See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization U.S. Jobs by State in 2025—and Where Growth Is Fastest See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways California (18.2M) and Texas (14.5M) employ more people than any other states, anchoring the nation’s largest labor markets. The 10 largest states hold half the country’s jobs, reinforcing how concentrated U.S. employment remains. Job growth in several mid-sized states—including North Carolina (1.5%), South Carolina (1.3%), and Utah (1.2%)—outpaced many larger peers, suggesting that workforce expansion is increasingly happening outside traditional economic powerhouses. This map shows the number of jobs in every U.S. state in 2025, along with each state’s annual job growth rate. California remains the nation’s largest labor market with 18.2 million jobs, followed by Texas at 14.5 million. But the fastest growth isn’t always happening in the biggest states. Several mid-sized states are adding jobs at a faster pace, highlighting where employment is accelerating across the country. The data comes from Arizona State University, based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures. Ranked: The Number of Jobs by State in 2025 Here’s a closer look at where jobs are concentrated—and where growth is accelerating. RankStateNumber of Jobs 2025Annual Job Growth 2024-2025 1California18,187,0000.0% 2Texas14,450,0000.8% 3Florida10,143,0000.4% 4New York10,094,0000.8% 5Pennsylvania6,297,0001.2% 6Illinois6,189,000-0.1% 7Ohio5,724,0000.8% 8North Carolina5,156,0001.5% 9Georgia5,028,0000.1% 10Michigan4,549,0000.7% 11New Jersey4,438,0000.2% 12Virginia4,280,000-0.2% 13Massachusetts3,727,0000.1% 14Washington3,662,000-0.4% 15Tennessee3,440,0000.7% 16Arizona3,311,0000.8% 17Indiana3,299,0000.2% 18Missouri3,068,0001.7% 19Minnesota3,065,0001.2% 20Wisconsin3,054,0000.2% 21Colorado3,019,0000.8% 22Maryland2,848,000-0.5% 23South Carolina2,424,0001.3% 24Alabama2,221,0000.4% 25Kentucky2,065,0000.1% 26Louisiana2,021,0001.1% 27Oregon2,011,0000.2% 28Oklahoma1,819,0000.9% 29Utah1,792,0001.2% 30Connecticut1,727,000-0.1% 31Iowa1,600,0000.1% 32Nevada1,583,000-0.5% 33Kansas1,468,000-0.2% 34Arkansas1,399,0001.2% 35Mississippi1,210,0000.7% 36Nebraska1,059,000-0.6% 37New Mexico909,0001.0% 38Idaho883,0001.2% 39West Virginia718,000-0.4% 40New Hampshire707,000-0.8% 41Hawaii662,0001.0% 42Maine651,000-0.6% 43Montana530,0001.0% 44Rhode Island514,000-0.3% 45Delaware497,0001.1% 46South Dakota473,0000.6% 47North Dakota450,000-0.1% 48Alaska326,0000.0% 49Vermont317,0000.9% 50Wyoming294,000-0.3% Just four states—California, Texas, Florida, and New York—each hold more than 10 million jobs. Together, the top 10 states account for 54% of total U.S. employment. Beyond the top tier, large industrial and population centers like Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, North Carolina, and Georgia each support between 5–6 million jobs. At the other end of the spectrum, the smallest labor markets include: Wyoming: 294,000 jobs Vermont: 317,000 jobs Alaska: 326,000 jobs Population size plays a major role in total employment, but growth tells a more dynamic story. Where Jobs by State Are Accelerating the Fastest While the largest states dominate in absolute size, job growth is happening across a more diverse set of states. Here are among the fastest-growing states by annual job growth rate in 2025: Missouri: 1.7% North Carolina: 1.5% South Carolina: 1.3% Utah: 1.2% Minnesota: 1.2% Arkansas: 1.2% Many of these states are located in the South and Mountain West, regions that have seen high domestic migration, paired with strong demand in healthcare, education, and tech sectors. Which States Are Seeing Slower Momentum? Not every state is expanding. Several states recorded flat or negative job growth, including: California: 0.0% Illinois: -0.1% Washington: -0.4% Maryland: -0.5% New Hampshire: -0.8% Even modest percentage declines can translate into meaningful job losses in large labor markets. These slowdowns can reflect industry-specific pressures, demographic shifts, or cooling post-pandemic recoveries in certain sectors. The New Geography of U.S. Job Growth The largest states continue to dominate in sheer scale. However, job growth is increasingly spread across mid-sized and Sun Belt states. As migration patterns, housing costs, and industry demand evolve, state-level job growth offers a clear signal of where economic momentum is building in 2025. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s fastest-growing jobs by 2030.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: Where Food Inflation Will Hit Hardest in 2026 See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Iran tops the list with a projected 55.9% surge, far above the global average of 3.2%. Currency pressures and prior inflation spikes continue to ripple through food prices. Argentina (33.2%) and Türkiye (25.1%) rank second and third, continuing multi-year inflation trends in both economies. Countries like Malawi, Nigeria, Angola, Zambia, and Ethiopia all rank among the highest projected increases, underscoring ongoing food vulnerability in the region. Food prices remain one of the most persistent cost pressures for households worldwide. In 2026, grocery bills are projected to rise sharply in some countries, while remaining relatively stable in others. According to new forecasts from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), food inflation will vary dramatically across 160 countries in 2026, ranging from double-digit surges in some economies to outright price declines in others. This map ranks 160 countries by their projected year-over-year change in food prices, highlighting where households are likely to face the steepest increases in 2026. The Countries Facing the Steepest Food Price Increases Today, inflation pressures remain strongest in emerging and import-dependent economies. Food inflation is influenced by currency movements, commodity prices, trade disruptions, and domestic supply conditions. Countries experiencing currency depreciation or ongoing economic instability tend to see sharper increases in food costs. RankCountryYear-Over-Year Food Inflation Forecast2026 (%) 1 Iran55.9 2 Argentina33.2 3 Türkiye25.1 4 Haiti24.1 5 Malawi21.2 6 Nigeria17.1 7 Lebanon14.9 8 Angola14.8 9 Kazakhstan12.7 10 Zambia10.8 11 Ethiopia10.1 12 Jamaica9.7 13 Mongolia9.7 14 Kyrgyzstan9.4 15 Ukraine9.2 16 Belarus8.9 17 Solomon Islands8.8 18 Burundi8.8 19 Bangladesh8.3 20 Dominican Republic8.2 21 Georgia8.2 22 Romania7.4 23 Cabo Verde7.2 24 Kuwait7.2 25 Cameroon7.0 26 Azerbaijan6.8 27 Kenya6.8 28 Somalia6.7 29 Tanzania6.7 30 Gambia6.6 31 Canada6.1 32 Tunisia5.7 33 Cayman Islands5.7 34 Madagascar5.6 35 Saint Kitts and Nevis5.6 36 Uzbekistan5.5 37 Paraguay5.3 38 Honduras5.2 39 Curaçao5.1 40 Iceland5.1 41 North Macedonia5.0 42 Rwanda4.9 43 Moldova4.9 44 Botswana4.8 45 Libya4.8 46 Lesotho4.7 47 Antigua and Barbuda4.7 48 Russia4.6 49 Greenland4.5 50 Chile4.5 51 South Africa4.4 52 Slovenia4.3 53 Bhutan4.3 54 Qatar4.2 55 UK4.5 56 Colombia4.1 57 Malta4.0 58 Tajikistan3.8 59 Latvia3.8 60 Ireland3.8 61 Uganda3.7 62 UAE3.6 63 Viet Nam3.6 64 Ghana3.6 65 Pakistan3.5 66 Belize3.5 67 Estonia3.5 68 Bulgaria3.4 69 Austria3.4 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina3.4 71 Mexico3.3 72 Equatorial Guinea3.3 73 Japan3.3 74 Guatemala3.3 75 Sweden3.3 76 Sri Lanka3.2 77 Australia3.2 78 Peru3.1 79 Armenia3.1 80 Mozambique3.1 81 Nicaragua3.1 82 Netherlands2.9 83 Greece2.9 84 Portugal2.9 85 Brazil2.8 86 Indonesia2.8 87 Spain2.7 88 South Korea2.7 89 Luxembourg2.7 90 U.S.2.7 91 Laos2.6 92 Israel2.6 93 Mauritania2.5 94 Norway2.4 95 Montenegro2.4 96 Benin2.4 97 Grenada2.3 98 Côte d'Ivoire2.2 99 Andorra2.2 100 Aruba2.1 101 Italy2.1 102 Senegal2.0 103 Lithuania2.0 104 Oman2.0 105 Barbados2.0 106 Maldives1.9 107 Namibia1.8 108 Germany1.8 109 Malaysia1.7 110 Saudi Arabia1.7 111 Croatia1.6 112 France1.6 113 Slovakia1.6 114 Thailand1.5 115 Iraq1.4 116 Afghanistan1.4 117 Ecuador1.3 118 Albania1.2 119 Nepal1.2 120 New Zealand1.2 121 Poland1.2 122 French Polynesia1.1 123 Philippines1.0 124 Mauritius0.9 125 Trinidad and Tobago0.9 126 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines0.8 127 Singapore0.8 128 Finland0.8 129 Denmark0.7 130 El Salvador0.7 131 Mali0.6 132 Bahrain0.5 133 Papua New Guinea0.4 134 Cyprus0.4 135 Brunei Darussalam0.4 136 Dominica0.4 137 New Caledonia0.1 138 India0.0 139 China0.0 140 Cambodia-0.1 141 Belgium-0.1 142 Egypt-0.2 143 Samoa-0.5 144 Algeria-0.5 145 Djibouti-0.6 146 Burkina Faso-0.8 147 Seychelles-1.3 148 Switzerland-1.3 149 Czechia-1.4 150 Serbia-1.5 151 Jordan-1.7 152 Zimbabwe-1.7 153 Hungary-2.2 154 Chad-2.6 155 Morocco-2.8 156 Fiji-3.5 157 Costa Rica-6.0 158 Togo-6.4 159 Liberia-7.4 160 Niger-18.1 At the top of the ranking is Iran, where food prices are forecast to rise 55.9% year-over-year. Iran’s currency depreciation and prolonged inflationary pressures have already pushed food inflation to extreme levels in recent years. The 2026 forecast suggests those pressures may persist. Several Sub-Saharan African economies—including Nigeria (17.1%), Angola (14.8%), Zambia (10.8%), and Ethiopia (10.1%)—also rank among the highest. In many of these countries, food inflation is closely tied to currency volatility, import dependency, and supply-side disruptions. Regional Differences in Food Inflation While the global average is projected at 3.2%, the regional breakdown shows stark differences in how food prices are expected to evolve in 2026. RegionYear-Over-Year Food Inflation Forecast2026 (%) Middle East & North Africa (MENA)8.9 Latin America4.8 North America4.3 Europe & Central Asia4.2 Sub-Saharan Africa3.8 South Asia2.7 Asia-Pacific1.0 The Middle East and North Africa region stands out, with nearly triple the global average. North America sits around the middle of the pack, with food prices projected to rise 4.3%. In the U.S., prices are expected to increase 2.7%, while in Canada, prices could climb at more than twice that pace. Meanwhile, much of Asia-Pacific is projected to see relatively modest food price growth. While global food inflation is expected to fall in the single digits in 2026, the regional picture tells a far more uneven story. For millions of households in high-inflation economies, grocery bills may remain one of the most persistent economic pressures in the year ahead. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the U.S. cities with the highest grocery costs.

