Editorial

newsfeed

We have compiled a pre-selection of editorial content for you, provided by media companies, publishers, stock exchange services and financial blogs. Here you can get a quick overview of the topics that are of public interest at the moment.
360o
Share this page
News from the economy, politics and the financial markets
In this section of our news section we provide you with editorial content from leading publishers.

Latest news

Mapped: Where Americans 65+ Are Still Working

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: Where Americans 65+ Are Still Working See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Nearly 1 in 4 Americans over 65 is still working, often part-time Vermont and New Hampshire (28.6%) have the highest share of senior workers West Virginia (16.7%) has the lowest participation among retirement-age Americans For a growing share of Americans, retirement no longer starts at 65. This map shows where people aged 65 and older are still working across U.S. states, based on 2024 data from the U.S. Census Bureau via FinanceBuzz. About 22% of Americans 65+ remain in the workforce, but the share climbs to nearly one-third in some states. The gap highlights how cost of living, job availability, and shifting retirement systems are reshaping when—and whether—Americans stop working. The Workforces With The Most Seniors The New England states of Vermont and New Hampshire (both 28.6%) lead the country in the number of seniors still working, followed by South Dakota at 27.6%. This data table highlights the percentage of retirement-age people still in the workforce per state. StatePeople Over 65 Still Working (%) New Hampshire28.6% Vermont28.6% South Dakota27.6% Massachusetts27.2% Maryland26.8% New Jersey26.8% Connecticut26.5% Nebraska26.1% North Dakota25.7% Hawaii25.6% Alaska25.5% Maine24.8% Montana24.6% Colorado24.5% Kansas24.5% Rhode Island24.5% North Carolina24.0% Virginia24.0% Texas23.8% Iowa23.7% Minnesota23.5% Utah23.5% New York23.0% Illinois22.8% California22.7% Indiana22.2% Wyoming22.2% Pennsylvania22.0% Tennessee21.8% Georgia21.7% Delaware21.5% Nevada21.5% Ohio21.5% Missouri21.4% Wisconsin21.4% Louisiana21.1% Oklahoma21.1% Washington20.9% Idaho20.5% New Mexico20.5% Florida20.1% Michigan20.1% Kentucky19.9% South Carolina19.9% Mississippi19.6% Alabama19.2% Arizona19.2% Oregon19.1% Arkansas18.9% West Virginia16.7% U.S. Average22.4% A clear regional pattern emerges: Northeastern states dominate the top ranks, with many posting rates above 26%. Higher living costs and longer life expectancy likely contribute to more Americans 65+ staying in the workforce. Most people are not working full-time, however. In fact, among its retirement-age workers, Vermont has the highest concentration of part-time employees nationwide, reflecting in part the social role work plays in many older Americans’ lives. The Two Full-Time States On the flip side, there’s Maryland, which has the highest share of full-time retirement-age workers in the country. Maryland and Hawaii are actually the only two states in which a majority of working people aged 65 and up are employed full-time. Full-time work is generally essential for seniors who cannot rely on other retirement sources of income, such as Social Security, or who obtain needed benefits through their job. The decline of traditional pensions is a key driver behind this shift. With retirement savings increasingly tied to 401(k) plans and market performance, many Americans are working longer to maintain financial security. West Virginia and the Truly Retired Among the 50 states in the country, West Virginia (16.7%) has the lowest share of retirement-age workers. It’s followed by Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, and Oregon, all of which sit around 19%. In lower-ranking states like West Virginia and Arkansas, fewer Americans 65+ remain in the workforce—likely reflecting a mix of fewer job opportunities and lower living costs. In these areas, retirement may still be more attainable than continuing to work. They may also have differing lifestyle preferences, electing to devote more time to family commitments than to the structure or social component of a job or so-called “side hustle.” Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapping Unemployment Claims per 100,000 Workers on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Read More

