly Spin. The complaint identifies Belize-registered Comentive Ltd as operator and points to a Cyprus payment-agent structure disclosed on the casino side, raising wider compliance questions around offshore gambling operations, consumer harm, and payment facilitation. Key Findings A player complaint reviewed by FinTelegram alleges that Super Spin delayed a £1,500 withdrawal for an extended period despite prior successful withdrawals and completed KYC. The same source alleges that support first cited technical issues or review processes, then became non-responsive while live chat repeatedly promised resolution “asap.” The complaint identifies Comentive Ltd as the Belize operator behind Super Spin and Rolly Spin and states that Norvelic Limited in Cyprus acts as payment agent. The player names Revolut, Mercuryo, Gwaypayment, Rillpay, and “Krypotonim” as payment channels or processors allegedly connected to the casino flows. FinTelegram treats these as allegations requiring clarification. The complaint also raises potential responsible-gambling and consumer-protection concerns, alleging that Rolly Spin failed to close an account despite repeated requests. A Player Complaint That Fits a Familiar Pattern According to the emails reviewed by FinTelegram, the player says she joined Super Spin, deposited funds, passed KYC, and won just over £20,000 without using a bonus. She says the casino’s published withdrawal limits were £1,500 a day, £4,000 a week, and £12,000 a month, but that she was only able to withdraw £4,000 over several weeks and had to fight repeated delays and excuses even for those payments. She further alleges that one £1,500 withdrawal remained outstanding well beyond the stated timelines, while support first cited technical issues and later stopped responding. In later emails, she says there were multiple outstanding withdrawals and that live chat repeatedly told her the matter would be resolved “asap” before allegedly blocking her again. That pattern matters. In many offshore casino disputes, the real friction begins not when players deposit, but when they try to cash out. Super Spin, Rolly Spin, Comentive Ltd, and the Payment-Agent Structure The complaint identifies Comentive Ltd as the operator behind Super Spin and links the same company to Rolly Spin. The reviewed material describes Super Spin as operated by Comentive Ltd, a Belize company, while Norvelic Limited, registered in Nicosia, Cyprus, is described as acting as a payment agent for Comentive Ltd. That disclosure is important. Offshore casinos often rely on European payment-side structures, agents, intermediaries, or merchant-routing arrangements to maintain access to payment rails even when the gambling operation itself sits outside major regulated jurisdictions. In this case, the player complaint places a Belize operator, an offshore licensing presentation, and a Cyprus payment-agent layer into the same picture. The existence of such a structure does not in itself prove unlawful conduct by every named entity. But it clearly raises questions that deserve answers. The Payment-Rail Questions In her messages to FinTelegram, the player names Revolut, Mercuryo, Gwaypayment, and Rillpay, as payment channels or processors she believes were involved in deposits or withdrawals connected to Super Spin. She also alleges that deposits were miscoded and routed to unrelated merchants. FinTelegram treats those statements as player allegations requiring documentation and response, not as established fact. RollySpin cashier with UTRG and ChainValley (previously UTRG) for fake FIAT deposits via Skrill and Neteller In our review of RollySpin in the context of this complaint, we once again identified UTRG and its Polish successor scheme, ChainValley (https://app.chainvalley.pro), as facilitators of FAKE FIAT transactions via Skrill and Neteller via the anonymously operated payment gateway app.gwaypayment.com. Still, the central compliance question is straightforward: who is actually processing player payments, under what merchant description, and for whose economic benefit? That question becomes particularly important when a player alleges delayed withdrawals while also identifying multiple payment intermediaries and a disclosed Cyprus payment agent in the