The Countries the U.S. Has the Biggest Trade Deficits With This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways The U.S. goods trade deficit hit a record $1.24 trillion in 2025. China, Mexico, and Vietnam are the three countries the U.S. has the biggest trade deficits with. Tariffs remain a key policy tool as Washington seeks to narrow bilateral trade gaps. In 2025, America imported far more goods than it exported — pushing the U.S. goods trade deficit to a record $1.24 trillion. The top five countries alone account for roughly 67% of the total goods deficit. This chart ranks the 15 countries where the U.S. runs its largest goods trade deficits, led by China, Mexico, and Vietnam. From semiconductors to autos to consumer electronics, these trade relationships underscore how deeply American demand is intertwined with global manufacturing. Data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau, and the visualization was created by Aneesh Anand. The Three Countries Behind Nearly Half the Gap China leads the list with a $202.1 billion deficit, followed closely by Mexico ($196.9 billion) and Vietnam ($178.2 billion). These three countries account for 46% of the overall trade deficit. Notably, several Asian and European export powerhouses dominate the rankings, underscoring deep U.S. integration in global supply chains. RankU.S. Trade Partner2025 Deficit (US$ billion)YoY Change 1 China202.1-32% 2 Mexico196.915% 3 Vietnam178.244% 4 Taiwan146.899% 5 Ireland114.232% 6 Germany73.0-14% 7 Thailand71.958% 8 Japan63.9-8% 9 India58.227% 10 South Korea56.4-14% 11 Canada46.4-25% 12 Switzerland34.3-10% 13 Malaysia30.824% 14 Italy30.8-30% 15 Indonesia23.733% China has long been at the center of U.S. trade tensions. Despite years of tariffs and “decoupling” efforts, the bilateral goods deficit remains above $200 billion. Many consumer electronics, machinery, and intermediate goods still flow from Chinese factories to American buyers. Mexico’s $196.9 billion deficit reflects its growing role as a manufacturing hub tied to U.S. supply chains, particularly in autos and electronics. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s $178.2 billion deficit highlights how production has shifted across Asia as firms diversify away from China. Other countries high up the list include Taiwan ($146.8 billion) and Ireland ($114.2 billion), both key exporters of semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Notably, the U.S. trade deficit with Taiwan nearly doubled year over year, rising 99% in 2025. Why Trade Deficits Draw Political Attention Trade deficits are not inherently “good” or “bad.” They often signal strong consumer demand and capital inflows. However, policymakers frequently view large, persistent deficits as a sign of lost manufacturing capacity or unfair trade practices. While the overall U.S. trade deficit barely budged in 2025, bilateral gaps with certain countries remain politically sensitive. As a result, tariffs have been deployed to raise the cost of imports, encourage domestic production, and pressure trading partners into new agreements. Still, tariffs can also increase costs for businesses and consumers, especially when supply chains are deeply intertwined. For a closer look at what drives these imbalances, see our breakdown of America’s trade deficit by product. Goods vs. Services: A Different Story It’s also important to distinguish between goods and services. While the U.S. runs a massive deficit in goods, it typically posts a surplus in services such as finance, technology, and intellectual property. Looking at both sides of the ledger provides a more complete picture of America’s global economic position. Learn More on the Voronoi App For a deeper dive, check out America’s Services Trade Balances with Its Free Trade Partners on the Voronoi app to see how services surpluses offset goods deficits across key partners.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: How Wealthy the Top 1% Are in Each Major Economy See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways The U.S. has the wealthiest top 1%, with average per capita wealth of $16.4 million, far ahead of other major economies. In America, the top 1% control 35% of all wealth, while the bottom 50% hold just $9,000 per person. Mexico has the highest wealth concentration in this group, with the top 1% holding 37% of national wealth. In the United States, the average member of the top 1% holds $16.4 million in wealth. In Japan, that figure is less than half. In Mexico, it’s $2.7 million. The “top 1%” may sound like a global tier of wealth, but how rich that group actually is depends heavily on where they live. Using the latest data from McKinsey, we rank the world’s major economies by the per capita wealth of their top 1%, adjusted for purchasing power. The results reveal a startling gap: while American elites lead the pack with $16.4 million in wealth, others see a net worth of less than a third of this. Top 1% Net Worth Per Capita in Major Economies Below, we show how the top 1% compares by country, adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP). This shows the true buying power across economies relative to the U.S. dollar: CountryTop 1% Average Per Capita Wealth (PPP)Bottom 50% Average Per Capita Wealth Top 1% Share of Wealth U.S.$16.4M$9K35% Australia$10.6M$36K24% Canada$9.1M$30K24% Germany$9.1M$23K28% France$8.5M$31K27% Italy$7.2M$17K22% South Korea$7.2M$10K26% Japan$6.9M$22K25% UK$5.0M$22K21% China$3.2M$13K30% Mexico$2.7M$3K37% The U.S. has the highest average per capita wealth for their top 1%, surpassing second-ranked Australia by $5.8 million. In stark contrast, U.S. national per capita wealth sits at $470,000, while the bottom 50% holds a net worth of just $9,000, on average. Overall, the American top 1% controls 35% of the nation’s total wealth, a share that is steadily rising. When adjusted for purchasing power, this share accounts for 5% of global wealth, rising to 9% when measured in absolute U.S. dollar terms. While Australia holds the second-highest average at $10.6 million, its internal wealth gap is notably less extreme. Australia’s per capita wealth is comparable at $450,000, yet its bottom 50% holds a significantly higher average net worth of $36,000. Similarly, this distribution pattern is broadly mirrored across Canada and major European economies. In China, average per capita wealth of the top 1% stands at $3.2 million, against a national per capita wealth of $110,000. In fact, China’s bottom 50% holds more wealth per person than the bottom half in the U.S., when adjusted for purchasing power. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on wealth inequality by country.

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: 85% of Babies in 2026 Will Be Born in Asia and Africa See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways 85% of babies born in 2026 will be in Asia or Africa. Asia alone will account for nearly half of global births. Europe, North America, and Oceania combined will represent about 8% of global births. In 2026, 85% of babies worldwide will be born in just two continents: Asia and Africa. Where someone is born can shape everything from access to education and healthcare to long-term economic opportunity. This map shows how global births are distributed across continents, based on population projections from the United Nations. Asia Accounts for Nearly Half of Global Births Asia is expected to see about 64.9 million births in 2026, accounting for roughly 49% of all births worldwide. Despite declining fertility rates in countries like China, Japan, and South Korea, Asia’s sheer population size keeps it at the center of global demographics. ContinentBirths (millions)Share of Global Births Asia64.9 M49.0% Africa47.6 M35.9% Europe6.1 M4.6% Latin America & the Caribbean9.3 M7.0% North America4.0 M3.0% Oceania0.7 M0.5% Antarctica0.0 M0.0% World132.5 M100% South and Southeast Asia, in particular, continue to contribute large numbers of births each year. As a result, nearly one in every two people born in 2026 will be born somewhere in Asia. Africa Makes Up More Than One-Third of Global Births Africa is projected to record 47.6 million births in 2026, representing 35.9% of the global total. This reflects the continent’s high fertility rates and young population structure. Many African countries are still early in their demographic transitions, with limited declines in birth rates so far. As population growth accelerates, Africa’s share of global births has been rising steadily and is projected to increase further later this century. Smaller Shares in the Rest of the World All other continents account for a relatively small share of global births. Latin America and the Caribbean are expected to see 9.3 million births, or 7% of the total, while Europe accounts for just 4.6%. North America’s share stands at 3%, reflecting lower fertility rates despite population growth driven by migration. Oceania contributes 0.5% of births, and Antarctica, with no permanent population, records no births at all. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Safest (and Least Safe) Countries on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Minimum Age Laws for Social Media Around the World See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways A growing number of governments are setting minimum age thresholds for social media, most commonly under 15 or under 16. Australia became the first country to enforce a nationwide under-16 restriction in 2025. European countries account for the majority of new proposals, while several U.S. states have adopted their own rules. Governments around the world are moving to set minimum ages for social media use, citing concerns about online safety and youth mental health. While approaches differ, most policies focus on preventing children below a certain age—typically 15 or 16—from holding accounts, or requiring parental consent and age verification before access is granted. This map highlights 15 countries and two U.S. states that have enacted or are formally considering legal age thresholds for social media platforms, leveraging data from BBC, Reuters, Euro Weekly. The Countries Restricting Social Media for Children Australia made history when its social media ban, a world first, came into force in December 2025. Other countries have since followed suit. The data table below shows the countries and U.S. states that have passed or are discussing social media restrictions, along with the age group that would be affected: CountryRegulation StatusAge Threshold AustraliaPassedUnder 16 GreeceIn discussionUnder 15 FrancePassedUnder 15 SpainIn discussionUnder 16 PortugalPassedUnder 16 NorwayIn discussionUnder 15 MalaysiaPassedUnder 16 United KingdomIn discussionUnder 16 DenmarkIn discussionUnder 15 CzechiaIn discussionUnder 15 SloveniaIn discussionUnder 15 GermanyIn discussionUnder 16 ItalyIn discussionUnder 15 IndonesiaIn discussionUnder 16 New ZealandIn discussionUnder 16 NebraskaPassedUnder 18 VirginiaPassedUnder 16 Australia’s legislation prevents under-16s from accessing social media, including the largest platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube; those who already had accounts were signed out and banned when the law came into force. Social media companies face a fine of up to A$34.9 million if they fail to take “reasonable steps” for age verification. France’s Assembly, its lower house, voted in favor of creating a statutory minimum age of 15 for social media. The proposed law now needs to be passed in the French Senate, or the upper house. Portugal mandated “express and verified parental consent” for anyone under 16 to use social media in a newly-approved bill, while having an outright ban for children under 13. Across Europe, additional proposals are under discussion in countries including Greece, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, and Czechia. Outside Europe, Malaysia has passed age-based restrictions, while Indonesia and New Zealand are considering similar measures. The United Kingdom is also reviewing potential age-limit policies. U.S. States Take Different Approaches In the United States, states have adopted a range of policies. Virginia introduced a law limiting social media use for minors under 16 to one hour per day by default, unless parental consent is provided. Nebraska passed legislation aimed at restricting certain platform features for minors, including design elements such as infinite scrolling and autoplay that are intended to increase engagement. Utah, legislating in 2023, was actually the first to require age verification for under-18s, however the legislation was repealed and replaced with less stringent requirements. Social Media’s Impact on Young People Many of the recent proposals are concentrated in Europe, where regulators have historically taken a more active role in technology and privacy policy. However, the approaches vary widely and do not always amount to outright bans. It comes amid increasing concern around social media’s impacts on young people, who spend 7.5 hours online per day, according to the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Independent evidence suggests that excessive social media use can be harmful, while internal research by Facebook, now Meta, found Instagram made some teenage girls feel worse about their bodies. At the same time, independent researchers have called for more nuanced studies that account for socioeconomic factors, age differences, and specific platform use. Originally developed as a way to connect with friends, social media platforms have also faced criticism over engagement-driven business models built around advertising. The recent wave of age-based laws reflects a broader shift toward increased regulatory oversight of the sector. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about the social media ecosystem, check out this graphic which breaks down ad spending on social media platforms.