Ranked: The World’s Richest Music Artists

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The World’s Richest Music Artists See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Jay-Z leads all musicians with a $2.8B fortune—ahead of Taylor Swift. Seven music artists are now billionaires, led by business-driven empires. Most top earners built billion-dollar businesses beyond music. The music industry’s biggest stars are no longer just performers. Many are building billion-dollar business empires. This ranking shows the 10 wealthiest musicians globally, led by Jay-Z with an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion—putting him ahead of Taylor Swift, whose fortune is largely driven by touring and music ownership. While fans may assume chart success equals wealth, today’s richest artists have built empires far beyond music, from liquor brands to cosmetics companies. Data is sourced from the Forbes Real-Time Billionaires List as of 2026. Brooklyn’s Representation At The Top No musical artist has accumulated more wealth than Jay-Z, whose net worth has reached $2.8 billion. Born Shawn Carter in December of 1969 in Brooklyn, New York, the 56-year old rapper and music mogul’s career has spanned 30 years, beginning with his 1996 debut album Reasonable Doubt, in which he told tales of his criminal past. In 2019, Jay-Z became hip hop’s first billionaire. Here are the 10 richest music artists in the world as of March 2026: RankArtistNet Worth 1 Jay-Z$2.8B 2 Taylor Swift$2B 3 Bruce Springsteen$1.2B 4 Beyonce$1B 5 Rihanna$1B 6 Dr. Dre$1B 7 Jimmy Buffett (and estate)$1B 8 Madonna$850M 9 Selena Gomez$700M 10 Celine Dion$570M Taylor Swift ranks second with $2 billion, driven largely by touring and music. Jay-Z’s lead comes from business ventures and investments. The secret to Jay-Z’s success comes from how he has leveraged his successful music career to pursue other business ventures outside of music. Until 2013, he owned a small minority stake in the Brooklyn Nets (formerly New Jersey Nets) basketball team, as well as their home stadium, the Barclays Center. In the early 2020s, he sold larger stakes in liquor brands such as Ace of Spades and D’usse to major companies like LVMH and Bacardi. Today Jay-Z has gone beyond the label of “greatest rapper alive” to become the wealthiest music icon in the world, as well as an enduring figure in pop culture. His entertainment company Roc Nation manages musical artists and athletes, and has produced the Super Bowl Halftime Show since 2019. The Billionaires’ Club of Music Jay-Z is not the only person to go from music star to billionaire. In fact, aside from the late Jimmy Buffett he’s joined by six others, including Taylor Swift ($2 billion) and Bruce Springsteen ($1.2 billion), as well as Beyoncé, Rihanna, and Dr. Dre (all $1 billion). Many of these other billionaires have also leveraged their music to pursue entrepreneurial outlets. For example, while Dr. Dre is perhaps most famous for launching the careers of successful rappers like Eminem and Kendrick Lamar, his biggest financial success stemmed from the $3 billion acquisition by Apple of his Beats Entertainment company in 2014. And then there’s Rihanna. The Barbadian singer, who has more Diamond-certified singles than any other artist worldwide, has over the last decade turned away from music to instead build the Fenty Beauty cosmetics brand, a multibillion-dollar empire which doubled its revenue in 2022. This cosmetics angle has been lucrative elsewhere: American singer Selena Gomez launched her $1.3 billion makeup brand, Rare Beauty, in 2020, contributing to her own $700 million net worth. Taylor Swift and the Rise of Swiftonomics Unlike her billionaire peers on this list, Taylor Swift became a billionaire in October 2023 owing primarily to the value of her music catalog and the runaway success of her most recent stadium tour, The Eras Tour. Per Forbes, Swift is the first musician to become a billionaire primarily based on her songs and live performances. Her multibillion-dollar net worth stems in part from over $800 million from royalties and touring, a 12-album, $600 million musical catalog, and over $110 million in real estate holdings. The Eras Tour smashed global records upon launch and in the years since, running from March 2023 to November 2024 and grossing over $2 billion at the box office, making it the highest-grossing tour in world history. Over 10 million fans attended the 149-show tour across Europe, Asia, and the Americas, while the U.S. leg of the tour reportedly added over $4 billion to the national gross domestic product in what has been dubbed “Swiftonomics.” Margaritaville Forever Nine of these musicians are still alive, while Jimmy Buffett passed away at age 76 in September 2023 as a billionaire. Buffett was famous for his 1977 classic song “Margaritaville,” as well as the multimedia empire it spawned, which at the time of his death had grown from t-shirts and merchandise to full restaurants and resorts. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Taylor Swift Remains the Queen of Spotify on Voronoi.

Read More

Ranked: The 20 Tallest Buildings in the World

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The 20 Tallest Buildings in the World See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Burj Khalifa remains the world’s tallest building at 2,717 feet, nearly 500 feet taller than runner-up Merdeka 118. 17 of the world’s 20 tallest buildings are in Asia, led by China and Malaysia. New York’s One World Trade Center is the only U.S. building in the global top 10. The race to build higher has produced some of the most recognizable skylines on Earth, but one tower still stands far above the rest. At 2,717 feet, Dubai’s Burj Khalifa remains nearly 500 feet taller than the second-place building. This graphic ranks the 20 tallest buildings in the world as of April 2026, using data from the Council on Vertical Urbanism (formerly known Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat). Heights include architectural features such as spires, but exclude changeable additions like antennae and flagpoles. The Tallest Building in the World Dubai’s Burj Khalifa has held the title of world’s tallest building since 2010, and it still leads by a remarkable margin. At 2,717 feet, it stands nearly 500 feet taller than second-place Merdeka 118 in Kuala Lumpur, underscoring how far ahead it remains even as new supertall towers continue to rise. The table below shows the 20 tallest buildings in the world as of April 2026, highlighting just how concentrated these megatall towers are in Asia. RankBuildingCityHeight (feet) 1Burj Khalifa Dubai2,717 2Merdeka 118 Kuala Lumpur2,227 3Shanghai Tower Shanghai2,073 4Makkah Royal Clock Tower Mecca1,972 5Ping An Finance Center Shenzhen1,965 6Lotte World Tower Seoul1,819 7One World Trade Center New York City1,776 8Guangzhou CTF Finance Centre Guangzhou1,739 8Tianjin CTF Finance Centre Tianjin1,739 10CITIC Tower Beijing1,731 11TAIPEI 101 Taipei1,667 12Shanghai World Financial Center Shanghai1,614 13International Commerce Centre Hong Kong1,588 14Wuhan Greenland Center Wuhan1,560 15Central Park Tower New York City1,550 16Lakhta Center St. Petersburg1,516 17Vincom Landmark 81 Ho Chi Minh City1,513 18The Exchange 106 Kuala Lumpur1,488 19Changsha IFS Tower T1 Changsha1,483 19Petronas Twin Tower 1 Kuala Lumpur1,483 19Petronas Twin Tower 2 Kuala Lumpur1,483 The Burj Khalifa is not alone in the Middle East. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower, located in the Saudi religious city of Mecca, stands at 1,972 feet tall and is thus the fourth-tallest building in the world. In fact, Saudi Arabia is eager to replace the Burj Khalifa at the top of the leaderboard. The Gulf monarchy has been building the Jeddah Tower on and off since 2013, with the aims of having it opened by early 2028. This one-kilometer-tall tower, to be built in the western port city of the same name, will be upon completion the tallest building in the world. Asia’s Dominance Since the 1990s Asia has led the global skyscraper race for decades. A major turning point came in 1998, when Kuala Lumpur’s Petronas Twin Towers (1,483 feet) overtook Chicago’s Sears Tower and shifted the title of world’s tallest building to Asia. Malaysia has seen two taller buildings open in the years since, joined by Asian peers like South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. But none can compare to China, which today has more skyscrapers than the next 11 countries combined. Including the International Commerce Centre (1,588 feet) in Hong Kong, China houses nearly half of the world’s top 20 buildings. Built in 2015, the Shanghai Tower (2,073 feet) is China’s tallest building and the third-tallest building worldwide. Since 2021, it’s been home to the world’s highest luxury hotel above ground level, the J Hotel Shanghai Tower. Tallest Non-Asian Skyscrapers Around the World Only three of the world’s top 20 tallest buildings are located outside of Asia, with two of these in New York and one in the Russian city of St. Petersburg. One World Trade Center, locally nicknamed the Freedom Tower owing to its association with the September 11th attacks which destroyed its predecessors, stands as the tallest building in the Western Hemisphere at 1,776 feet tall, its height an allusion to the year of the U.S. Declaration of Independence. Also in New York is the Central Park Tower, the tallest residential building in the world at 1,550 feet. Meanwhile, the Lakhta Center in St. Petersburg, at 1,516 feet, is Europe’s tallest building. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Tallest Buildings in 2024 on Voronoi.