background structure. Consumer-Harm and Responsible-Gambling Concerns The material reviewed by FinTelegram also points to potential consumer-protection and responsible-gambling issues beyond the withdrawal dispute itself. The player says she also held an account with Rolly Spin and that the operator failed to close that account despite repeated requests. She further told FinTelegram that other players were allegedly being ignored when trying to close accounts, including cases involving disclosed gambling addiction. If substantiated, that would move the issue well beyond poor customer service. A casino that allegedly delays withdrawals while also failing to process closure requests is exposing itself to serious credibility and compliance questions. Review Pressure and Reputation Management Allegations The player also alleges that Super Spin attempted to influence review behavior. In one email, she claims that the casino had previously made a “deal” under which removing a negative Trustpilot review would help ensure smoother future withdrawals, and that any further negative reviews would move her withdrawals “down the priority list.” These are serious allegations and, at this stage, remain allegations. But if supported by screenshots or correspondence, such conduct would suggest not only payout friction, but active pressure on players to moderate public criticism while funds remain pending. That combination is precisely why the case deserves closer scrutiny. Right to Comment FinTelegram has invited Comentive Ltd, Super Spin, Rolly Spin, and Norvelic Limited to comment on the allegations and clarify the precise role of the entities involved in payment processing and player-account handling. At the time of publication, no response had been received. Here is a compact summary table you can drop into the report. I’ve phrased the regulation column as site-disclosed / claimed rather than validated regulatory status. The uploaded email chain identifies the same operator and Cyprus payment-agent structure, and the current site disclosures for both brands match that. Summarizing Table Entity typeBrand / EntityDomainSite-disclosed regulationOperator / roleJurisdictionCasino brandSuper Spinsuper-spin.comClaims to be licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros, under License No. ALSI-202505024-FI1.Operated by Comentive LTD (reg. no. 000047924).Brand targets players online; operator disclosed as Belize.Casino brandRolly Spinrollyspin.comClaims to be licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros, under License No. ALSI-202505024-FI1.Site disclosure and player material link it to Comentive LTD.Brand targets players online; operator disclosed as Belize.OperatorComentive LTDn/an/aSite-disclosed owner/operator of Super Spin; same structure also used for Rolly Spin in the source material. Belize registration no. 000047924; source material says formed 9 April 2025 and active.Belize — Sea Urchin Street, San Pedro Town, Ambergris Caye, Belize.Payment agentNorvelic LIMITEDn/an/aDisclosed by both casino sites as payment agent of Comentive LTD;EU/Cyprus payment handler for Super Spin and Rolly Spin. Reg No HE 475930.Cyprus — Avlonos 1, Maria House, 1075 Nicosia, Cyprus.Director Georgia Chrysostomo A careful editorial note you could place under the table: Editorial note: The licensing information above reflects operator website disclosures and source material reviewed by FinTelegram. It should be read as claimed regulatory positioning, not as an independent endorsement of the effectiveness or legitimacy of that regulatory framework. Recent reporting by Le Monde described the broader Anjouan licensing ecosystem as facing serious credibility questions and cited the Comorian central bank’s earlier position that certain supposed offshore authorities and approvals were illegal. Call for Information Whistleblowers, affected players, compliance insiders, and payment professionals: if you have information on Super Spin, Rolly Spin, Comentive Ltd, Norvelic Limited, or the payment rails behind these brands, contact FinTelegram or submit your information via Whistle42. Documented evidence helps identify the financial intermediaries and operational structures behind offshore casino schemes. Share Information via Whistle42