Published 6 hours ago on February 23, 2026 By Jenna Ross Graphics & Design Athul Alexander Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Email The following content is sponsored by Terzo Inflation Shock: The Biggest Price Hikes Businesses Are Facing Key Takeaways Wholesale turkey had the largest price increase in 2025, with prices surging by 70%. Metals make up eight of the 15 commodities with the highest inflation. Before households feel inflation at the checkout line, it often starts much earlier in the supply chain. When businesses face rising input costs, those pressures can ripple outward, shaping everything from grocery bills to construction budgets.  Created in partnership with Terzo, this graphic shows where business price hikes have been the most intense. It’s part of our Markets in a Minute series, which delivers quick economic insights for executives. Commodities With the Most Sticker Shock We’ve used data from the Producer Price Index, which tracks the prices businesses pay for inputs like raw materials, energy, and intermediate goods. The table below shows which commodities had the biggest price hikes in 2025. CommodityCategoryDec. 2024 to Dec. 2025 Price Increase Wholesale TurkeyFood & Agriculture 70% Primary Metals*Metals62% Metal Ores*Metals47% Recycled Metals*Metals31% Aluminum ProductsMetals31% Aluminum ScrapMetals25% Wholesale BeefFood & Agriculture 21% Copper ScrapMetals20% Industrial GasesChemical & Industrial18% Nitrogen FertilizersChemical & Industrial18% Steel ProductsMetals17% Portfolio ManagementServices17% Fluid Power Equipment**Chemical & Industrial16% Wire and Cable*Metals15% Inedible Fats & OilsFood & Agriculture 14% *Excluding iron and steel. **Uses pressurized liquid or gas. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, data as of December 2025. One standout: turkeys. Businesses saw wholesale prices rise by 70% in the last year, driven by bird flu outbreaks that reduced supply. Businesses using turkey as a core input, such as deli meat producers, frozen meal manufacturers, and pet food companies will be hit particularly hard. Turkey inflation has also impacted grocers, but companies typically have not passed these prices on to consumers around Thanksgiving. Many retailers treat turkeys as a loss leader, absorbing higher costs to draw shoppers into their stores. Metals: Crowding the Leaderboard of High Inflation Notably, eight of the top 15 biggest price hikes are related to metals. Aluminum prices have been pushed higher by energy-intensive smelting costs, tariffs that have reduced supply, and high demand for the metal in everything from vehicles to AI data centers. Copper has also seen high inflation, driven by tight supply just as demand accelerates from electrification, power grids, and renewable energy infrastructure. Analysts are mixed on what they see coming for copper prices. While Goldman Sachs predicts that copper prices will decline in 2026, J.P. Morgan Global Research expects the rally to continue. To navigate this complexity, leading businesses are turning to smarter tools. Terzo’s all-in-one AI platform, NirvanAI, helps leaders transform company contracts into clear, actionable insights. See NirvanAI in action and learn how it helps you make decisions with confidence. You may also like Business3 weeks ago What a CFO’s Hour is Worth: Ranking the Top Earners Top CFOs are earnings thousands per hour in compensation. Who’s leading the pack, and how much are they making? Markets1 month ago Breaking Down America’s $13 Trillion ETF Market This visualization breaks down the U.S. $13.4 trillion ETF market by asset class, showing how ETFs allocate capital across equities, bonds, and more. Markets2 months ago 2025 in Review: The Ups, Downs, and Returns of Global Markets Which country led stock markets in 2025? See the biggest shocks, rebounds, and year-end returns in this global recap. Markets3 months ago Mapped: The Biggest Housing Bubble Risks Globally Which global cities are most at risk of a housing bubble? This new map ranks the world’s most overheated real estate markets. Technology3 months ago Ranked: The Top Factors That Build AI Trust Want AI your team will trust? Pull back the curtain on the top factors that make people believe in artificial intelligence. Technology3 months ago Ranked: AI Hallucination Rates by Model Find out how common AI hallucination is for leading models, and what that means for the businesses that rely on them. Technology3 months ago The Dangers of AI: Visualizing the Top Risks Companies Face Among the dangers of AI, one stands apart as causing trouble for almost a third of companies. What do leaders need to know? Business3 months ago Ranked: Which Universities Build the Most Entrepreneurs? Which university has had the most alumni become entrepreneurs in the last decade? Hint: its not Stanford or Harvard. Economy4 months ago Mapped: Where Workers Are Supporting the Most Seniors In many advanced economies, the number of retirees is climbing while the working-age population shrinks. What are the countries where workers are supporting the most seniors? Economy4 months ago The United States of Unemployment The national unemployment rate for the U.S. rose to 4.3% in August 2025. But that figure masks vast differences in local labor market health across states. Markets4 months ago Ranked: The Economies Most Dependent on International Trade A trade war has threatened economic ties in 2025. Which economies are most exposed to these shifts in international trade? Economy4 months ago Top Countries Behind U.S. Tariff Revenue Tariff rates vary by country, as does the value of goods each nation exports to the U.S. Which countries contribute the most? Business4 months ago Industries Hiring and Firing the Most Employees As the U.S. labor market cools, which industries are still hiring—and which are cutting back their workforces? Markets5 months ago The $150T Global Debt Market Global debt continues to climb, reaching $150T in Q1 2025. Which countries carry the heaviest burdens? Money5 months ago NEW: Fed Rate Cuts vs. Other G7 Countries How do Fed rate cuts in the U.S. compare with the interest rate changes in other G7 countries, and what does it mean for business? Jobs6 months ago Ranked: The Fastest Growing Jobs (2024-2034) Explore the fastest growing jobs by projected growth rate, plus salary insights, in a rapidly changing job market. Investor Education6 months ago The $127 Trillion Global Stock Market in One Giant Chart This graphic pieces together the $127T global stock market to reveal which countries and regions dominate—and how much equity they control. Personal Finance6 months ago Late to the Ladder: The Rise in First-Time Home Buyers’ Age The median age of first-time home buyers has reached a historic high. See just how long it’s taking people to get on the property ladder. Markets7 months ago Unpacking Real Estate Ownership by Generation (1991 vs. 2025) The Silent Generation’s share of real estate has dropped dramatically as people age, but how have Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials fared? Business7 months ago America’s Economic Engines: The Biggest Industry in Every State Real estate is the biggest industry by GDP in 26 states. Find out why it dominates—and what fuels the rest of the country. Maps7 months ago Mapped: Manufacturing as a Share of GDP, by U.S. State Tariffs are rising to boost American-made goods. Which states gain the most—and least—from manufacturing today? Technology8 months ago Profit Powerhouses: Ranking The Top 10 U.S. Companies by Net Income Collectively, the ten most profitable U.S. companies have a net income of $684 billion—more than the entire GDP of Belgium. Money8 months ago Millionaire Hubs: Mapping the World’s Wealthiest Cities New York City has the highest millionaire population globally. Which other cities attract the world’s wealthiest? Economy8 months ago Tomorrow’s Growth: GDP Projections in Key Economies The global economy is expected to have slighter slower growth going forward. Which countries are on track to have the biggest GDP increases? Money10 months ago Mapped: Interest Rates by Country in 2025 The U.S. has kept their target rate the same at 4.25-4.50%. What do interest rates look like in other countries amid economic uncertainty? Markets11 months ago U.S. Housing Prices: Which States Are Booming or Cooling? The national housing market saw a 4.5% rise in house prices. This graphic reveals which states had high price growth, and which didn’t. Investor Education11 months ago The Silent Thief: How Inflation Erodes Investment Gains If you held a $1,000 investment from 1975-2024, this chart shows how the inflation rate can drastically reduce the value of your money. Politics12 months ago Trade Tug of War: America’s Largest Trade Deficits Trump cites trade deficits—the U.S. importing more than it exports—as one reason for tariffs. Which countries represent the largest deficits? Subscribe Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join 375,000+ email subscribers: *Sign Up

Published 6 hours ago on February 23, 2026 By Ryan Bellefontaine Graphics & Design Abha Patil Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Email The following content is sponsored by Palo Alto Where Attacks Happen in Cyber Intrusions Key Takeaways Most cyber intrusions span multiple surfaces, so detection must connect signals across layers. Identity leads the attack surface list, but endpoints and networks still enable fast pivots. The human layer remains decisive, making awareness and phishing resistance operational priorities. Cyber intrusions rarely follow a single path once attackers get a foothold. Instead, they pivot across systems to widen impact and deepen damage. This graphic, in partnership with Unit 42 by Palo Alto Networks, shows where attacks occur in cyber intrusions, based on data from the Unit 42 Global Incident Response Report. Identity Is the Practical Perimeter Here is a table that breaks intrusions into nine primary attack surfaces observed across investigations. Attack FrontIncidents Percentage Identity89% Endpoints61% Network50% Human45% Email27% Application26% Cloud20% SecOps10% Database1% In Unit 42’s sample, 87% of incidents touched at least two surfaces, and 67% hit three or more. Because the categories overlap, a single case can span multiple layers at once. Identity Dominates, but the “Human Layer” Still Drives Risk Identity appears in 89% of cases, making it the most common surface in the dataset. Meanwhile, endpoints (61%) and networks (50%) remain common launch points for lateral movement.Email (27%) and applications (26%) sit mid-pack, while cloud services appear in 20% of incidents. Still, even “lower” categories matter when attackers chain small wins into bigger access. Humans show up in 45% of incidents, often through user-driven activity that enables the next pivot. Integrated Defenses Beat Siloed Tools Multi-surface activity means point solutions can miss context when attackers hop layers. Teams need shared signals across identity, endpoint, network, app, and cloud to spot chained actions early. SecOps appears in 10% of cases, so attackers sometimes probe security operations tooling and workflows. As a result, integrated detection and response helps contain movement before it reaches databases, which appear in 1% of incidents. See why cyberattacks are getting 4x faster Related Topics: #technology #cyberattacks #phishing #cyber intrusions #social engineering You may also like Privacy6 days ago Visualized: How Cyberattackers Gain Access See how cyberattackers gain access by abusing identity, credentials, sessions, and permissions—and what to fix first. Subscribe Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join 375,000+ email subscribers: *Sign Up