Read More

Mapped: Where Young Adults Live With Their Parents Most

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: Where Young Adults Live With Their Parents Most See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways One in three U.S. adults (ages 18–34) now live with their parents. The share ranges from 44.1% in New Jersey to just 12.3% in North Dakota, revealing a wide geographic divide. High-cost coastal and Northeastern states dominate the top of the ranking. For many young Americans, moving out is becoming harder to afford. This map shows the share of 18–34-year-olds living with their parents in each U.S. state, using rounded 2025 U.S. Census Bureau data via FinanceBuzz. Nationally, the figure now stands at 33%, meaning one in three young adults still live at home. That is slightly below the 2020 pandemic peak, but still far above historical norms and a sign of how sharply housing costs have reshaped the path to independence. Ranked: States Where the Most Young Adults Live at Home New Jersey leads the country by a wide margin, with 44.1% of young adults living with their parents, followed by Connecticut (41.3%). Several other high-cost states—including California and Maryland—also approach or exceed 38%. The pattern is clear: states with higher housing costs and tighter supply consistently rank at the top. In these markets, renting or buying is significantly less attainable for young adults, increasing the likelihood of living at home. The following data table reflects the percentage of young adults living with their parents in each U.S. state. RankStateYoung adults living with parents (%) 1New Jersey44.1% 2Connecticut41.3% 3California39.1% 4Maryland38.5% 5Delaware37.0% 6Florida36.6% 7New Hampshire36.5% 8New York35.9% 9Massachusetts35.7% 10Illinois35.1% 10Nevada35.1% 12Pennsylvania34.7% 13Georgia34.4% 14Rhode Island33.8% 15Hawaii33.3% 16New Mexico33.2% 16Texas33.2% 18Mississippi33.0% 19Michigan32.5% 20Virginia32.0% 21Alabama31.8% 22Arizona30.7% 23Louisiana30.2% 24South Carolina29.6% 25Ohio28.5% 26Indiana28.4% 27North Carolina28.3% 27West Virginia28.3% 29Tennessee27.5% 30Minnesota27.1% 31Utah26.8% 31Washington26.8% 33Missouri26.6% 34Kentucky26.5% 35Vermont26.4% 36Alaska26.2% 36Maine26.2% 36Oregon26.2% 39Oklahoma26.1% 40Idaho25.4% 41Arkansas25.3% 41Wisconsin25.3% 41Kansas23.3% 41Montana23.3% 45Colorado22.8% 46Iowa21.6% 47Nebraska20.4% 48South Dakota17.7% 49Wyoming16.2% 50District of Columbia13.3% 51North Dakota12.3% -- U.S. Average33.0% This geographic divide mirrors housing costs: high-cost Northeastern and coastal states consistently rank at the top, while more affordable states fall to the bottom. The States With the Most Independent Young Adults At the other end of the spectrum, lower-cost states show dramatically lower rates of co-residence. In North Dakota (12.3%), the share is nearly one-quarter of New Jersey’s, highlighting how affordability shapes independence.  Washington, D.C. stands out as an outlier, with just 13.3% of young adults living with their parents. This likely reflects the influx of young professionals who relocate to work in the capital. By and large, however, the states with the lowest rates of “full nesters” are more affordable states like South Dakota (18%) and Nebraska (20%). Nationwide Shifts: A Timeline Since 1960 Young adults may stay with their parents while studying, which would help to explain higher rates in leading educational centers like California or Maryland (both 39%). However, the increase seen at the national level in recent decades reflects a changing economic reality for young adults. In 1960, less than a quarter of young adults lived with their parents. This rate increased to 30% by 2010, following the outbreak of the 2008 financial crisis, and peaked at over a third in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even after the pandemic, rates remain historically elevated—suggesting this is no longer a temporary shift, but a structural one. Rising housing costs continue to delay independence, and the data shows young men are more likely than young women to live with their parents. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out U.S. Wages Haven’t Kept Up With Inflation on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Read More