In the Sunday Book Review, Tom Fox considers books that would interest compliance professionals, business executives, or anyone curious. It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest Tom. In this episode, we look at 4 top books released in March by the University of Chicago Press. • Bicentennial by Marc Stein • The Invention of Infinite Growth by Christopher F. Jones • The Means of Prediction by Maximilian Kasy • Against...By: Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist

Might IG Group leave the UK, as a strategic review will look at IG’s domicile and listing venues? The post FX week in review: Swissquote record results, cBridge launch, Admirals restructures, Arsenal CFDs sponsor, IG leaving UK? appeared first on FX News Group.

eToro founder shareholder leaves UK Board Another wave of leadership changes swept the industry this week. Anthony Wollenberg, a founder shareholder and non-executive director of eToro UK, left the company’s board after serving for over 14 years. The move, disclosed in recent filings with Companies House, marked the departure of one of the last board members tied to the platform’s formative period in the UK under FCA regulation.A veteran London-based solicitor aged 76, Wollenberg first joined the board on March 2, 2012, when eToro was still an emerging name in online trading. His long tenure spanned the firm’s transformation from a small, socially focused trading venture into one of the leading global players in fintech.Disclose more about the exit of Anthony Wollenberg from eToro UK Board.RKX Financial appoints ex-Doo Group executive as CEOAt the same time, Roman Kalinin was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of RKX Financial. He brings extensive experience in the trading and brokerage industry, having previously served as Chief Growth Officer at Doo Group and Sales Director at Doo Prime.Kalinin’s move comes as Doo Group undergoes a global restructuring. The firm recently began scaling back its operations in Cyprus, with reports indicating that Doo Prime was vacating its Limassol office after staff reductions. Show more about RKX Financial's appointment of Roman Kalinin as CEO. DIGITEC appoints CME veteran to lead revenue opsDIGITEC, a Hamburg-based FX swaps and NDF pricing technology provider, appointed Jessica Roberts as Head of Revenue Operations and Enablement. It adds a veteran of CME Group and EBS BrokerTec to its growing London office. Roberts joins from CME, where she spent more than seven years in two senior roles, most recently serving as Senior Director of Sales Operations and Enablement. In her new role at DIGITEC, Roberts will oversee revenue strategy and execution, with responsibility for aligning the company’s sales, marketing, and customer success functions. Highlight more about DIGITEC’s appointment of Jessica Roberts as Head of Revenue Operations.Andreas Pilavakis departs FunderProAdditionally, this week, Andreas Pilavakis left FunderPro to become Chief Operating Officer (COO) at GOAT Funded Futures, the futures-focused division of proprietary trading firm GOAT Funded Trader. He previously served as Head of Operations at FunderPro for about 19 months before departing in March, and he is performing his new role remotely from Limassol.Join the inaugural Finance Magnates Singapore Summit 2026, which will bring together brokers, fintechs, banks, EMIs, wealth managers, and hedge funds across APAC.This move marks Pilavakis's first C-suite position in a four-year career largely spent at Cyprus-based proprietary trading firms. He began his prop firm career in 2022 at The Trading Pit as a customer support manager, later becoming head of customer support and then operations manager.Find out more about Andreas Pilavakis's exit from FunderPro for COO role at GOAT Funded Futures.Saxo Bank veteran Casper Solbakken steps downCasper Andreas Solbakken is leaving Saxo Bank after more than two decades with the company. He has been a long-serving executive at the Danish financial institution, contributing to its growth and development over the years.His departure follows recent ownership changes at Saxo Bank. Earlier this month, J. Safra Sarasin Group finalized its acquisition of a majority stake in the trading platform and appointed Daniel Belfer as the new Chief Executive Officer.Display more about the exit of Casper Andreas from Saxo Bank. XS.com names new Retail Sales HeadAnother change came from XS.com, where the firm hired Simon-Peter Massabni as Head of Retail Sales. Massabni, who most recently worked as Country Manager for MENA Commercial Management at Exness, will lead the company’s efforts to grow its retail business globally.He spent nearly three years at Exness in the MENA Commercial Management role, based in Limassol, Cyprus, where he helped set regional commercial plans, managed acquisition and retention activities, oversaw partnership programs, and monitored performance across Middle Eastern and North African markets.Investigate more about XS.com's naming of new Retail Sales Head. This article was written by Jared Kirui at www.financemagnates.com.

Robert Mueller, former special counsel who investigated Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, died Friday.

Good morning, and thank you to the American Society for Public Administration for the Paul Volcker Public Integrity Award. I regret that I cannot be with you in person today, but I am deeply grateful for this award, and for the opportunity to share some reflections. It is a humbling honor just to be mentioned alongside Chairman Volcker. He stands out as a towering figure in economics and central banking, perhaps our greatest public servant in the economic arena. His legacy is one of commitment to serve the public selflessly, courageously, and with the highest degree of integrity. Paul Volcker exemplified integrity in public service, enabling him to earn the trust of presidents and lawmakers from both parties. He served at the Treasury under three presidents—Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon—before leading the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987, nominated by President Carter and reappointed by President Reagan. Non-political, non-partisan service is the bedrock of the Federal Reserve, and no one embodies that virtue more than Paul Volcker. At the Fed, his defining test came in confronting double-digit inflation in the early 1980s. Despite political pressure and a painful recession, he held firm to his commitment to bring inflation down. In a speech at the Economic Club of Chicago on May 19, 1982, with unemployment above 9 percent and critics calling for him to change course, Volcker acknowledged the pain of wringing out inflation through high interest rates but held out the prospect of a return to price stability, and with it a much brighter future. And he deserves a good part of the credit for achieving just that future and launching our economy on a period of low and stable inflation and steady growth that we now look back on as the Great Moderation. His willingness to resist short-term pressures in the interest of achieving lasting price stability demonstrated the courage and long-term perspective that define principled public service. Paul Volcker set an example that all public servants should emulate. His actions remind us that independence and integrity are inseparable—we need independence to do what is right, and we need integrity to use that independence wisely. Ultimately, each of us will want to look back at the arc of our lives and know that we did what was the right thing. As Paul Volcker showed throughout his career, in the end, our integrity is all we have. Thank you again for this humbling honor.