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Trust in the U.S. Government Fell From 77% to 17% See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Public trust in the U.S. federal government fell from 77% in 1964 to 17% in 2025, according to Pew Research. Trust has rarely topped 30% since the early 2000s, with brief spikes during national crises like 9/11. Over the past seven decades, Americans’ trust in the federal government has dropped from postwar highs to historic lows. In 1964, 77% said they trusted Washington to do what is right most of the time. As of September 2025, that figure stands at just 17%. The chart above tracks this long-term shift, using data from Pew Research Center. While trust has occasionally surged during moments of national crisis, the broader trajectory shows a steady erosion across generations. From Postwar Highs to Vietnam-Era Decline Trust peaked in 1964, when 77% of Americans said they trusted the federal government most of the time. Even in 1958, nearly three-quarters of the public expressed confidence in the federal government. That began to change in the late 1960s and early 1970s. By 1970, trust had fallen to 54%, and it slipped further to 36% by 1974 in the aftermath of Watergate. The Vietnam War, political scandals, and economic turbulence reshaped public opinion for decades to come. DateTrust the government (%) 9/28/202517 2/9/202519 5/19/202418 6/11/202319 05/01/202220 4/11/202121 8/2/202024 4/12/202021 3/25/201917 12/04/201718 4/11/201719 10/04/201518 7/20/201419 2/26/201418 11/15/201320 10/13/201319 5/31/201320 02/06/201322 1/13/201323 10/31/201219 10/19/201117 10/04/201115 9/23/201118 8/21/201121 2/28/201123 10/21/201023 10/01/201021 09/06/201023 09/01/201023 04/05/201023 04/05/201022 3/21/201024 2/12/201022 02/05/201021 1/10/201020 12/20/200921 8/31/200922 6/12/200923 12/21/200825 10/15/200824 10/13/200824 07/09/200724 01/09/200728 10/08/200629 9/15/200630 02/05/200631 1/20/200633 01/06/200632 12/02/200532 9/11/200531 09/09/200530 6/19/200535 10/15/200439 7/15/200441 3/21/200438 10/26/200336 7/27/200343 10/15/200246 09/04/200246 09/02/200240 7/13/200240 6/17/200243 1/24/200246 12/07/200149 10/25/200154 10/06/200149 1/17/200144 10/31/200038 10/15/200042 07/09/200039 04/02/200038 2/14/200034 10/03/199936 9/14/199933 5/16/199933 2/21/199931 2/12/199932 02/04/199934 1/10/199934 01/03/199937 12/01/199833 11/15/199830 11/01/199826 10/26/199828 8/10/199831 2/22/199835 02/01/199833 1/25/199832 1/19/199832 10/31/199731 8/27/199731 06/01/199726 1/14/199727 11/02/199627 10/15/199628 5/12/199631 05/06/199629 11/19/199527 08/07/199522 08/05/199521 3/19/199520 2/22/199521 12/01/199421 10/29/199422 10/23/199420 06/06/199419 1/30/199420 1/20/199422 3/24/199325 1/17/199325 1/14/199325 10/23/199225 10/15/199225 06/08/199229 10/20/199135 03/06/199142 03/01/199146 1/27/199140 12/01/199033 10/28/199032 09/06/199035 1/16/199038 6/29/198939 1/15/198941 11/10/198843 10/15/198841 1/23/198840 10/18/198743 06/01/198743 03/01/198744 1/21/198743 1/19/198742 12/01/198644 11/30/198643 09/09/198644 1/19/198644 11/06/198543 7/29/198542 3/21/198540 2/27/198542 2/22/198545 11/14/198444 10/15/198441 12/01/198239 11/07/198032 10/15/198030 3/12/198027 11/03/197928 12/01/197831 10/23/197732 4/25/197734 10/15/197636 09/05/197635 6/15/197635 03/01/197634 02/08/197635 12/01/197436 10/15/197253 12/01/197054 10/15/196862 12/01/196665 10/15/196477 12/01/195873 Temporary Surges During National Crises Although the long-term trend is downward, trust has occasionally rebounded during moments of national unity. After the 9/11 attacks, trust jumped from 44% to 54% in a matter of months. It was one of the last times a majority expressed confidence in Washington. Similar, though smaller, increases occurred during other crises. In early 2020, trust briefly rose to 24% amid the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these bumps have proven short-lived, with trust quickly returning to lower levels. A New Era of Persistent Low Trust Since the mid-2000s, trust in government has rarely crossed the 30% mark. In the 2010s and early 2020s, it often dipped below 20%. As of September 2025, just 17% of Americans say they trust the federal government most of the time — near the lowest level recorded in Pew’s time series. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out America’s Growing Mountain of Debt on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: The U.S. States With the Most Tech Jobs in 2025 See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways The top three states (CA, NY, TX) alone account for over 1 million tech jobs, highlighting how concentrated the industry remains. Washington (171,000) and Florida (161,000) round out the top five, forming a clear upper tier well ahead of the rest of the country. Utah (+6.3%), Illinois (+5.7%), and South Carolina (+4.8%) posted the fastest annual growth rates, signaling momentum beyond the largest tech hubs. California alone employs more than half a million tech workers, nearly twice as many as the next closest state. This map shows where America’s tech jobs are located in 2025, highlighting how heavily the industry is concentrated in just a handful of states. Figures are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data via Arizona State University. Ranked: Tech Jobs by State in 2025 Nationwide, tech employment totals roughly 3.2 million workers in 2025. In the below table, we break down the number of tech jobs in each state, along with its growth rate over the last year. RankStateNumber of Jobs 2025 Annual Job Growth 1California524K-2.8% 2New York286K0.0% 3Texas226K-2.0% 4Washington171K3.0% 5Florida161K0.5% 6Georgia112K-6.7% 7Illinois98K5.7% 8Massachusetts92K0.3% 9Pennsylvania88K-2.0% 10North Carolina85K-0.9% 11Colorado77K4.6% 12New Jersey70K-4.5% 13Virginia69K-4.2% 14Ohio67K1.4% 15Michigan57K-0.4% 16Tennessee55K-0.7% 17Wisconsin48K-1.6% 18Arizona48K-0.6% 19Missouri45K-2.8% 20Utah44K6.3% 21Minnesota41K-4.2% 22Oregon36K-0.8% 23Maryland34K-1.2% 24South Carolina31K4.8% 25Connecticut30K-0.7% 26Indiana26K-1.1% 27Alabama23K0.4% 28Kentucky21K-1.0% 29Nevada20K-0.5% 30Oklahoma18K2.3% 31Louisiana18K-4.7% 32Iowa18K0.0% 33Kansas18K2.3% 34Nebraska17K-2.3% 35Arkansas12K-4.1% 36New Hampshire11K-0.9% 37Mississippi10K-1.0% 38Idaho9K0.0% 39New Mexico9K-11.0% 40Hawaii8K-2.4% 41West Virginia8K-1.3% 42Maine8K-4.8% 43North Dakota5K1.9% 44Montana5K-5.3% 45South Dakota5K0.0% 46Rhode Island5K-7.1% 47Vermont4K-6.5% 48Alaska4K-4.7% 49Delaware4K0.0% 50Wyoming3K-3.3% With 524,000 tech workers, California employs 18% of the nation’s tech workforce across over 61,000 firms. Still, the state shed thousands of tech jobs last year, given economic uncertainty and the spillover effects of AI. Overall, tech jobs contracted 2.8% in 2025. New York follows, with 286,000 tech workers, equal to one in 10 jobs nationwide. In 2025, tech job growth was effectively flat. Ranking in third is Texas, with tech employment standing at 226,000. As a growing tech hub, the state has added over 26,000 roles in the sector since 2020. Last year, however, the number of roles contracted by 2%. In contrast to these heavyweight states, several smaller tech hubs posted strong job growth. Utah’s tech workforce totals just 44,000, yet employment climbed 6.3% in 2025. Illinois, South Carolina, and Colorado—each with fewer than 100,000 tech jobs—saw gains of 5.8%, 4.8%, and 4.6%, respectively. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s top 50 science and technology clusters.

Charted: Who Believes in Aliens, Bigfoot and the Chupacabra? This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways 56% of Americans say aliens definitely or probably exist. Only 28% believe Bigfoot exists, while 16% believe in the chupacabra. Belief in the unknown, whether extraterrestrials or legendary creatures, remains surprisingly common in America. The visualization above, created by Julie Peasley using data from YouGov, explores how likely U.S. adults think it is that aliens, Bigfoot, and the chupacabra exist. Here’s how Americans responded when asked how likely each being exists, according to YouGov: EntityDefinitely ExistsProbably ExistsProbably Does Not ExistDefinitely Does Not ExistNot Sure Aliens18%38%16%15%14% Bigfoot4%24%27%33%12% The Yeti3%20%28%32%17% Chupacabra3%13%29%31%24% Loch Ness Monster3%19%29%35%14% Aliens clearly stand apart. A majority (56%) say extraterrestrials definitely or probably exist, more than double the share who believe in Bigfoot, and more than triple belief in the chupacabra. Aliens: From Fringe to Mainstream? Interest in extraterrestrial life has grown steadily, fueled by government disclosures and increased reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). According to YouGov, 56% of Americans say aliens definitely (18%) or probably (38%) exist. That makes extraterrestrials far more plausible in the public mind than either Bigfoot or the chupacabra. YouGov’s polling also finds that roughly half of Americans believe aliens have visited Earth. In addition, about one-third say UFO sightings are evidence of alien spacecraft, while others attribute them to natural phenomena, secret military technology, or optical illusions. Demographic differences are notable. Younger Americans are generally more likely to believe in extraterrestrials than older cohorts, and men tend to express higher levels of belief than women. Taken together, the data suggests that belief in aliens has moved well beyond the fringe. While skepticism remains, the idea that intelligent life exists somewhere beyond Earth is now a mainstream view in the United States. Globally, belief varies widely. We previously mapped the countries that believe in aliens the most, showing that views differ significantly across regions and cultures. Bigfoot: America’s Favorite Cryptid Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, is a legendary ape-like creature said to inhabit forests in North America. While 28% of Americans say Bigfoot probably or definitely exists, a larger share (60%) say it probably or definitely does not. Compared to aliens, belief in Bigfoot is far more polarized, with fewer “not sure” responses. Despite the skepticism, Bigfoot remains deeply embedded in pop culture, particularly in the Pacific Northwest. What Is the Chupacabra? The chupacabra, which translates to “goat sucker” in Spanish, is a cryptid said to attack livestock, particularly in Latin America and the southern United States. Only 16% of Americans believe it exists, while 60% say it likely or definitely does not. Notably, nearly a quarter (24%) say they are not sure, which is a higher uncertainty than for aliens or Bigfoot. This suggests that while the chupacabra is less widely believed, it remains a mysterious figure in American folklore. Learn More on the Voronoi App Curious how beliefs in extraterrestrials connect to UFO sightings? Explore One Third of Americans Believe UFO Sightings are Aliens on the Voronoi app for more data-driven insights into what Americans think about life beyond Earth.