The Cost of Everyday Things in China vs. India

The Cost of Everyday Things in China vs. India This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Many everyday items—from transit to meals—cost under $3 in both countries. India is cheaper across most categories, especially rent and groceries. China’s higher wages help offset its higher prices. How far does a few dollars go in China and India? This graphic compares everyday prices across the world’s two most populous countries, from a $0.30 transit ticket to a $2–$3 restaurant meal. While India is consistently cheaper across most categories, China’s significantly higher wages change how affordable these prices feel in practice. The data, compiled by Numbeo and visualized by Julie Peasley, shows how prices and income together shape everyday cost of living. China vs. India: How Everyday Prices Compare At a glance, India is cheaper across nearly every category, from rent to groceries. However, China’s higher wages help offset its elevated costs, making some goods similarly affordable when adjusted for income. ItemChina Cost ($USD)India Cost ($USD) New Compact Car18,90312,933 Monthly Rent, 1-bedroom in city center405151 Monthly Basic Utilities52.4838.73 Monthly Mobile Phone Plan8.743.64 Monthly Fitness Club Membership41.2514.75 Meal at an Inexpensive Restaurant2.912.16 Bottle of Wine (Mid-Range)11.647.62 Movie Ticket (International Release)6.553.23 Combo Meal McDonald’s5.093.77 Pack of Cigarettes3.643.77 Pint of Beer (Domestic Draft)1.021.89 Cappuccino (Regular size)1.742.95 Dozen Eggs1.590.91 Milk (1 gallon)6.862.5 Gasoline (1 gallon)4.324.17 White Rice (1 lb)0.430.3 Local Transport 1-Way Ticket0.290.27 Soft Drink (Coca-Cola or Pepsi, 12 oz)0.480.41 Bottled Water (12 oz)0.280.16 Monthly Broadband Internet11.027.26 Income Sets the Baseline Prices only tell part of the story. In China, the average monthly salary (after tax) is roughly $1,054, compared to about $444 in India. This gap helps explain why higher prices in China don’t necessarily mean lower affordability. When adjusted for income, some goods can feel just as accessible, or even more affordable, than in India. Everyday Essentials: Food, Transport, and Utilities The biggest price differences show up in daily essentials, where India is consistently cheaper. For example: A dozen eggs costs about $1.59 in China versus $0.91 in India A meal at an inexpensive restaurant is roughly $2.91 in China and $2.16 in India Transportation costs are relatively close, with local transit tickets costing under $0.30 in both countries. Utilities and internet also remain affordable in both markets, though still cheaper in India overall. Big-Ticket Items and Global Pricing For larger purchases like cars or electronics, the price gap narrows. A new compact car costs around $18,903 in China versus $12,933 in India, reflecting global supply chains and standardized manufacturing costs. Similarly, items like smartphones or broadband plans don’t diverge as much as food or rent, suggesting that globalized goods are less sensitive to local economic differences. A Note on Comparisons While these figures provide a useful benchmark, not all listed goods reflect typical consumption habits in either country. Instead, they act as standardized reference points for comparing cost structures globally, similar to broader analyses like this global cost of living index. Ultimately, cost of living depends on both prices and income, and this comparison highlights how the balance differs between China and India. Learn More on the Voronoi App For a broader comparison, check out China vs US: The Cost of Everyday Things on the Voronoi app, where you can explore how China stacks up against one of the world’s largest economies.

Read More

Mapped: America’s Most Visited States by Tourists

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Mapped: America’s Most Visited States by Tourists See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Just four states—New York, Florida, California, and Nevada—attract 57% of all international visitors New York leads by a wide margin, with nearly 10 million tourists Illinois is the only Midwestern state to receive over a million foreign visitors in 2024. With rugged, picturesque landscapes and some of the world’s most famous cities, the United States has long been a favorite destination for international travelers. This map highlights the states which received the most visitors from overseas in 2024, excluding arrivals from both Canada and Mexico. It utilizes data from the ITA National Travel and Tourism Office. Setting aside people coming from directly neighboring countries, the U.S. counted 48.9 million international visitors in 2024. The Big Four Tourist Destinations An impressive 57% of all overseas visitors went to just four states: New York (9.8 million), Florida (8.9 million), California (7 million), and Nevada (2.6 million). The following data table ranks U.S. states by the number of overseas visitors they received in 2024. RankState or TerritoryNumber of overseas visitors, 2024 1New York9,802,000 2Florida8,860,000 3California6,954,000 4Nevada2,644,000 5Texas2,088,000 6Hawaii1,976,000 7Massachusetts1,501,000 8Illinois1,410,000 9New Jersey1,227,000 10Arizona1,160,000 11Georgia1,069,000 12Washington858,000 13Pennsylvania805,000 14Guam802,000 15Utah640,000 16Virginia548,000 17Tennessee524,000 18North Carolina510,000 19Colorado461,000 20Maryland425,000 21Michigan418,000 22Louisiana387,000 23Ohio369,000 24Connecticut320,000 25South Carolina299,000 26Minnesota232,000 27Indiana222,000 28Oregon218,000 29Wyoming204,000 30Wisconsin193,000 31Missouri165,000 32Puerto Rico148,000 33Alaska137,000 34Kentucky130,000 35Maine127,000 36Alabama109,000 37Rhode Island105,000 38Idaho95,000 39New Mexico95,000 40New Hampshire81,000 41Oklahoma77,000 42Vermont77,000 43Arkansas74,000 44Iowa67,000 45Kansas63,000 46Montana56,000 47South Dakota53,000 48Mississippi49,000 49Nebraska49,000 50Delaware42,000 51West Virginian/a 52North Dakotan/a --Total48,925,000 New York’s chart-topping position is owed to the state’s namesake city, which is among the most popular international tourist destinations worldwide, as well as the picturesque Niagara Falls which line its border with Canada to the west. California and Florida are both aided by their amusement parks and sprawling cities like Miami and Los Angeles, which remain popular with visitors from around the world. In contrast to much larger states like Texas (2.1 million and Illinois (1.4 million) which depend in large part on Mexican and Canadian tourists respectively, the smaller Mountain West state of Nevada punches above its weight. This is due to the state’s largest city, Las Vegas, which has been a global entertainment and gambling center for decades. Tourist Drought in the Midwest Illinois was the only Midwestern state to receive over a million overseas visitors in 2024. Indeed, the remainder of the region averaged just a few hundred thousand visitors, led by Michigan (418,000) and Ohio (369,000). Despite boasting national parks like Mount Rushmore and the Badlands, states like South Dakota saw just 53,000 visitors in 2024 when excluding arrivals from Canada and Mexico. Distance from the coasts and more popular destinations, plus minimal airport connectivity, help in part to explain these low figures. Nationally, Nebraska ties with Mississippi (both 49,000) as the second-lowest number of overseas visitors received, behind only tiny Delaware (42,000). Hawaii’s Enduring Popularity Hawaii joined the U.S. as a state in 1959, and by the 1960s had already become a popular tourist destination. In 2024, the Aloha State received over 2 million overseas visitors, placing it well ahead of far larger states like Arizona (1.2 million) and Georgia (1.1 million). Visitors are drawn to the state’s stunning natural beauty and unique culture, as well as its geographic location far from the U.S. mainland. In fact, Hawaii is the rare state to have received more international visitors than its entire population of 1.4 million, even as recent years have seen wildfires and natural disasters impacting its tourist economy. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Top Countries Sending Tourists to the U.S. on Voronoi.

Read More

Ranked: The World’s Largest Armies in 2026

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The World’s Largest Armies in 2026 See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Bangladesh ranks #1 globally with over 7 million personnel, driven almost entirely by reserves and paramilitary forces. China has the largest active-duty military, with roughly 2 million troops. Countries like South Korea and Taiwan rely heavily on reserves due to regional security pressures. Military power is often associated with advanced weapons and technology, but sheer manpower still shapes global rankings. This chart reveals the world’s largest armies in 2026 by total personnel—including active troops, reserves, and paramilitary forces. The results are unexpected: countries with relatively small active forces, like Bangladesh and Vietnam, rank at the top due to massive reserve systems. Data comes from GlobalFirepower (March 2026). Definitions of reserve and paramilitary forces vary by country. Reserve Forces Drive the Rankings Bangladesh ranks first globally with 7 million total personnel, despite having just over 200,000 active troops. Its position is driven almost entirely by a vast paramilitary network. RankNationActiveReserve + ParamilitaryTotal 1 Bangladesh204,0006,800,0007,004,000 2 Vietnam450,0005,300,0005,750,000 3 Ukraine900,0004,100,0005,000,000 4 India1,400,0003,500,0004,900,000 5 South Korea450,0003,200,0003,650,000 6 Russia1,300,0002,300,0003,600,000 7 China2,000,0001,100,0003,100,000 8 United States1,300,000800,0002,100,000 9 North Korea1,300,000660,0001,960,000 10 Taiwan230,0001,700,0001,930,000 11 Brazil376,0001,500,0001,876,000 12 Pakistan660,0001,100,0001,760,000 13 Philippines160,0001,500,0001,660,000 14 Colombia429,0001,100,0001,529,000 15 Egypt439,000779,0001,218,000 16 Iran610,000570,0001,180,000 17 Indonesia405,000651,0001,056,000 18 Germany184,000860,0001,044,000 19 Türkiye481,000530,0001,011,000 20 Israel170,000500,000670,000 Vietnam follows a similar model to Bangladesh, combining a moderate active force with one of the largest reserve systems in the world. Ukraine also stands out, reflecting rapid mobilization and expansion following the ongoing conflict with Russia. China Leads in Active Military Strength When focusing only on active-duty personnel, the rankings shift significantly. China leads with roughly 2 million troops, followed by India, Russia, and the United States—all with over 1 million active personnel. This highlights a key distinction: total personnel reflects mobilization capacity, while active forces indicate immediate military readiness. North Korea also ranks high in active personnel, reflecting its long-standing emphasis on military preparedness. Different Strategies Across Regions Military structure varies widely by region. South Korea and Taiwan maintain large reserve forces due to geopolitical tensions, particularly with neighboring rivals. Meanwhile, countries like Brazil and Germany maintain relatively balanced forces, with moderate active troops and sizable reserves. Israel stands out for its highly mobilized reserve system, which can be activated quickly in times of crisis. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out this graphic about global nuclear warhead stockpiles on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Read More

China’s Debt Surpasses Europe for the First Time

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization China’s Debt Surpasses Europe for the First Time See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways China’s government debt reached $18.7T in 2025, surpassing the EU for the first time. U.S. debt climbed to $38.3T, remaining the world’s largest by a wide margin. Since 2008, China’s debt has grown more than twice as fast as the U.S. and far faster than Europe. China’s government debt has surpassed the European Union’s for the first time, marking a major shift in the global debt landscape. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S., China, and Europe have followed very different borrowing paths. While Europe kept debt growth relatively constrained, both the U.S. and China expanded rapidly—especially after 2020. The chart visualizes annual government debt totals for the U.S., EU, and China from 1995 to 2025 in current U.S. dollars (not adjusted for inflation), using data from the IMF. In 2025, China’s government debt reached $18.7 trillion, surpassing the EU’s $17.6 trillion total for the first time. The crossover underscores how rapidly China’s borrowing has scaled over the past two decades. The Rapid Rise in U.S. and China’s Government Debt In 2008, U.S. government debt stood at $10.9 trillion, roughly in line with the EU’s $10.7 trillion total. By 2025, it had surged to $38.3 trillion, leaving the EU behind by $20.7 trillion. The data table below shows the government debt of the U.S., China, and EU from 1995 to 2025 in current U.S. dollars: Year U.S. Government Debt (trillions, USD) EU Government Debt (trillions, USD) China Government Debt (trillions, USD) 19954.95.90.2 19965.26.10.2 19975.45.60.2 19985.55.60.2 19995.65.50.2 20005.64.90.3 20015.74.90.3 20026.15.30.4 20036.86.70.4 20048.17.70.5 20058.680.6 20068.98.30.7 20079.49.21 200810.910.71.2 200912.611.21.8 201014.411.82 201115.613.12.5 201216.912.82.9 201317.713.73.6 201418.5144.2 201519.311.94.6 201620.2125.7 201720.912.46.7 201822.213.17.8 201923.412.58.7 202028.314.110.4 202129.715.512.8 20223114.313.8 202333.315.315 202435.81616.6 202538.317.618.7 From just $1.2 trillion in 2008, China’s government debt grew at roughly 17% annually—fast enough to overtake the EU in less than two decades. Since 2008, U.S. government debt expanded at about 7.7% per year, compared with roughly 3.0% per year for the EU. Why China and U.S. Debt Grew Much Faster than Europe’s While the EU’s slower debt growth partially reflects weaker nominal growth across the bloc compared to the U.S. and China, it also is a symptom of the bloc’s tighter fiscal constraints after Europe’s sovereign debt crisis, which peaked between 2010 and 2012. In contrast, China’s surge in debt was driven by credit expansion, infrastructure spending, and state-backed growth. The U.S., meanwhile, combined crisis-era borrowing with persistent deficits, especially after 2020, allowing debt to scale far beyond Europe’s. With fewer fiscal constraints at the federal level, Washington has maintained higher spending levels—helping explain why U.S. debt now stands far above both China and the EU. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s $111 Trillion in Government Debt on Voronoi.

Read More

Ranked: Which Tech Companies Cut the Most Jobs?