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: Where Food Insecurity Is Highest, State by State See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Arkansas (19.4%), Kentucky (18.8%), and Louisiana (17.7%) report the highest shares of food-insecure households. Texas (11.5 million households total) combines a high rate (17.6%) with a large population. California, while closer to the national average (12.5%), has roughly 14 million food-insecure households. In parts of the United States, nearly one in five households struggle to afford enough food. The latest data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reveals stark geographic divides in food insecurity across the country. While the national average sits at 13.3%, several states—concentrated largely in the South—report rates far above that level. This map breaks down where food insecurity is highest by state, highlighting the regional inequalities shaping access to basic necessities in America today. Ranked: Food Insecurity Rates by State For the analysis, the USDA surveyed 32,719 households between 2022 and 2024 on their level of food insecurity. Food insecurity is considered as the lack of consistent access to enough nutritious food, driven by limited financial resources. The table below shows state averages over the period. RankStateShare of HouseholdsAverage Number of Households 1Arkansas19.4%1.3M 2Kentucky18.8%1.8M 3Louisiana17.7%1.9M 4Texas17.6%11.5M 5Mississippi17.3%1.2M 6Oklahoma16.9%1.6M 7Wyoming15.6%0.2M 8Nevada15.0%1.3M 9Michigan14.7%4.2M 10Georgia14.6%4.3M 11New Mexico14.5%0.9M 12Ohio14.2%4.9M 13West Virginia14.1%0.7M 14New York14.0%7.9M 15Indiana13.7%2.8M 16South Carolina13.5%2.3M 17Florida13.3%9.3M 18Illinois13.3%5.1M 19Missouri13.3%2.6M 20Tennessee13.3%3.0M 21Arizona13.1%2.9M 22Alaska13.0%0.3M 23Maine12.9%0.6M 24Nebraska12.7%0.8M 25Idaho12.6%0.8M 26California12.5%14.0M 27Kansas12.5%1.2M 28Oregon12.5%1.7M 29Virginia12.4%3.5M 30Alabama12.1%2.1M 31Connecticut12.1%1.4M 32Wisconsin12.0%2.5M 33North Carolina11.8%4.4M 34Massachusetts11.7%2.8M 35Montana11.7%0.5M 36Maryland11.5%2.3M 37Utah11.5%1.2M 38Washington11.0%3.2M 39Pennsylvania10.9%5.3M 40Delaware10.8%0.4M 41Hawaii10.8%0.5M 42Iowa10.8%1.4M 43Rhode Island10.6%0.4M 44Colorado10.5%2.4M 45District of Columbia10.3%0.3M 46Minnesota9.9%2.3M 47New Jersey9.8%3.6M 48South Dakota9.5%0.4M 49Vermont9.4%0.3M 50New Hampshire9.1%0.6M 51North Dakota9.0%0.3M Arkansas reports the highest rate at 19.4%, followed by Kentucky (18.8%), Louisiana (17.7%), Texas (17.6%), and Mississippi (17.3%). Many of these states also have lower median household incomes, higher poverty rates, larger rural populations, and greater reliance on public assistance programs. This overlap suggests food insecurity is closely tied to broader structural economic conditions, rather than short-term fluctuations alone. By contrast, states like North Dakota (9.0%), New Hampshire (9.1%), and Vermont (9.4%) report rates closer to one in 10 households. The result is a more than 10 percentage-point gap between the highest and lowest states. Large States Shape the National Picture While percentages tell one part of the story, population size tells another. Texas, for example, combines a high food insecurity rate (17.6%) with more than 11 million households, meaning millions of families are affected. California, with approximately 14 million households, reports a rate of 12.5%, yet still accounts for a substantial share of food-insecure households due to its size. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the number of households living in poverty by state.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: The Countries With the Most McDonald’s Per Person See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways McDonald’s is found in 100 markets worldwide, but is easiest to find in Macau (56.8 locations per one million people), Saint Martin (43.2), and the United States (38.6). Despite their similar populations, China has 10x the number of McDonald’s locations as India. McDonald’s has had an unstoppable rise over the last six decades on its path to become the world’s most successful fast food chain, with locations across the world. But which countries have the most McDonald’s locations per person? This world map highlights the classic burger chain’s worldwide presence by counting how many McDonald’s locations each country has per 1 million people. The data for this map comes from the company’s Restaurant Count by Market 2024 report. Burger-lovers and shake aficionados can find the famed golden arches across the world, albeit with relatively more ease in high-density markets like Australia, Canada, Macau, and the United States. McDonald’s Locations Per Person, by Country Among large countries, the U.S. is a natural McDonald’s hub, hosting 38.6 locations for each million inhabitants. This is third only to the small Chinese special administrative region of Macau (56.8) and the Caribbean island of St. Marten (43.2). This data table below demonstrates how many McDonald’s each country hosts per million citizens: CountryMcDonald's locations per one million people Macau56.8 St. Maarten43.2 United States (Includes Cuba, Guam, and Saipan)38.6 Australia (Includes American Samoa, Fiji, New Caledonia, Tahiti, and Western Samoa)37.2 Canada36.1 Virgin Islands34.8 Hong Kong34.6 New Zealand32.5 Curacao32.1 Puerto Rico29.3 Aruba27.8 Martinique27.8 Qatar27.6 Singapore25.2 Japan24.1 Guadeloupe23.4 France (Includes Monaco)23.2 Israel23.1 Austria22.4 United Kingdom (Includes Isle of Man, Jersey, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales)21.2 Bahrain20.8 Switzerland (Includes Liechtenstein)20.3 Reunion Island20.1 Portugal19.5 United Arab Emirates19.1 Denmark18.9 Sweden18.8 Kuwait18.6 Panama17.9 Taiwan17.8 Luxembourg17.7 Ireland17.6 Cyprus16.9 Germany16.4 Poland15.9 Malta15.8 Norway15.3 Costa Rica14.8 Netherlands14.6 Finland14.4 Mauritius13.6 Slovenia13.2 Spain (Includes Andorra and Gibraltar)13.0 Brunei13.0 Italy12.8 Saudi Arabia12.5 Croatia12.2 Hungary12.0 Czech Republic11.7 Malaysia10.5 French Guiana10.1 Uruguay10.0 Belgium10.0 Slovakia8.7 Estonia8.0 South Korea7.7 Latvia7.5 Bahamas7.5 Philippines6.8 Georgia6.8 Bulgaria6.7 Oman6.6 South Africa6.3 Guatemala6.2 Lithuania6.2 Chile5.7 Romania5.6 Brazil5.5 Serbia5.5 Argentina4.9 Mainland China4.8 Moldova4.6 Jordan4.0 Lebanon4.0 El Salvador3.9 Paraguay3.9 Greece3.4 Thailand3.3 Ukraine3.3 Turkey3.2 Suriname3.2 Trinidad/Tobago2.9 Mexico2.9 Azerbaijan2.8 Venezuela2.8 Dominican Republic2.0 Morocco2.0 Ecuador1.9 Egypt1.6 Colombia1.4 Nicaragua1.3 Honduras1.2 Indonesia1.1 Peru0.9 India0.5 Vietnam0.4 Pakistan0.3 Macau’s neighbor, Hong Kong, is also home to many McDonald’s locations in a short area, while Australia, Canada, and New Zealand can all boast having at least 32 locations per each million of their inhabitants. Asia’s Divide in McDonald’s Locations McDonald’s has clearly had far better success penetrating the markets of East Asia over South Asia. For proof of this, look only to Asia’s two giants, China and India. Despite having a similar population of over 1.4 billion people, China today hosts nearly 5 McDonald’s locations per each million of its citizens, a 10x multiplier over neighboring India’s mere 0.5 figure. Even slightly smaller neighboring countries hold true to this division of success. Japan is home to the third-most McDonald’s locations worldwide, and features 24.1 sites per million people, while Pakistan is the country with the fewest per-capita locations in the world, at just 0.3. Regions with the Most Market Potential for McDonald’s While McDonald’s has found significant successes across Eurasia and the Americas, Africa and the Middle East serve as the prime markets for future expansion. Africa’s largest country, Egypt, has merely 1.6 per-capita locations, slightly behind Morocco (2) and South Africa (6.3). These three countries are the only ones to host the golden arches anywhere on the continent, over 30 years after the company made its African market entry. Meanwhile, Qatar (27.6) and Israel (23.1) hold the most per-capita locations in the Middle East, and Kuwait (10.6) is home to the chain’s largest Middle Eastern location. For McDonald’s, there remains ample room for growth in the coming years. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The 50 Largest Cities in Africa by Population on Voronoi.

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Arctic Ice Loss Since 1980, Compared to Countries See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways The Arctic has lost 1.1 million square miles of sea ice since 1980, roughly the size of Argentina. At current trends, it could see nearly ice-free summers by 2050. Since 1980, the Arctic’s summer sea ice has shrunk at a rate of 12.2% per decade, dramatically reshaping the polar region and opening new geopolitical and shipping dynamics. This graphic shows the size of Arctic ice loss since 1980 compared to country land masses, based on data from NASA and the World Bank Group. With such significant amounts of ice loss, these changes to the Arctic are opening up global shipping routes, which can be half as long as traditional routes. How Much Arctic Ice Has Melted? Arctic sea ice fluctuates over the course of the year, with the most shipping activity occurring when it is at its smallest point, known as its annual minimum ice extent. This annual minimum ice extent has shrunk the equivalent of tens of thousands of square miles each year. Below, we compare the change in minimum ice extent from 1980 to 2025 to the world’s largest countries by land area: CountryLand Area (Millions of Square Miles) Russia6.2 China3.6 U.S.3.5 Canada3.4 Brazil3.2 Australia3.0 India1.2 Arctic Ice Loss (1980-2025)1.1 Argentina1.1 Kazakhstan1.0 Algeria0.9 DRC0.9 Saudi Arabia0.8 Mexico0.8 Indonesia0.7 Sudan0.7 In 1980, the Arctic’s minimum ice extent was 1.1 million square miles (2.8 million km²) larger than it was in 2025. Given this rapid ice melt, the Arctic region is projected to be “ice-free” in the summer as soon as 2050. Not only has Greenland been under intense focus, but the Arctic region will become increasingly important for shipping, security, and economic reasons. How Global Powers are Preparing for an Ice-Free Arctic Today, multiple countries including China, Russia, Europe, and the U.S. have developed national strategies for the Arctic region given its growing geopolitical importance. In 2018, China introduced the idea of a “Polar Silk Road,” centered on the Northern Sea Route. This Arctic passage could reduce travel time by nearly 20 days compared to the Suez Canal and is about 40% shorter for ships traveling between China and Northern Europe. Moreover, the Arctic holds an estimated 412 billion barrels of undiscovered oil. Greenland’s rare earth reserves alone are estimated to be 1.5 million metric tons, the eighth-highest in the world. While there has been no rare earth production, melting ice could present huge opportunities should local regulations ease. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this map explainer on the territory of Greenland.