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: Which Tech Companies Cut the Most Jobs? See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Amazon leads all companies with 30,184 disclosed layoffs across 2025 and 2026 to date. Intel (27,058) and Microsoft (15,347) rank second and third, far ahead of the rest. Just three companies account for roughly 64% of all layoffs shown in the ranking. Layoffs in tech are increasingly concentrated among a handful of giant companies. Amazon, Intel, and Microsoft alone dominate this ranking, far outpacing the rest of the industry. While the pace of layoffs has slowed from earlier peaks, companies are still trimming headcount as they balance profitability, slower growth, and increased investment in AI. This visualization ranks the 15 tech companies that have cut the most jobs across 2025 and 2026 as of March 16, based on data from Layoffs.fyi. Amazon Leads With Over 30,000 Layoffs Amazon leads the ranking with 30,184 disclosed layoffs, followed by Intel at 27,058 and Microsoft at 15,347. Together, these three companies account for nearly two-thirds of all layoffs shown. The data table below shows the top 15 companies by disclosed layoffs in 2025 and 2026 as of March 16, 2026: RankCompanyDisclosed Layoffs in 2025 and 2026 1Amazon30,184 2Intel27,058 3Microsoft15,347 4HP8,000 5Meta5,800 6Salesforce5,385 7Block4,931 8Northvolt2,800 9Hewlett Packard Enterprise2,552 10Autodesk2,350 11Workday2,150 12Synopsys2,000 13WiseTech2,000 14Atlassian1,950 15ASML1,700 Since 2020, Amazon has disclosed layoffs of around 58,000 employees. While this is more than many companies’ entire workforce, for Amazon it represents less than 4% of its 1.56 million employees. The next major Big Tech company on the list is Meta with 5,800 disclosed layoffs, and reports note that the company is eyeing additional 2026 cuts that could reduce headcount by 20%. Why Big Tech Is Still Cutting Jobs Many of the largest tech layoffs in 2025 and 2026 reflect a similar set of pressures: slower growth, tighter cost controls, and increased investment in AI. Some companies have been explicit about AI’s role. Block, for example, cut nearly half its workforce in 2026 with 4,000 layoffs, as CEO Jack Dorsey pointed to AI automation as a driver of a broader, one-time reorganization instead of smaller, ongoing cuts. Following his announcement, the company’s share price rose more than 20% in a single day. In other cases, companies have emphasized structural changes rather than AI directly. At Amazon, January 2026 layoffs were part of efforts to reduce management layers, streamline decision-making, and reallocate resources toward priority areas, while continuing to hire in select roles. Intel, meanwhile, tied its cuts to a broader multiyear turnaround. The company said it aims to align its cost structure with a new operating model, pursue $10 billion in 2025 cost savings, and simplify operations amid ongoing margin pressure. Learn More on the Voronoi App If you enjoyed today’s post, check the world’s fastest growing jobs on Voronoi.

Read More

Countries Losing Trust in the U.S.

Published 5 hours ago on April 2, 2026 By Julia Wendling Graphics & Design Zack Aboulazm Athul Alexander Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Email The following content is sponsored by Inigo Countries Losing Trust in the U.S.     Key Takeaways Trust in the United States has declined across all surveyed G7 and BRICs countries, with Canada showing the steepest drop at -52%.        Major European allies including Italy, France, and Germany report declines between -15% and -21%.        Public support for higher defense spending is rising in Europe, with 43% in France and 32% in Germany.        Global perceptions of the United States are shifting. Data from the Munich Security Conference shows a clear decline in trust across advanced and emerging economies. This visualization, created in partnership with Inigo, provides visual context to these shifting perceptions and highlights where sentiment is changing fastest. These shifts reflect a broader reassessment of alliances in a more uncertain world. Declining Trust Across Allies Among traditional allies, the drop in trust is sharp. Canada records the steepest decline at -52%. Italy follows at -21%. France stands at -17%. CountryTrust in the United States (% change in perception) United Kingdom-13 Italy-21 France-17 Japan-16 Brazil-20 India-10 Canada-52 Germany-15 South Africa-21 China-9 Germany and Japan also show meaningful declines at -15% and -16%. The United Kingdom is down -13%. These are not isolated moves. They point to weakening confidence across long-standing partnerships. Policy uncertainty is one key driver. Shifting trade positions and tariff threats have strained economic relationships. Rhetoric around territorial expansion has also raised concerns, including proposals to annex Greenland and suggestions that Canada could become the 51st state. At the same time, security concerns are rising across Europe. A January 2026 Eurobarometer poll shows 43% of respondents in France and 32% in Germany support higher defense spending. This suggests allies are preparing for a more uncertain security environment. Emerging Economies Reflect Similar Trends The pattern extends beyond Western allies. Brazil and South Africa both decline by more than -20%. India and China show smaller but still negative shifts at -10% and -9%. This suggests a broad reset in global sentiment. It is not driven by one region alone. Strategic uncertainty is rising across markets. A Rocky Road Ahead The data points to a more fragmented global landscape. Trust in the United States is declining across multiple regions. At the same time, countries are preparing for greater uncertainty. Rising defense support in Europe reinforces this shift. Public sentiment is signaling change. Global alliances may be entering a new phase. Explore a Data-Driven View of Risk. You may also like Real Estate1 month ago Mapped: The U.S. Cities at Risk of Sinking Across the U.S., the ground beneath many major cities is gradually subsiding. 25 out of America’s 28 largest cities are slowly sinking. Real Estate1 month ago Charted: The Escalating Destruction of U.S. Wildfires Wildfires in the United States are becoming more destructive, with many of the most severe seasons occurring in the past decade. Real Estate1 month ago Mapped: The U.S. States Building the Most Homes in the Fire Line As housing spreads into the fire line, exposure is rising sharply, compounding loss potential and challenging long-term insurability. Real Estate1 month ago The Rising Costs of U.S. Construction Inputs Rising labor and material costs mean every insured dollar now rebuilds less, widening the recovery gap after disasters across the United States. Real Estate2 months ago How Do Interest Rates Impact the Real Estate Market? Lower interest rates have often supported stronger real estate returns and improved valuations. Will that trend return in 2026? Real Estate2 months ago 6 Trends Reshaping U.S. Property Insurance From climate volatility to economic and technological shifts, a wide range of forces are reshaping property risk in the U.S. Environment6 months ago Ranked: The 10 Most Powerful U.S. Hurricanes (1900-2025) Hurricanes are a defining force in the U.S. climate, capable of leaving behind profound environmental, social, and economic devastation. Environment6 months ago Mapped: Which U.S. Cities Saw Record-Breaking Temperatures in 2024? Global temperatures are climbing—but how is this trend playing out across the United States, and which regions are being hit the hardest? Environment7 months ago Ranked: The Most Expensive U.S. Wildfire Events, So Far Wildfire events are growing increasingly frequent and destructive around the world as human-driven climate impacts continue to escalate. Environment7 months ago Mapped: The United States of Drought Drought grips much of the U.S., affecting over 60 million people today. Healthcare8 months ago The $58B Weight Loss Drug Market in One Chart Weight loss drugs have surged in popularity in recent years, transforming the pharmaceutical landscape. Which brands are dominating this space? Healthcare8 months ago Ranked: Which Areas Receive the Most Pharma R&D? The pharmaceutical industry has made enormous strides in treating—and even curing—a wide range of diseases and conditions. Which areas are seeing the most R&D in 2025? Healthcare8 months ago The $5.6T Pharmaceutical Industry in One Chart Pharma giants don’t just make medicine—they shape the future of healthcare. Who are the world’s major players? Crime9 months ago 6 Fraud Trends Reshaping Risk in 2025 The fraud and financial crime landscapes are evolving rapidly. What are the key threats shaping risk in 2025? Cryptocurrency9 months ago Ranked: The 10 Biggest Digital Heists Some of the largest digital heists didn’t rely on brute-force hacking, they exploited the weakest link in security: human trust. Crime9 months ago The Most Costly Financial Crimes in 2024 As cybersecurity threats escalate, which financial crimes are causing the most harm? The FBI has the data. Crime9 months ago Mapped: U.S. Financial Crime Activity by State Suspicious activity has been rising in the U.S., but is it spread evenly throughout all 50 states? Certainly not. Crime9 months ago Ranked: America’s Most Common Financial Crimes As technology and AI become more widespread, fraud and other suspicious activity are rising across America. Which types are the most common? Economy9 months ago Tracking the $3.1 Trillion Financial Crime Pandemic From money laundering to fraud, financial crime acts as a drain on the economy, totaling an incredible $3.1 trillion. Politics10 months ago Which Types of Government Rule the World? Over half the global population is ruled by non-centrist types of government, including autocracies and left or right wing parties. Politics10 months ago Breaking Down the $524 Billion Investment Needed to Rebuild Ukraine Ukraine will require an estimated $524B over the next decade to recover from the Russia-Ukraine war. Which sectors have been most impacted? Politics11 months ago Are Tariffs Causing U.S. Inflation Fears? Amid tariff increases, consumers’ expectations for U.S. inflation in the next five years have reached their highest level since March 1991. Politics11 months ago Ranked: Executive Orders by President in the First 100 Days In his first 100 days, President Trump has issued far more executive orders than any other president in history. Subscribe Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Join 375,000+ email subscribers: *Sign Up

Read More

Ranked: The U.S. States Building the Most Data Centers

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Ranked: The U.S. States Building the Most Data Centers See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Texas is projected to become the largest data center hub in the U.S., with 962 total sites in the pipeline. Virginia leads today but is expected to fall to second as new projects come online. Georgia is emerging as a breakout hub, with announced projects exceeding its current footprint by over 5x. Data center construction is accelerating across the U.S. as demand for AI, cloud computing, and digital services continues to climb. This surge is shifting where new infrastructure gets built—and which states are poised to dominate in the years ahead. This graphic ranks states by their total pipeline of data centers, including operational sites, projects under construction, and announced developments. The data comes from Aterio, as of March 2026. Texas Is Set to Overtake Virginia in Data Centers Texas is on track to surpass Virginia as the top U.S. data center hub, with a projected 962 total sites across operational, under-construction, and announced projects. Currently, Texas has just 212 operating data centers and 140 under construction. The data table below shows the number of current, in construction, and announced data centers in each U.S. state: StateOperationalUnder constructionAnnouncedTotal Data Centers Texas212140610962 Virginia320136498954 Georgia6256340458 Pennsylvania3711209257 Arizona8335136254 Ohio1015198250 Illinois7819153250 California166640212 Utah2910117156 Oregon971433144 Nevada272975134 New York50372125 Indiana282369120 Iowa581538111 Washington71326100 North Carolina43124095 Minnesota2744576 New Mexico1355270 Missouri2483769 Florida5321267 Oklahoma2293465 Alabama1583659 Wisconsin18122858 New Jersey492657 Michigan3112153 Mississippi10211950 Colorado3161047 Kentucky1023446 Wyoming1282545 West Virginia403943 Connecticut703340 Nebraska265839 South Carolina1812838 Tennessee313337 Louisiana10111637 Maryland12121034 Massachusetts230023 Kansas811120 Arkansas421218 Montana401115 North Dakota24814 Idaho42612 Maine40711 Delaware6039 South Dakota2068 New Hampshire6006 District Of Columbia5005 Rhode Island3003 Hawaii2002 Vermont1001 Knocked to the second spot, Virginia would be home to 954 data centers. It currently has 320 operational sites and 136 under construction. Aterio categorizes projects as announced when there is a building permit, utility filing, or public announcement for a data center that hasn’t yet broken ground. When it does, the company swaps the project to under construction. It takes around two years to build such a facility, though this is highly dependent on the size, chosen site, and permitting. Data Center Growth in Other U.S. States While Texas and Virginia are miles ahead of others on both current and prospective data centers, the rankings of states beneath them are set to change substantially. California and Ohio are the only two other states that have operational data centers topping 100, at 166 and 101, respectively. However, California looks to be in eighth place for the most future data centers, with a total of 212. Ohio would be number six, at 250 data centers. Georgia is emerging as one of the fastest-growing data center hubs in the country. Its pipeline of 340 announced projects alone is more than five times its current number of operational facilities. Pennsylvania will also experience skyrocketing growth, at 594.6%, as it moves from 37 data centers to a possible 257. New Hampshire, the District Of Columbia, Rhode Island, Hawaii and Vermont each have no data centers under construction or announced. Interestingly, Vermont and New Hampshire are among the 11 states that are considering a moratorium or restrictions on the construction of new data centers. Vermont currently has just one operational data center, while New Hampshire has six. How Energy Access Influences Location Access to power is becoming the biggest constraint on data center expansion, increasingly determining which states can support new development. As the best sites are snapped up and the data center industry shows few signs of slowing, developers will be forced to look at different locations. To work around power constraints, some developers are securing dedicated energy sources or co-locating new generation alongside data centers—further shaping where future hubs can emerge. Disused industrial sites that already have a connection to the grid are also catching the eyes of developers, as they can bypass some of these challenges. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about the data center build out, check out this graphic which shows global data center demand by region.