Published 2 hours ago on February 21, 2026 By Cody Good Graphics & Design Jennifer West Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Email The following content is sponsored by Dubai Future Forum Beyond the Depths: Exploring the Ocean’s Future Key Takeaways Exploring the ocean is key to identifying the 0% of marine species estimated yet to be discovered, holding immense scientific and commercial potential. Ocean investment opportunities are projected to exceed $3 trillion as new technologies and solutions emerge. The ocean has long been a frontier of mystery and untapped promise. Covering over 70% of the planet, it plays a critical role in climate regulation, biodiversity, and global trade. Despite this, much of the ocean remains unexplored, creating both risks and opportunities as humanity looks to the future. In partnership with Dubai Future Forum, this graphic shows how exploration, investment, and innovation are converging to transform our understanding of the ocean. It’s one of four dimensions—Ocean, Mind, Space, and Land—within the Forum’s larger theme, Exploring the Unknown. The data comes from these sources: Seabed 2030 World Register of Marine Species OECD UNCTAD Morgan Stanley The Global 50 Report by Dubai Future Foundation. Exploring the Ocean The ocean’s seafloor remains largely uncharted, with just over 27% mapped to modern standards. Strikingly, the remaining 73% of unmapped seafloor is larger than all Earth’s landmass combined. Without detailed ocean maps, humanity remains blind to features that may influence everything from tectonic activity to biodiversity hotspots. Biodiversity: Discovering Ocean Life Every year, ocean scientists identify and catalog thousands of new marine species, yet they estimate that 91% of ocean life remains unidentified. Here is a table that shows known cumulative discovered marine species over time: YearCumulative Discovered Marine Species 17601,477 17803,646 18008,094 182015,299 184030,492 186059,687 188088,253 1900121,236 1920157,149 1940188,913 1960213,705 1980252,738 2000293,526 2020338,584 2025347,360 Each discovery made while exploring the oceans adds to our scientific understanding and may unlock potential for breakthroughs in medicine and technology. The Blue Economy’s Rising Tide Financial commitments to ocean-related initiatives doubled between 2010 and 2023. Morgan Stanley projects even greater potential for the future with over $3 trillion in ocean investment opportunities to add to the global economy. Here is a table that shows ocean funding by sector, comparing 2010 to 2023: Sector2010 ($ Millions)2023 ($ Millions) Maritime Transport1,0522,418 Marine Fisheries & Other Industries392743 Marine Protection372990 Other115515 Health & Rehabilitation400101 Ocean Policy & Management180138 Energy & Minerals5138 The largest opportunity is in decarbonizing marine transportation valued at $1,200B, followed by marine ecosystem protection ($1,100B), renewable energy ($840B), and sustainable aquaculture ($225B). Looking Ahead: The Future of Oceans The ocean’s future is being driven by rapid advances in pollution remediation and energy developments. To continue exploring the ocean and its biggest emerging opportunities shaping the future with the Dubai Future Foundation’s Global 50 report. Learn more about the Dubai Future Forum. You may also like Innovation4 weeks ago Ranked: How Global R&D Spending Growth Has Shifted Since 2000 As global R&D spending hits all-time highs, we rank the top 20 countries with the fastest-growth in R&D expenditure since 2000. Technology5 months ago Ranked: The World’s Most Innovative Countries in 2025 Explore the most innovative countries in 2025, with Switzerland, South Korea, and China making major moves in the Global Innovation Index. Technology8 months ago Charted: The Rise of China’s R&D Spending China’s R&D spending has grown nearly sixfold in the last two decades. Innovation8 months ago Mapped: The Top 50 Global Science and Technology Clusters Asia dominates the global innovation landscape, with 15 of the top 50 science and technology clusters in China. Innovation10 months ago These 18 Industries Could Reshape the Global Economy by 2040 Discover the biggest industries in 2040, from AI to biotech, as emerging sectors generate up to $48 trillion in revenue. Maps1 year ago Mapped: Venture Capital Deal Value by Region (1997 vs. 2023) In the last two decades, Asia has overtaken Europe when it comes to cornering venture capital deals. China is a big part of that success. Subscribe Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join 375,000+ email subscribers: *Sign Up

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: The Share of Each Country That Lives in Its Largest City See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways In some countries, nearly 100% of urban residents live in a single city. In giants like the U.S., China, and India, less than 10% live in their largest metro. Globally, just 16% of urban residents live in their country’s biggest city. In some nations, one city towers over the rest. In others, populations are spread across multiple large metros with no single dominant hub. This map shows the share of each country’s urban population living in its largest city, revealing where megacities dominate and where people are far more dispersed. The data for this map comes from the World Bank. Globally, only 16% of urban residents live in their country’s largest city, suggesting that in most places, population and economic activity are distributed across several urban centers rather than concentrated in just one. The Most Heavily-Concentrated Countries Worldwide The city-state of Singapore, alongside the two Chinese special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau, top the list, while giants like China, India, Russia, and the United States see less than 10% of their population reside in their largest cities. This data table below shows each country’s share of urban population living in the country’s largest city: CountryShare of urban population living in the country's largest city Hong Kong SAR, China100% Macao SAR, China100% Singapore100% Eritrea91% Puerto Rico (U.S.)81% Paraguay74% Trinidad and Tobago74% Djibouti71% Guinea-Bissau68% Kuwait68% Mongolia68% Panama68% Congo, Rep.67% Liberia56% Armenia55% Uruguay55% North Macedonia54% Burkina Faso50% Mauritania50% Israel49% Togo49% Georgia48% Latvia48% Estonia47% Haiti47% Bahrain46% Lebanon46% Moldova46% Portugal46% Egypt, Arab Rep.45% Kyrgyz Republic45% Afghanistan43% Dominican Republic43% Bangladesh42% Central African Republic42% Azerbaijan41% Chile40% Oman40% Guinea39% Madagascar39% Mali39% Peru39% Albania38% Gabon38% Greece38% New Zealand38% Argentina37% Burundi37% Equatorial Guinea37% Ireland37% Sudan37% Tajikistan37% Angola36% Costa Rica36% Jamaica36% Malawi36% Congo, Dem. Rep.35% Senegal35% Cote d'Ivoire34% Myanmar34% Sierra Leone34% Serbia34% Zambia34% Cambodia33% Tanzania33% United Arab Emirates32% Finland32% Japan32% Malaysia32% Namibia32% Austria31% Guatemala31% Croatia31% Kenya31% Niger31% Rwanda30% Chad30% Belarus29% Cameroon29% Qatar29% Tunisia29% Colombia28% Ecuador28% Gambia, The28% Bulgaria27% Lithuania27% Nicaragua27% Denmark26% Hungary26% Papua New Guinea26% Saudi Arabia26% Somalia, Fed. Rep.26% Turkmenistan26% Uganda26% Cuba25% Honduras25% Iraq25% Thailand25% Viet Nam25% Korea, Rep.24% Lao PDR24% Norway24% El Salvador24% Zimbabwe24% Philippines23% Yemen, Rep.23% Australia22% Bolivia22% Mexico22% Belgium21% Bosnia and Herzegovina21% France21% Jordan21% Turkiye21% Canada19% Switzerland19% Ghana19% Korea, Dem. People's Rep.19% South Sudan19% Ethiopia18% Libya18% Pakistan18% Romania18% Sweden18% Benin17% Czechia17% Spain17% United Kingdom17% Morocco17% West Bank and Gaza17% European Union16% Kazakhstan16% South Africa16% Mozambique15% Slovak Republic15% Syrian Arab Republic15% Iran, Islamic Rep.14% Sri Lanka14% Uzbekistan14% Brazil12% Russian Federation12% Venezuela, RB12% Italy11% Nigeria11% Ukraine11% Algeria8% Nepal8% Poland8% Indonesia7% India7% Netherlands7% United States7% Germany5% China3% Even within similar regions, there are clear gaps. Roughly a fifth of Britons, Spaniards, and Frenchmen reside in their national capitals and largest cities; in contrast, Germans and Poles are far more spread out across their countries. Across the 27-member European Union, no subregion is more concentrated than the Baltic states: Estonia and Latvia lead the continent with 47-48% of their populations residing in the national capitals of Tallinn and Riga. Disparate Population Distribution in the Americas North and South America are home to some of the world’s largest cities, from São Paulo and Mexico City to New York and Toronto. Yet in each of these cases the sprawling metropolises tend to actually hold a smaller share of the citizenry than smaller capital cities such as Lima, Asuncion, or Montevideo. For many countries in the region, such as Argentina or Colombia, post-independence history has been fraught with concerns over centralization versus decentralization. What are Primate Cities? The term “primate city” was first coined in 1939 by geographer Mark Jefferson to describe any city that is “at least twice as large as the next largest city and more than twice as significant” within a given country. Modern capitals such as Algiers, Paris, Bangkok, and Buenos Aires are classic primate city case studies, serving as the economic, demographic, and social centers of their respective countries. Countries with primate cities often see a heavy concentration of economic output, infrastructure, and internal migration in one metropolitan area. By contrast, federal systems such as Brazil, India, and the United States tend to develop multiple large cities that balance national influence. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The 50 Largest Cities in Africa by Population on Voronoi.

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The World’s 10 Deadliest Viruses by Fatality Rate See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Rabies has a near-100% fatality rate once symptoms develop, though infections are largely preventable with early treatment. Most of the world’s deadliest viruses originate in animals, including bats, rodents, camels, and birds. Some viruses infect millions but kill relatively few. Others spread less widely yet prove far more lethal once contracted. This graphic ranks 10 of the world’s deadliest viruses by case fatality rate: the percentage of infected people who die from the disease. Rabies tops the list, with a fatality rate approaching 100% once symptoms appear. The data for this visualization comes from various sources such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the BC Centre for Disease Control, the Australian Government, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Reuters, and the UK Government. Rabies: Almost Universally Fatal The virus kills an estimated 59,000 people per year, primarily in Africa and Southeast Asia. The virus spreads primarily through the saliva of infected animals, especially dogs. Despite being vaccine-preventable, rabies still causes thousands of deaths, mainly in Africa and Southeast Asia. Limited access to post-exposure treatment is a key reason for its continued toll. VirusFatality RateHuman Death Toll Rabies~100%59,000 per year B Virus (Herpes B)80%21 total deaths Lujo Virus80%4 total deaths Nipah Virus40–75%600 total deaths Hendra Virus57%4 total deaths Ebola50%15,000+ total deaths Marburg Virus50%470+ total deaths H5N1 (Avian Influenza)50%477 total deaths Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF)10–40%1,000–2,000 per year MERS-CoV36%959 total deaths Hemorrhagic Fevers: Ebola, Marburg, and CCHF Several of the viruses on the list cause viral hemorrhagic fevers, including Ebola, Marburg, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF). These diseases often lead to severe internal bleeding and organ failure. Ebola and Marburg both have fatality rates around 50%, with outbreaks concentrated in Central and Sub-Saharan Africa. The 2014–2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak alone killed over 11,000 people and brought global attention to epidemic preparedness. CCHF, transmitted primarily through ticks and livestock, is more geographically widespread across Eurasia and Africa. While its fatality rate ranges from 10–40%, it causes an estimated 1,000–2,000 deaths annually. Zoonotic Spillover: From Bats to Camels Most of the viruses ranked here originate in animals. Fruit bats are linked to Nipah and Marburg viruses, while rodents are associated with Lujo virus. Camels are the primary reservoir for MERS-CoV, first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012. Avian influenza (H5N1) spreads from infected birds and has a roughly 50% fatality rate among confirmed human cases—far higher than seasonal flu. Although human infections remain relatively rare, the high case fatality rate has kept global health authorities on alert. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Countries With the Biggest Gains in Life Expectancy on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Charted: South Korea’s Aging Population Key Takeaways Over 150 years, South Korea’s age structure shifts from youth-heavy to senior-dominated. By 2100, nearly 40% of the population is projected to be 65 or older. In 1950, South Korea’s population was overwhelmingly young. By 2100, nearly four in ten residents are projected to be 65 or older. This visualization, created by Oscar Leo of DataCanvas using data from the UN World Population Prospects 2024, shows how South Korea’s age distribution evolves year by year across a 150-year span. The result is one of the most dramatic demographic transformations ever recorded in a developed economy. Age Distribution by Year (1950-2100P) Below we can see how the population distribution changes each year between 1950 and the 2100 projection. Year0–910–1920–2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–7980–89 195029.9%22.3%15.1%12.0%9.1%6.5%3.6%1.1%0.3% 195129.5%23.1%14.9%11.9%9.1%6.4%3.7%1.1%0.3% 195229.1%23.7%14.9%11.9%9.2%6.2%3.7%1.1%0.2% 195328.8%23.9%14.9%12.0%9.2%6.1%3.7%1.1%0.2% 195428.8%23.8%15.1%12.1%9.2%6.0%3.8%1.1%0.2% 195528.9%23.4%15.4%12.1%9.2%5.9%3.8%1.2%0.1% 195629.1%23.1%15.7%12.1%9.1%5.8%3.8%1.2%0.1% 195729.3%22.6%16.1%12.0%9.0%5.8%3.7%1.3%0.2% 195829.7%21.9%16.6%11.9%8.9%5.8%3.7%1.3%0.2% 195930.3%21.2%16.9%11.8%8.7%5.8%3.7%1.4%0.2% 196030.8%20.6%17.2%11.7%8.6%5.9%3.6%1.4%0.2% 196131.4%20.1%17.3%11.6%8.6%5.9%3.5%1.5%0.2% 196231.9%19.8%17.3%11.5%8.5%5.9%3.5%1.5%0.2% 196332.1%19.8%17.1%11.4%8.5%5.9%3.4%1.6%0.2% 196432.2%20.0%16.7%11.5%8.5%5.9%3.3%1.6%0.2% 196531.9%20.6%16.3%11.7%8.4%5.9%3.3%1.6%0.3% 196631.4%21.3%16.0%11.9%8.4%5.9%3.3%1.5%0.3% 196730.9%21.8%15.8%12.1%8.3%5.9%3.4%1.5%0.3% 196830.2%22.4%15.6%12.3%8.4%5.9%3.4%1.6%0.3% 196929.3%23.1%15.5%12.5%8.4%5.8%3.5%1.6%0.3% 197028.5%23.8%15.4%12.6%8.5%5.8%3.5%1.6%0.3% 197127.7%24.4%15.2%12.7%8.5%5.8%3.5%1.6%0.4% 197227.1%24.7%15.2%12.9%8.6%5.9%3.5%1.6%0.4% 197326.5%25.0%15.3%13.0%8.7%6.0%3.5%1.6%0.4% 197426.0%25.0%15.6%12.9%8.9%6.0%3.5%1.6%0.4% 197525.4%24.9%16.1%12.7%9.1%6.1%3.5%1.6%0.5% 197624.8%24.7%16.6%12.6%9.4%6.2%3.6%1.7%0.5% 197724.3%24.5%17.0%12.6%9.6%6.2%3.7%1.7%0.5% 197823.7%24.1%17.6%12.6%9.9%6.3%3.7%1.7%0.5% 197923.0%23.6%18.4%12.6%10.1%6.4%3.8%1.7%0.5% 198022.2%23.3%19.1%12.6%10.3%6.5%3.8%1.7%0.5% 198121.5%23.0%19.7%12.6%10.5%6.5%3.9%1.8%0.5% 198220.9%22.8%20.2%12.7%10.6%6.6%4.0%1.8%0.5% 198320.2%22.5%20.6%12.8%10.7%6.7%4.0%1.9%0.5% 198419.7%22.1%20.9%13.2%10.6%6.9%4.1%1.9%0.5% 198519.1%21.8%21.0%13.8%10.5%7.1%4.2%2.0%0.5% 198618.6%21.5%20.8%14.4%10.5%7.4%4.3%2.0%0.5% 198718.2%21.1%20.7%14.9%10.6%7.6%4.3%2.1%0.6% 198817.7%20.6%20.6%15.4%10.6%7.8%4.4%2.1%0.6% 198917.3%20.0%20.6%16.1%10.7%8.0%4.5%2.2%0.6% 199016.7%19.5%20.5%16.9%10.7%8.2%4.6%2.2%0.6% 199116.0%19.2%20.3%17.6%10.8%8.4%4.8%2.3%0.7% 199215.4%18.8%20.0%18.2%10.9%8.7%4.9%2.4%0.7% 199315.0%18.4%19.8%18.6%11.2%8.8%5.1%2.5%0.7% 199414.8%17.8%19.6%18.9%11.5%8.9%5.3%2.6%0.8% 199514.7%17.2%19.4%18.9%12.1%8.8%5.5%2.7%0.8% 199614.6%16.7%19.1%18.8%12.6%8.8%5.8%2.7%0.9% 199714.6%16.3%18.7%18.7%13.1%8.9%6.0%2.8%0.9% 199814.6%15.9%18.3%18.5%13.6%9.1%6.3%2.9%0.9% 199914.5%15.4%17.9%18.3%14.2%9.2%6.5%3.1%1.0% 200014.3%14.9%17.7%18.2%14.8%9.2%6.7%3.2%1.0% 200114.1%14.4%17.5%18.0%15.5%9.3%6.9%3.3%1.1% 200213.7%14.0%17.1%18.0%16.0%9.4%7.2%3.5%1.1% 200313.1%13.9%16.8%17.8%16.5%9.7%7.3%3.7%1.2% 200412.6%13.8%16.4%17.7%16.8%10.0%7.4%3.9%1.3% 200512.0%13.8%16.1%17.6%17.0%10.6%7.5%4.1%1.4% 200611.4%13.9%15.8%17.4%17.0%11.1%7.5%4.4%1.5% 200710.9%13.9%15.4%17.2%17.1%11.6%7.7%4.6%1.6% 200810.4%13.9%15.0%17.0%17.1%12.1%7.9%4.9%1.7% 200910.0%13.9%14.6%16.7%17.1%12.7%8.0%5.1%1.8% 20109.7%13.8%14.2%16.5%17.1%13.3%8.1%5.3%1.9% 20119.5%13.5%13.9%16.2%17.1%14.0%8.3%5.5%2.1% 20129.2%13.0%13.7%16.0%17.1%14.6%8.5%5.7%2.2% 20139.1%12.4%13.5%15.8%17.1%15.2%8.7%5.9%2.4% 20149.0%11.8%13.3%15.5%17.1%15.7%9.0%6.0%2.5% 20158.9%11.2%13.3%15.2%17.1%16.0%9.5%6.1%2.7% 20168.8%10.7%13.3%15.0%16.9%16.2%10.1%6.2%2.9% 20178.6%10.3%13.4%14.7%16.7%16.3%10.6%6.3%3.1% 20188.3%9.9%13.5%14.4%16.4%16.4%11.2%6.5%3.3% 20198.1%9.6%13.5%14.1%16.1%16.6%11.7%6.7%3.6% 20207.7%9.3%13.5%13.8%15.9%16.6%12.5%6.9%3.8% 20217.4%9.0%13.4%13.5%15.8%16.5%13.3%7.1%4.0% 20226.9%8.9%13.1%13.3%15.6%16.6%14.0%7.2%4.3% 20236.5%8.9%12.7%13.3%15.5%16.6%14.5%7.5%4.5% 20246.1%8.9%12.3%13.3%15.2%16.7%14.9%7.8%4.7% 20255.8%8.9%11.9%13.4%14.9%16.7%15.2%8.3%4.9% 20265.5%8.9%11.5%13.5%14.7%16.6%15.4%8.9%5.1% 20275.3%8.7%11.2%13.6%14.5%16.4%15.6%9.4%5.3% 20285.1%8.5%10.9%13.7%14.3%16.2%15.8%9.9%5.5% 20295.0%8.3%10.7%13.7%14.1%16.0%16.0%10.5%5.8% 20305.0%8.0%10.4%13.6%13.8%15.8%16.0%11.2%6.0% 20315.0%7.6%10.3%13.5%13.5%15.7%16.1%12.0%6.2% 20325.0%7.2%10.3%13.2%13.4%15.6%16.2%12.6%6.5% 20335.1%6.8%10.3%12.8%13.3%15.5%16.3%13.1%6.8% 20345.1%6.5%10.3%12.4%13.3%15.3%16.4%13.5%7.2% 20355.1%6.2%10.3%12.0%13.5%15.1%16.5%13.8%7.6% 20365.1%5.8%10.3%11.6%13.6%14.9%16.4%14.1%8.1% 20375.1%5.6%10.2%11.3%13.7%14.8%16.3%14.3%8.7% 20385.1%5.5%10.0%11.0%13.8%14.6%16.1%14.6%9.2% 20395.1%5.4%9.8%10.8%13.9%14.4%16.0%14.8%9.8% 20405.1%5.4%9.5%10.6%13.9%14.2%15.9%15.0%10.5% 20415.1%5.4%9.1%10.5%13.8%13.9%15.9%15.1%11.2% 20425.0%5.4%8.7%10.5%13.5%13.8%15.8%15.3%11.9% 20435.0%5.5%8.3%10.5%13.1%13.8%15.8%15.5%12.5% 20445.0%5.5%8.0%10.5%12.8%13.9%15.6%15.7%13.0% 20455.1%5.6%7.6%10.6%12.4%14.1%15.4%15.8%13.4% 20465.1%5.6%7.3%10.6%12.0%14.3%15.3%15.8%13.9% 20475.1%5.6%7.1%10.5%11.7%14.5%15.3%15.8%14.4% 20485.1%5.6%7.0%10.4%11.5%14.6%15.2%15.7%15.0% 20495.1%5.6%6.9%10.1%11.3%14.7%15.0%15.6%15.5% 20505.1%5.6%6.9%9.9%11.1%14.8%14.8%15.7%16.1% 20515.1%5.6%7.0%9.5%11.0%14.7%14.7%15.7%16.7% 20525.1%5.6%7.0%9.1%11.0%14.5%14.6%15.8%17.2% 20535.1%5.7%7.1%8.7%11.1%14.2%14.6%15.8%17.7% 20545.0%5.7%7.2%8.4%11.2%13.8%14.8%15.7%18.1% 20554.9%5.7%7.3%8.1%11.3%13.5%15.1%15.7%18.5% 20564.9%5.8%7.3%7.8%11.4%13.1%15.4%15.6%18.7% 20574.8%5.8%7.4%7.5%11.4%12.8%15.7%15.6%19.0% 20584.7%5.9%7.4%7.4%11.2%12.6%15.9%15.6%19.2% 20594.6%5.9%7.4%7.4%11.0%12.5%16.1%15.5%19.5% 20604.6%5.9%7.4%7.4%10.8%12.3%16.2%15.4%19.9% 20614.5%5.9%7.5%7.5%10.4%12.2%16.3%15.3%20.4% 20624.5%5.9%7.5%7.6%10.0%12.4%16.0%15.3%20.8% 20634.5%5.9%7.5%7.7%9.6%12.5%15.7%15.5%21.1% 20644.5%5.8%7.6%7.8%9.2%12.6%15.4%15.7%21.4% 20654.5%5.8%7.7%7.9%8.8%12.8%15.0%16.1%21.5% 20664.6%5.7%7.7%8.0%8.5%12.9%14.7%16.4%21.6% 20674.6%5.6%7.8%8.0%8.3%12.9%14.4%16.8%21.7% 20684.7%5.5%7.9%8.1%8.1%12.7%14.2%17.1%21.8% 20694.7%5.4%7.9%8.1%8.1%12.5%14.0%17.3%21.9% 20704.8%5.4%8.0%8.1%8.1%12.2%13.9%17.5%22.1% 20714.8%5.3%8.0%8.2%8.2%11.8%13.8%17.5%22.3% 20724.9%5.3%8.0%8.2%8.3%11.4%14.0%17.3%22.7% 20735.0%5.3%7.9%8.3%8.5%10.9%14.1%17.0%23.1% 20745.0%5.3%7.9%8.3%8.6%10.5%14.3%16.7%23.5% 20755.1%5.3%7.8%8.4%8.7%10.0%14.4%16.3%23.9% 20765.1%5.4%7.7%8.5%8.8%9.7%14.6%15.9%24.3% 20775.2%5.4%7.6%8.6%8.9%9.4%14.6%15.7%24.7% 20785.3%5.5%7.5%8.7%8.9%9.3%14.4%15.5%25.0% 20795.3%5.6%7.4%8.7%9.0%9.2%14.2%15.3%25.3% 20805.4%5.6%7.3%8.8%9.0%9.2%13.9%15.2%25.6% 20815.4%5.7%7.3%8.8%9.1%9.4%13.4%15.1%25.9% 20825.5%5.8%7.2%8.8%9.1%9.5%12.9%15.3%26.0% 20835.5%5.9%7.2%8.7%9.2%9.6%12.4%15.5%26.0% 20845.5%5.9%7.2%8.6%9.3%9.8%11.9%15.7%26.0% 20855.5%6.0%7.3%8.6%9.4%9.9%11.4%15.9%26.0% 20865.6%6.1%7.3%8.4%9.4%10.1%11.0%16.1%26.0% 20875.6%6.1%7.4%8.3%9.5%10.1%10.7%16.1%26.1% 20885.6%6.2%7.5%8.2%9.6%10.2%10.5%15.9%26.2% 20895.5%6.3%7.6%8.1%9.7%10.3%10.5%15.7%26.3% 20905.5%6.3%7.6%8.0%9.8%10.3%10.6%15.4%26.5% 20915.5%6.4%7.7%8.0%9.8%10.4%10.7%14.9%26.7% 20925.5%6.5%7.8%7.9%9.8%10.4%10.9%14.3%26.9% 20935.5%6.5%7.9%7.9%9.7%10.5%11.1%13.7%27.1% 20945.5%6.5%8.0%7.9%9.7%10.6%11.3%13.2%27.3% 20955.5%6.6%8.1%8.0%9.6%10.7%11.4%12.7%27.5% 20965.5%6.6%8.1%8.0%9.4%10.8%11.5%12.3%27.7% 20975.5%6.6%8.2%8.1%9.3%11.0%11.6%11.9%27.8% 20985.5%6.6%8.3%8.2%9.1%11.1%11.7%11.8%27.7% 20995.5%6.5%8.4%8.3%9.0%11.1%11.8%11.7%27.6% 21005.6%6.5%8.5%8.4%8.9%11.2%11.8%11.8%27.3% The shift is stark. In 1960, children aged 0–9 made up over 30% of the population. By 2100, that figure is projected to fall to just 5.5%, while those aged 80 and over surge into double digits. From Youthful Boom to Demographic Bust In the decades following the Korean War, South Korea had a classic population pyramid: a wide base of young people and relatively few elderly citizens. In 1970, nearly 29% of the population was under 10 years old. Fast forward to today, and the structure has inverted. Persistently low fertility—frequently cited as the lowest in the world—has led to a shrinking base of young people. This trend is frequently described as a “demographic meltdown,” driven by high housing costs, intense education pressures, and shifting social norms. An Economy Growing Older By 2050, people aged 60 and older are projected to account for roughly 40% of the population. The 80–89 and 90+ cohorts grow especially quickly in the second half of the century. This has major economic implications. A smaller working-age population must support a rapidly expanding elderly population, pushing up the old-age dependency ratio. As we’ve explored in our breakdown of the top economies by old-age dependency, countries with aging populations face rising pension and healthcare burdens, as well as slower potential growth. Labor shortages, fiscal strain, and intergenerational inequality are likely to intensify unless offset by higher productivity, immigration, or policy reform. A Small Baby Bump: A Turning Point? After years of record-low fertility, South Korea has recently seen a modest increase in births. While still far below replacement level, even a small shift is notable after such a prolonged decline. Whether this “baby bump” signals a sustained recovery or merely a temporary fluctuation remains to be seen. For now, long-term projections continue to point toward a much older, and smaller, South Korea by the end of the century.