Read More

Half of U.S. Exports Come From Just 6 States

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app. Use This Visualization Half of U.S. Exports Come From Just 6 States See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources. Key Takeaways Six states make up more than half of U.S. exports in 2025. Texas is the clear leader, accounting for 21.8% of the total. Meanwhile, 27 states each contribute less than 1%. America’s export economy is far more concentrated than one would expect. In 2025, just six states—Texas, California, New York, Louisiana, Illinois, and Florida—accounted for over half of all U.S. exports. Together, they generated roughly $1 trillion in trade, out of a $2.1 trillion total. Texas stands far above the rest. The state alone makes up 21.8% of U.S. exports, meaning more than one in every five export dollars originates there. Using the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau, this chart shows how export activity is heavily concentrated across a small group of states, with most contributing only a fraction of the total. Texas Exports More Than Entire Countries With $450 billion in goods exports in 2025, Texas surpasses major global economies, including India ($445 billion) and Russia ($419 billion). Despite a slight 1% annual decline, Texas exports have surged 81% over the past decade, driven largely by energy and industrial output. This highlights how a single U.S. state plays an outsized role not just nationally, but globally. The table below shows how Texas’s scale of exports compare to the rest of America: RankStateShare of TotalValue Change2024-2025 1Texas21.8%$450.3B-1% 2California9.1%$188.4B2% 3New York7.4%$153.1B63% 4Louisiana4.5%$93.4B8% 5Illinois3.9%$80.0B-2% 6Florida3.8%$78.9B9% 7Indiana3.3%$68.8B14% 8Washington3.2%$65.3B13% 9Georgia2.9%$60.3B13% 10Michigan2.8%$58.3B-7% 11Ohio2.7%$55.9B-3% 12Pennsylvania2.5%$52.2B-2% 13Kentucky2.5%$50.6B6% 14Arizona2.2%$44.4B37% 15New Jersey2.1%$44.2B2% 16North Carolina2.1%$43.8B2% 17Massachusetts1.9%$38.8B11% 18South Carolina1.9%$38.5B1% 19Tennessee1.8%$37.7B-4% 20Oregon1.4%$28.0B-17% 21Wisconsin1.3%$27.1B-2% 22Alabama1.1%$23.7B-12% 23Minnesota1.1%$23.5B-13% 24Utah1.1%$22.4B23% 25Virginia0.9%$19.0B-12% 26Missouri0.9%$18.7B-3% 27Connecticut0.9%$17.7B2% 28Maryland0.8%$16.5B-8% 29Iowa0.8%$16.2B-5% 30New Mexico0.7%$15.3B27% 31Kansas0.7%$14.6B1% 32Mississippi0.7%$14.2B3% 33Nevada0.6%$12.7B22% 34Colorado0.5%$11.0B4% 35North Dakota0.4%$8.6B26% 36Nebraska0.4%$7.8B-5% 37Oklahoma0.4%$7.5B-4% 38New Hampshire0.3%$7.2B1% 39Alaska0.3%$6.7B13% 40Arkansas0.3%$6.6B-4% 41Delaware0.3%$5.5B15% 42West Virginia0.2%$4.6B-5% 43Idaho0.2%$4.6B7% 44Rhode Island0.2%$4.2B36% 45Dist of Columbia0.2%$3.7BN/A 46Maine0.2%$3.2B2% 47Montana0.1%$2.1B-12% 48Vermont0.1%$2.1B9% 49Wyoming0.1%$2.0B-4% 50South Dakota0.1%$1.9B-13% 51Hawaii0.0%$0.4B-14% Louisiana is another standout, known for its massive LNG industry. While it accounts for just 1.1% of U.S. GDP, it generates 4.5% of total exports, exceeding Florida, despite having a population nearly five times smaller. This imbalance underscores the importance of energy hubs in driving U.S. trade. California, meanwhile, contributes 9.1% of exports ($188.4 billion), with Washington (3.2%) and Arizona (2.2%) also playing key roles across the West. Most States Contribute Very Little Beyond the top exporters, there’s a steep drop-off. A total of 27 states each account for less than 1% of U.S. exports, with many contributing just a fraction of that. Smaller states like South Dakota, Wyoming, and Vermont each generate roughly 0.1% of exports, reflecting both their size and limited industrial base. This level of concentration reveals how dependent U.S. trade is on a small number of states, particularly energy and manufacturing hubs. While this concentration can drive efficiency, it also creates vulnerabilities. Economic shocks, policy changes, or disruptions in just a few regions could have an outsized impact on the entire U.S. export economy. Learn More on the Voronoi App To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the countries that rely most on imported energy.

Read More

Showing 461 to 472 of 472 entries
DDH honours the copyright of news publishers and, with respect for the intellectual property of the editorial offices, displays only a small part of the news or the published article. The information here serves the purpose of providing a quick and targeted overview of current trends and developments. If you are interested in individual topics, please click on a news item. We will then forward you to the publishing house and the corresponding article.
· Actio recta non erit, nisi recta fuerit voluntas ·