Published 26 minutes ago on February 20, 2026 By Julia Wendling Graphics & Design Athul Alexander Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Email Mapped: The U.S. Cities at Risk of Sinking     Key Takeaways 25 out of the top 28 major U.S. cities are experiencing land subsidence, creating hidden but growing property risk.        Houston, Fort Worth, Dallas, New York, and Chicago are all sinking at a rate of over 2 mm per year.        Even slow, millimeter scale sinking can drive long term infrastructure damage and insurability challenges.        Across the United States, the ground beneath many major cities is gradually subsiding. Research published in Nature Cities shows that 25 of the 28 largest U.S. urban areas are sinking, a trend with serious implications for infrastructure durability, flood risk, and long-term resilience. Created in partnership with Inigo, this visualization maps the major U.S. cities most at risk of sinking. Why U.S. Cities Are Slowly Sinking In coastal cities such as San Diego and New York, subsidence amplifies sea level rise and leaves communities more exposed to storm surge and tidal flooding. Inland cities face different pressures. In places like Houston, Phoenix, and Denver, groundwater extraction and soil compaction accelerate vertical land movement. Because subsidence happens gradually, it often goes unnoticed. Still, Houston, Fort Worth, Dallas, New York, and Chicago are all sinking by more than 2.0 mm per year. Even small drops in elevation can strain pipelines, damage roads, and weaken building foundations. CityStateVertical land movement (mm/year) HoustonTexas-5.2 Fort WorthTexas-4.4 DallasTexas-3.8 New YorkNew York-2.4 ChicagoIllinois-2.3 ColumbusOhio-1.9 SeattleWashington-1.8 DetroitMichigan-1.7 DenverColorado-1.7 CharlotteNorth Carolina-1.5 IndianapolisIndiana-1.4 WashingtonDistrict of Columbia-1.3 Oklahoma CityOklahoma-1.3 NashvilleTennessee-1.1 San AntonioTexas-1.1 San DiegoCalifornia-1.1 PortlandOregon-0.9 San FranciscoCalifornia-0.9 PhoenixArizona-0.8 Las VegasNevada-0.8 AustinTexas-0.8 El PasoTexas-0.8 PhiladelphiaPennsylvania-0.7 Los AngelesCalifornia-0.7 BostonMassachusetts-0.5 Many other major cities, including Seattle, Detroit, and Denver, are sinking at rates between 1.5 and 2.0 mm per year. A Growing Blind Spot in Property Risk Although subtle, subsidence affects millions of people and tens of thousands of buildings, many of which sit in high damage risk zones. As elevation changes accumulate, mitigation and adaptation costs rise, often after damage has already occurred. For property risk professionals, this data highlights an important reality. Climate risk does not move in only one direction. In some cities, the threat is not just rising water levels, but the ground itself sinking beneath critical infrastructure and assets. Explore the data behind emerging global property risks. You may also like Real Estate19 hours ago Charted: The Escalating Destruction of U.S. Wildfires Wildfires in the United States are becoming more destructive, with many of the most severe seasons occurring in the past decade. Real Estate2 days ago Mapped: The U.S. States Building the Most Homes in the Fire Line As housing spreads into the fire line, exposure is rising sharply, compounding loss potential and challenging long-term insurability. Real Estate3 days ago 4 Inputs Driving the Rising Cost of Rebuilding Rising labor and material costs mean every insured dollar now rebuilds less, widening the recovery gap after disasters across the United States. Real Estate6 days ago How Do Interest Rates Impact the Real Estate Market? Lower interest rates have often supported stronger real estate returns and improved valuations. Will that trend return in 2026? Real Estate1 week ago 6 Trends Reshaping U.S. Property Insurance From climate volatility to economic and technological shifts, a wide range of forces are reshaping property risk in the U.S. Environment4 months ago Ranked: The 10 Most Powerful U.S. Hurricanes (1900-2025) Hurricanes are a defining force in the U.S. climate, capable of leaving behind profound environmental, social, and economic devastation. Environment5 months ago Mapped: Which U.S. Cities Saw Record-Breaking Temperatures in 2024? Global temperatures are climbing—but how is this trend playing out across the United States, and which regions are being hit the hardest? Environment6 months ago Ranked: The Most Expensive U.S. Wildfire Events, So Far Wildfire events are growing increasingly frequent and destructive around the world as human-driven climate impacts continue to escalate. Environment6 months ago Mapped: The United States of Drought Drought grips much of the U.S., affecting over 60 million people today. Healthcare7 months ago The $58B Weight Loss Drug Market in One Chart Weight loss drugs have surged in popularity in recent years, transforming the pharmaceutical landscape. Which brands are dominating this space? Healthcare7 months ago Ranked: Which Areas Receive the Most Pharma R&D? The pharmaceutical industry has made enormous strides in treating—and even curing—a wide range of diseases and conditions. Which areas are seeing the most R&D in 2025? Healthcare7 months ago The $5.6T Pharmaceutical Industry in One Chart Pharma giants don’t just make medicine—they shape the future of healthcare. Who are the world’s major players? Crime7 months ago 6 Fraud Trends Reshaping Risk in 2025 The fraud and financial crime landscapes are evolving rapidly. What are the key threats shaping risk in 2025? Cryptocurrency7 months ago Ranked: The 10 Biggest Digital Heists Some of the largest digital heists didn’t rely on brute-force hacking, they exploited the weakest link in security: human trust. Crime8 months ago The Most Costly Financial Crimes in 2024 As cybersecurity threats escalate, which financial crimes are causing the most harm? The FBI has the data. Crime8 months ago Mapped: U.S. Financial Crime Activity by State Suspicious activity has been rising in the U.S., but is it spread evenly throughout all 50 states? Certainly not. Crime8 months ago Ranked: America’s Most Common Financial Crimes As technology and AI become more widespread, fraud and other suspicious activity are rising across America. Which types are the most common? Economy8 months ago Tracking the $3.1 Trillion Financial Crime Pandemic From money laundering to fraud, financial crime acts as a drain on the economy, totaling an incredible $3.1 trillion. Politics9 months ago Which Types of Government Rule the World? Over half the global population is ruled by non-centrist types of government, including autocracies and left or right wing parties. Politics9 months ago Breaking Down the $524 Billion Investment Needed to Rebuild Ukraine Ukraine will require an estimated $524B over the next decade to recover from the Russia-Ukraine war. Which sectors have been most impacted? Politics9 months ago Are Tariffs Causing U.S. Inflation Fears? Amid tariff increases, consumers’ expectations for U.S. inflation in the next five years have reached their highest level since March 1991. Politics10 months ago Ranked: Executive Orders by President in the First 100 Days In his first 100 days, President Trump has issued far more executive orders than any other president in history. Subscribe Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join 375,000+ email subscribers: *Sign Up

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The Companies Holding the Most Cash in the World See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Financials dominate the list—13 of the top 50 are financial services firms. Berkshire Hathaway is the clear outlier, sitting on a record $382B, the largest cash position in its history—more than Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon combined. The cash that companies hold is important for paying employees, funding operations, and as a measure of financial health. This chart shows the 50 companies with the largest cash holdings, using data from TradingView to highlight who is sitting on the largest war chests. This metric captures a company’s most liquid assets: cash plus short-term securities like T-bills that typically mature within a year. Which Companies Hold the Most Cash? Berkshire Hathaway leads the rankings with an impressive $382 billion. The data table below shows the top 50 companies worldwide with the largest cash and short-term securities holdings: RankCompanyCash and short-term investments holdings (billions) 1Berkshire Hathaway$381.7 2CITIC Limited$171.5 3Daiwa Securities Group$131.4 4Alphabet$126.8 5Amazon$126.3 6Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing$97.8 7Interactive Brokers Group$93.4 8Microsoft$89.5 9Charles Schwab$88.9 10Meta Platforms$82.4 11Volkswagen$76.9 12PDD Holdings$69.5 13Apple$66.9 14NVIDIA$60.6 15Tencent$59.2 16Alibaba Group Holding$58.2 17Saudi Aramco$56.0 18Contemporary Amperex Technology$51.6 19Toyota Motor$50.5 20SBI Holdings$50.0 21China State Construction Engineering$48.5 22American Express$47.8 23SoftBank Group$45.8 24Tesla$44.5 25China Mobile$43.8 26Daou Technology$43.7 27Hon Hai Precision Industry$42.5 28CNPC Capital$41.9 29Japan Securities Finance$41.0 30PetroChina$40.7 31Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing$39.4 32Fannie Mae$39.4 33Stellantis$38.7 34Ford Motor$38.5 35International Holding Company$37.6 36Intel$37.4 37BP$36.8 38Rakuten Group$36.0 39CNOOC$35.8 40Nomura Holdings$35.7 41SAIC Motor$35.1 42Honda Motor$30.9 43Deutsche Boerse$30.6 44General Motors$30.6 45Shell$30.3 46JD.com$29.6 47Boeing$29.4 48China Railway Group$28.6 49TotalEnergies$28.3 50Daou Data$26.8 Source: TradingView | Cash and Short-Term Investments | as of Feb 11, 2026 Following Berkshire are CITIC—a Chinese state-backed financial conglomerate—and Daiwa Securities Group, one of Japan’s biggest financial brokerages. Big Tech rounds out the top five, with Alphabet holding $127 billion and Amazon holding $126 billion. Why Buffett Holds So Much Cash Among the top 50 companies, the Financials sector collectively holds the largest cash reserves at $1.2 trillion—partially driven by strict capital rules requiring banks to maintain large liquid buffers. Berkshire Hathaway is different: its cash position is strategic, not regulatory. After 12 straight quarters as a net seller of stocks, Buffett and the team have parked much of the company’s liquidity in short-term U.S. Treasury bills, implying that equity valuations look expensive. The Oracle’s cash and cash equivalents as a percentage of total assets is at an all-time high—roughly 31% of total assets. Historically, this has coincided with periods when he waits for a major economic or market dislocation before deploying capital as prices begin to mean-revert—quietly accumulating dry powder in the meantime. Why Big Tech Holds So Much Cash The Magnificent Seven: Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia and Tesla collectively hold $597 billion—enough to buy most S&P 500 companies. Traditionally, Big Tech companies are massive cash machines: high gross margins and scalable cost structures mean incremental revenue converts into cash quickly. Despite spending heavily to build AI factories, they’ve used little of their cash reserves to finance them—opting instead for debt. They hold large cash stockpiles both to fund acquisitions and guard against potential economic turmoil, such as threats from tariffs or geopolitical conflicts. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about the world’s largest companies, check out this graphic on Voronoi.